[1]瞿杭波△ 赵琦辉 雷文涛 倪灵之 李陶冶 叶辛 梅正峰 黄东辉 朱红 张贻春.新式骨盆牵引装置治疗腰椎间盘突出症的研究[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2016,24(12):19-22.
　QU Hangbo ZHAO Qihui LEI Wentao NI Lingzhi LI Taoye YE Xin,MEI Zhengfeng HUANG Donghui ZHU Hong ZHANG Yichun.Research on New Type of Pelvic Traction Device for Treating Lumbar Disc Herniation[J].Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics,2016,24(12):19-22.
点击复制

新式骨盆牵引装置治疗腰椎间盘突出症的研究
分享到：

《中国中医骨伤科杂志》[ISSN:1005-0205/CN:42-1340/R]

卷:
第24卷
期数:
2016年12期
页码:
19-22
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2016-12-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on New Type of Pelvic Traction Device for Treating Lumbar Disc Herniation
作者:
瞿杭波1△ 赵琦辉1 雷文涛1 倪灵之1 李陶冶1 叶辛1 梅正峰1 黄东辉1 朱红1 张贻春1
Author(s):
QU Hangbo1△ ZHAO Qihui1 LEI Wentao1 NI Lingzhi1 LI Taoye1 YE Xin1; MEI Zhengfeng1 HUANG Donghui1 ZHU Hong1 ZHANG Yichun1
1The Third People's Hospital of Hangzhou,Hangzhou 310009,China.
关键词:
腰椎间盘突出;  骨盆牵引;  腰痛
Keywords:
lumbar disc herniation;  pelvic traction;  backache
分类号:
R681.5
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:探讨新式骨盆牵引装置对腰椎间盘突出症的临床治疗疗效。方法:2013年1月至2015年6月,将门诊诊断为腰椎间盘突出症的患者120例分成2组,每组60例,其中第1组为传统骨盆牵引+美洛昔康治疗组,第2组为新式骨盆牵引+美洛昔康治疗组。进行回顾性分析:男67例,女53例; 年龄23～69岁,平均45.7岁; 病程1个月～2年,平均12个月。对2组患者分别在治疗前、治疗1个月、随访3个月后进行ODI评分及VAS评分,观察患者的生活质量,同时对2组患者的牵引进行时的舒适度评分。结果:第2组患者在治疗结束时、治疗结束后3个月的ODI评分和VAS 评分较前组有明显的下降,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05); 第2组患者牵引时的舒适度评分较第1组高,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:新式骨盆牵引装置能够提高牵引治疗时的舒适度,治疗腰椎间盘突出症时有不错的临床疗效。
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the clinical efficacy of new pelvic traction device for treating lumbar disc herniation.Methods:From January 2013 to June 2015,120 patients diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation were divided into two groups,60 cases in each group.The group 1 were treating with the traditional pelvic traction + meloxicam,and the group 2 were treating with new pelvic traction + meloxicam.All patients were retrospectively analyzed.There were 67 males and 53 females; aged 23～69 years old,mean 45.7 years old; duration of 1 month to 2 years,with an average of 12 months.The ODI score and VAS score were recorded before treatment,1 month after treatment,and 3 months after treatment in the two groups.The patients' quality of life were observed,and traction proceeds comfort were scored.Results:The ODI score and VAS score of patients in group 2 at the end of treatment,3 months after treatment was significantly decreased compared with the group 1(P<0.05); the traction comfort score of group 2 was higher than that of the group 1(P<0.05).Conclusion:The new pelvic traction device can improve the comfort of traction therapy,and has good clinical efficacy for treating lumbar disc herniation.

参考文献/References:

[1] Manchikanti L.Epidemiology of low back pain[J].Pain Physician,2000,3(2):167-192.
[2] 张喜林,沈国权,金喜宏,等.分期综合治疗成年腰椎问盘突出症81 6例分析[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2015,23(6):14-17.
[3] Katz JN.Lumbar disc disorders and low-back pain:socioeconomic factors and consequences[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2006,88(2):21-24.
[4] 国家中医药管理局.中医病证诊断疗效标准[S].南京:南京大学出版社,1994:186.
[5] 路华杰,彭晓艳.中西医结合治疗急性腰椎问盘突出症92例[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2015,23(7):60-61.
[6] 侯树勋.腰痛机理的新认识[J].中华骨科杂志,1995,15(2):110-113.
[7] 王洪伟,李长青,周跃.腰椎间盘突出症疼痛发生机制的研究进展[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2011,19(7):568-570.
[8] 李震.分期治疗腰椎问盘突出症临床疗效观察[J].海南医学院学报,2012,18(5):668-672.
[9] 李长辉,蔡树河,王诗忠,等.腰椎间盘突出症分期综合治疗方案探讨[J].福建中医药大学学报,2010,20(6):7-9.
[10] 董桦,王金贵.辨证分期推拿治疗腰椎间盘突出症随机对照研究[J].辽宁中医杂志,2014,41(7):1505-1507.
[11] 朱美兰,罗军,戴江华.分期康复治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效观察[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2013,35(3):213-215.
[12] Borman P,Keskin D,Bodur H.The efficacy of lumbar traction in the management of patients with low back pain[J].Rheumatol Int,2003,23(2):82-86.
[13] Meszaros TF,Olson R,Kulig K,et al.Effect of 10%,30%,and 60% body weight traction on the straight leg raise test of symptomatic patients with low back pain[J].J Orthop Sports Phys Ther,2000,30(10):595-601.
[14] 吕一,朱胤晟.液压腰椎牵引器治疗腰椎间盘突出症临床疗效观察[J].中医正骨,2013,25(5):20-21.
[15] 肖爱伟,姜贵云,勾丽洁,等.下肢持续皮牵引治疗老年腰椎间盘突出症患者的疗效及安全性观察[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2014,32(12):946-947.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:浙江省杭州市卫生局基金项目(2013A26) 1浙江杭州市第三人民医院(杭州,310009) △通信作者 E-mail:764753499@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-12-01