[1]吴天然 陈夏平 王瑞雄 林江游 叶志强 张昭兴 敖庆芳 邹许亭 吴振斌.主钉开口处取骨植骨在股骨粗隆下骨折髓内钉固定术中的应用价值分析[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2022,30(07):38-43.
　WU Tianran CHEN Xiaping WANG Ruixiong LIN Jiangyou YE ZhiqiangZHANG Zhaoxing AO Qingfang ZOU Xuting WU Zhenbin.The Clinical Research of Bone Grafting at the Main Nail Opening in Intramedullary Nail Fixation on Subtrochanteric Fracture of Femur[J].Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics,2022,30(07):38-43.
点击复制

主钉开口处取骨植骨在股骨粗隆下骨折髓内钉固定术中的应用价值分析()
分享到：

《中国中医骨伤科杂志》[ISSN:1005-0205/CN:42-1340/R]

卷:
第30卷
期数:
2022年07期
页码:
38-43
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2022-07-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Clinical Research of Bone Grafting at the Main Nail Opening in Intramedullary Nail Fixation on Subtrochanteric Fracture of Femur
文章编号:
1005-0205(2022)07-0038-06
作者:
吴天然1 陈夏平1 王瑞雄1 林江游1 叶志强1 张昭兴1 敖庆芳1 邹许亭1 吴振斌1
1泉州市正骨医院(福建 泉州,362000)
Author(s):
WU Tianran1 CHEN Xiaping1 WANG Ruixiong1 LIN Jiangyou1 YE Zhiqiang1ZHANG Zhaoxing1 AO Qingfang1 ZOU Xuting1 WU Zhenbin1
1Quanzhou Orthoprdic-Traumatological Hospital,Quanzhou 362000,Fujian China.
关键词:
股骨粗隆下骨折;  骨折固定术;  髓内钉;  植骨
Keywords:
subtrochanteric fracture of femur;  fracture fixation;  intramedullary nail;  bone grafting
分类号:
R683.42
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:探讨主钉开口处取骨植骨在股骨粗隆下骨折髓内钉内固定术中的应用价值。方法:将2019年1月至2021年9月收治的符合纳入标准的股骨粗隆下骨折患者60例纳入研究,根据患者入组顺序随机分成两组,各30例。对照组单纯采用髓内钉常规治疗,观察组在对照组基础上加用主钉开口处取骨植骨。对两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、骨折复位情况、术后并发症、骨折愈合率和髋关节功能进行临床随访分析。结果:所有患者均按要求进行随访,随访时间为10～24个月,平均(15.3±3.2)个月,两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量及骨折复位情况比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05); 两组患者术后并发症、骨折愈合率和髋关节功能对比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:在股骨粗隆下骨折髓内钉内固定术中采用主钉开口处取骨并植骨,其操作简单,不增加手术步骤,骨折愈合率更高,术后患肢功能恢复更好,且并发症少,这种无额外医源性创伤和排异反应的植骨技术值得广大临床骨科医师参考应用。
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the application value of bone grafting at the main nail opening in intramedullary nail fixation on subtrochanteric fracture of femur.Methods:60 patients with subtrochanteric fracture of femur who meeting the inclusion criteria were included in the study from January 2019 to September 2021.According to the order of inclusion,the patients were randomly divided into two groups with 30 patients in each group.The control group was treated with intramedullary nailing alone,and the observation group was treated with bone grafting at the main nail opening on the basis of the control group.The operative time,intraoperative blood loss,fracture reduction,postoperative complications,fracture healing rate and hip function of the two groups were analyzed in clinical follow-up.Results:All patients were followed up as required for 10 to 24 months,with(15.3±3.2)months on average.There were no significant differences in operative time,intraoperative blood loss and fracture reduction between the two groups(P>0.05).There were significant differences in postoperative complications,fracture healing rate and hip function between the two groups(P<0.05).Conclusion:The technique of bone grafting at the main nail opening in intramedullary nail fixation on subtrochanteric fracture of femur is simple in operation,and does not increase the operation steps,with higher fracture healing rate,better recovery of limb function and fewer complications.The bone implant technique has no additional iatrogenic trauma and rejection of the graft,which is worth the clinical orthopedic surgeon’s reference.

参考文献/References:

[1] MATTISSON L,BOJAN A,ENOCSON A.Epidemiology,treatment and mortality of trochanteric and subtrochanteric hip fractures:data from the Swedish fracture register[J].BMC Musculoskelft Disord,2018,19(1):369.
[2] 郭甲瑞,余进伟,陈旭.股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定治疗股骨转子下骨折[J].中医正骨,2016,28(6):48-52.
[3] 毕红宾,郭明伟,孙楠,等.股骨近端髓内钉与股骨近端锁定钢板固定治疗股骨粗隆下骨折的疗效比较[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2020,35(8):819-821.
[4] 洪意侠,傅煊健,贾兆锋,等.股骨粗隆下骨折的手术治疗进展[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2021,36(2):219-221.
[5] 马成才,廖中亚,刘冰,等.加长型PFNA与LPFP内固定治疗股骨粗隆下骨折的疗效比较[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2018,33(4):346-348.
[6] SIMS S H.Subtrochanteric femur fractures[J].Orthop Clin North Am,2002,33(1):113-126.
[7] 徐昭宁,陈方毅,李德芳,等.单纯髓内钉与髓内钉附加钢板固定股骨粗隆下粉碎性骨折的对比[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2020,28(2):139-143.
[8] 林勇,蓝芳,林伟龙.加长型Gamma钉联合有限切开钛缆内固定治疗股骨粗隆下骨折疗效观察[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2020,35(10):1065-1066.
[9] 薛成杰,王兴暖,夏冰.加长型股骨重建钉联合钢缆环扎内固定治疗股骨粗隆下骨折[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2021,36(4):385-387.
[10] HUANG X,ZHANG F,ZHANG Y.Case series and finite element analysis of PFNA combined with cerclage wire for treatment of subtrochanteric fracture of femur[J].J Orthop Surg Res,2021,16(1):70.
[11] 吴天然,陈夏平,王瑞雄,等.主钉开口处骨泥植骨在股骨粗隆下骨折加长股骨近端防旋髓内钉术中的应用[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2020,28(11):59-64.
[12] 孙群周,刘玉东,李阳阳,等.股骨近端解剖型锁定钢板内固定联合自体髂骨植骨治疗股骨转子下骨折不愈合[J].中医正骨,2019,31(5):49-51.
[13] 章晓云.骨不连的成因及治疗进展[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2021,36(3):331-333.
[14] UZER G,ELMADAG N M,YIDIZ F,et al.Comparison of two types of proximal femoral hails in the treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures[J].Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg,2015,21(5):381-391.
[15] 郎彦飞,刘娜,王丙刚,等.经皮微创植骨结合髓内钉内固定治疗股骨粗隆下骨折的临床疗效[J].江苏医药,2018,44(5):497-499.
[16] STUDER P,SUHM N,WANG Q,et al.Displaced trochanteric fragments lead to poor functional outcome in pertrochanteric fractures treated by cephalomedullary nails[J].Injury,2015,46(12):2384-2388.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:泉州市科学技术局项目(2020N076s)
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01