[1]程权 刘洋△ 陈方舟 谭俊峰 杨青.单侧与双侧经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松椎体 压缩骨折的疗效比较[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2016,24(05):29-32.
　CHENG Quan LIU Yang CHEN Fangzhou TAN Junfeng YANG Qing.Efficacy Comparison of Unilateral and Bilateral Percutaneous Vertebroplasty in Treatment of the Osteoporotic Vertebral Compressive Fractures[J].Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics,2016,24(05):29-32.
点击复制

单侧与双侧经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松椎体 压缩骨折的疗效比较
分享到：

《中国中医骨伤科杂志》[ISSN:1005-0205/CN:42-1340/R]

卷:
第24卷
期数:
2016年05期
页码:
29-32
栏目:
实验研究
出版日期:
2016-05-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Efficacy Comparison of Unilateral and Bilateral Percutaneous Vertebroplasty in Treatment of the Osteoporotic Vertebral Compressive Fractures
文章编号:
1005-0205(2016)05-0029-04
作者:
程权1 刘洋2△ 陈方舟2 谭俊峰2 杨青2
1.湖北中医药大学(武汉,430061)
2.武汉市第五医院(江汉大学第二附属医院)骨科
△.通信作者 E-mail:liuyang19642000@163.com
Author(s):
CHENG Quan1 LIU Yang2△ CHEN Fangzhou2 TAN Junfeng2 YANG Qing2
1.Hubei University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Wuhan 430061,China;
2.Department of Orthopedics,the Fifth Hospital of Wuhan,Wuhan 430050,China.
关键词:
高黏度骨水泥;  椎体成形术;  骨质疏松;  椎体压缩性骨折
Keywords:
high viscosity bone cement;  vertebroplasty;  osteoporosis;  vertebral compressive fractures
分类号:
R683.2
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:探讨单侧与双侧高粘度骨水泥经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效比较。方法:选取老年性骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折患者223例,共280个椎体。随机分为2组,单侧组共115例,154个椎体,双侧组共108例,126个椎体。单侧组为单侧穿刺骨水泥注射过椎体中线,双侧组为双侧穿刺骨水泥注入,治疗3 d后比较两组患者手术时间、手术前后视觉模拟疼痛评分、椎体高度恢复率、椎体后凸Cobb 角改善及术后骨水泥渗漏病例评定患者的临床疗效。结果:单侧穿刺组与双侧穿刺组手术时间分别为(30.84±1.95)min,(41.28±1.94)min,比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。单侧组与双侧组椎体平均高度恢复率为分别为94.26%±3.51%和96.35%±3.22%,比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05); 单侧组与双侧组视觉模拟疼痛评分分别为1.41±0.12和1.12±0.13,比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05); 单侧组与双侧组术后Cobb角恢复分别为13.70°±1.61°和13.31°±1.25°,比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05); 单侧组渗漏病例远低于双侧组,分别为5.84%和12.69%,比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。所有患者术后获得3～48个月(平均16个月)随访,其中1例出现神经根症状,所有患者未出现感染、肺栓塞等并发症。结论:单侧与双侧经椎弓根经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折均可取得满意的止痛效果,且前者具有手术时间短、术后并发症发生率低等优点。
Abstract:
Objective: To discuss the curative effect of unilateral and bilateral high viscosity bone cement in treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Methods:223 cases of senile OVCF were selected,a total of 280 vertebrae.The patients were randomLy divided into 2 groups according to the puncture site,154 cases of 115 vertebral bodies in unilateral group and 126 cases of 108 vertebral bodies in bilateral group.In the unilateral group,bone cement was injected from one side and through the midline of the vertebral body while the cement was injected from both sides in the bilateral group.3 days after treatment,the operation time,visual analogue pain score,vertebral height recovery rate,Cobb angle of vertebral body and cement leakage rate were compared between the two groups.Results:There was significant difference in the operation time(30.84±1.95 min vs 41.28±1.94min)between the two groups(P<0.001).There was no significant difference in the average recovery rate of vertebrae height(94.26%±3.51% vs 96.35%±3.22%),visual analog pain scores(1.41±0.12 vs 1.12±0.13)and postoperative Cobb angle recovery(13.70°±1.61° vs 13.31°±1.25°)between the two groups(P<0.05).The leakage rate in the unilateral group was much lower than that in the bilateral group(5.84% vs 12.69%),and there was statistical difference(P<0.05).All patients were followed up for 3 to 48 months(mean 16 months).1 patient had symptom of nerve root and all the patients had no complications such as infection and pulmonary embolism.Conclusion:Both unilateral and bilateral PKP in the treatment of OVCF can obtain satisfactory analgesic effect,and the former has the advantages of short operation time and low incidence of postoperative complications.

参考文献/References:

[1] 张智海,刘忠厚,李娜,等.中国人骨质疏松症诊断标准专家共识(第三稿2014版)[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,2014,20(9):1007-1010.
[2] 谢国平,刘文刚,魏凌峰,等.椎体成形术与保守治疗胸腰椎压缩性骨折的疗效比较[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2010,18(12):8-10.
[3] 卢昌怀,刘志军,张宏波,等.单侧与双侧PVP治疗骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩性骨折疗效分析[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2015,23(4):23-25.
[4] 冯晶,郑启新,肖少雄,等.单双侧入路PKP治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的临床研究[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2012,20(10):26-29.
[5] Anselmetti GC,Zoarski G,Manca A,et al.Percutaneous vertebroplasty and bone cement leakage:clinical experience with a new high-viscosity bone cement and delivery system for vertebral augmentation in benign and malignant compression fractures[J].Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol,2008,31(5):937-947.
[6] 李国洪,原超.经皮椎体成形术并发症概述[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2013,21(5):69-72.
[7] 卢昌怀,刘志军,张宏波,等.骨水泥量及分布对椎体成形术后相邻椎体生物力学影响的三维有限元分析[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,2015,21(1):29-33.
[8] 刘洋,李明辉,梅红军.经皮椎体成形术后骨水泥渗漏的回顾性分析及预防策略[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,2013,19(4):375-380.
[9] 张福恒,陈德喜,王开友,等.椎体成形术中高黏度骨水泥渗漏分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2015,30(5):470-472.
[10] 金洁.骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折致痛机制及PKP的镇痛原理探讨[D].武汉:湖北中医药大学,2014.
[11] 张伟,杨金华,王筱林,等.经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗胸腰椎椎体骨折的疗效观察[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2014,29(7):657-659.
[12] 潘俊,杨惠林,孟斌.经皮椎体成形术及椎体后凸成形术骨水泥的研究进展[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2012,22(1):81-84.
[13] 钟远鸣,付拴虎,张家立,等.经皮穿刺椎体成形术中骨水泥渗漏的原因及预防[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2014,22(4):294-298.
[14] 齐新生,茅治湘,王全明,等.经皮椎体成形术骨水泥外渗原因及对策[J].江苏医药,2007,33(8):806-807.
[15] 李中连,周森叶,沈海琦,等.关于经皮椎体成形术骨水泥注入量及相关技术的应用分析[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2012,20(6):43-44.
[16] 刘展亮,张惠城,陈嘉裕,等.经皮椎体成形术中骨水泥注射量与疗效的关系[J].广东医学,2010,31(4):444-446.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:卫生部医药卫生科技发展研究中心基金资助 (W2012ZT15)
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-05-15