[1]孙凌梅 童迅 彭文娟 张文秀 王曼丽 王策△.体外冲击波联合手法松解治疗膝关节粘连的临床研究[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2021,29(06):9-12.
　SUN Lingmei TONG Xun PENG Wenjuan ZHANG Wenxiu WANG Manli WANG Ce.Clinical Study of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Combinedwith Manual Relaxation for Knee Joint Adhesion[J].Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics,2021,29(06):9-12.
点击复制

体外冲击波联合手法松解治疗膝关节粘连的临床研究()
分享到：

《中国中医骨伤科杂志》[ISSN:1005-0205/CN:42-1340/R]

卷:
第29卷
期数:
2021年06期
页码:
9-12
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2021-06-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical Study of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Combinedwith Manual Relaxation for Knee Joint Adhesion
文章编号:
1005-0205(2021)06-0009-04
作者:
孙凌梅1 童迅1 彭文娟1 张文秀1 王曼丽1 王策1△
1中国人民解放军陆军第七十一集团军医院疼痛康复科(江苏 徐州,221000)
Author(s):
SUN Lingmei1 TONG Xun1 PENG Wenjuan1 ZHANG Wenxiu1 WANG Manli1 WANG Ce1△
1Department of Pain and Rehabilitation, Hospital of the 71st Group Army of PLA,Xuzhou 221000,Jiangsu China.
关键词:
膝关节粘连;  体外冲击波;  手法松解;  膝关节功能;  疼痛
Keywords:
knee joint adhesion;  extracorporeal shock wave;  manual release treatment;  knee joint function;  pain
分类号:
R684
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:观察体外冲击波联合手法松解治疗膝关节粘连对关节功能恢复及疼痛的改善作用。方法:选取2017年10月至2020年10月接诊的106例膝关节粘连患者,随机数字表法分为对照组(53例,手法松解治疗)和观察组(53例,体外冲击波联合手法松解治疗)。比较两组治疗前后伸直受限角度、屈曲角度、膝关节功能、疼痛情况,比较两组治疗不良事件发生情况。结果:106例患者随访6～10个月,平均(8.14±1.57)个月,期间对照组脱落6例,观察组脱落2例。治疗前两组伸直受限角度、屈曲角度、膝关节Lysholm评分、疼痛数字评分法(NRS)评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后两组伸直受限角度均缩小,观察组小于对照组; 屈曲角度均扩大,观察组大于对照组; 膝关节Lysholm评分均升高,观察组高于对照组; NRS评分均降低,观察组低于对照组(P<0.05)。两组治疗不良事件总发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:体外冲击波联合手法松解治疗膝关节粘连可有效改善膝关节活动度、膝关节功能,减轻疼痛,且安全可靠。
Abstract:
To observe the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave combined with manual release of knee joint adhesion on joint function recovery and pain improvement. Methods:A total of 106 patients with knee joint adhesions admitted to hospital from October 2017 to October 2020 were randomly divided into control group(53 cases, manual relaxation treatment)and observation group(53 cases, extracorporeal shock wave combined manual relaxation treatment). The extension limit angle, flexion angle, knee function, and pain of the two groups before and after treatment were compared. The occurrence of adverse events of the two groups were compared. Results:106 patients were followed up(8.14±1.57)months(6 to 10 months). During this period, 6 case lose follow from the control group and 2 cases lose follow from the observation group. There was no statistically significant difference of extension restriction angle, flexion angle, knee Lysholm score, and numerical pain score(NRS)score between the two groups before treatment(P>0.05). After treatment, the extension restriction angles of the two groups were both reduced, which of the observation group was smaller than that in the control group, the flexion angles of the two groups were both enlarged, which of the observation group was larger than that in the control group, the Lysholm scores of the two groups were both increased, which of the observation group was higher than that in the control group, the NRS scores of the two groups were both decreased, which of the observation group was lower than that in the control group(P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the total incidence of adverse events between the two groups(P>0.05). Conclusion:Extracorporeal shock wave combined with manual release to treat knee joint adhesions can effectively improve knee joint mobility, knee joint function, relieve pain, and is safe and reliable.

参考文献/References:


[1] 邢政伟,王健,李和平,等.改良麻醉下手法松解术治疗膝关节粘连的疗效观察[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2019,41(5):373-374.
[2] 洪晓亮,戴杰,满毅,等.关节镜清理联合一期手法松解治疗肩袖撕裂合并冻结肩的临床观察[J].海南医学,2020,31(2):77-80.
[3] 袁改能,施丽燕,万燕杰,等.手法松解术治疗慢性肩袖损伤的临床观察[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2020,28(10):35-42.
[4] XIE X,ZHU J,ZHANG H.Effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in patients with knee osteoarthritis:A cohort study protocol[J].Medicine(Baltimore),2020,99(35):e21749.
[5] MA H,ZHANG W,SHI J,et al.The efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in knee osteoarthritis:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Int J Surg,2020,75:24-34.
[6] 胥少汀,葛宝丰,徐印坎.实用骨科学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2012:18-20.
[7] ARROYO-MORALES M, MARTIN-ALGUACIL J, LOZANO-LOZANO M,et al.The Lysholm score:cross cultural validation and evaluation of psychometric properties of the Spanish version[J].PLoS One,2019,14(8):e0221376.
[8] THONG I S K, JENSEN M P, MIRó J,et al.The validity of pain intensity measures:what do the NRS,VAS,VRS,and FPSR measure[J].Scand J Pain,2018,18(1):99-107.
[9] CHEN H,TAO J,WANG J,et al.Artesunate prevents knee intraarticular adhesion via PRKR-like ER kinase(PERK)signal pathway[J].J Orthop Surg Res,2019,14(1):448-455.
[10] 严攀,付婷婷,李红林,等.中医传统关节粘连松解程序治疗胫骨平台骨折术后膝关节僵硬[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2018,26(3):21-25.
[11] 郑晨颖,赵学千,韦嵩,等.针刀镜联合中医手法松解治疗冻结肩的临床观察[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2019,27(7):14-18.
[12] 朱彤,李静,槐洪波,等.CT引导下高位硬膜外麻醉镇痛联合手法松解治疗粘连性肩关节囊炎[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2018,24(10):795-797.
[13] 杨君,陈剑强,周甜.中医手法松解联合壮骨活血中药促进下肢骨折术后康复的疗效观察[J].中国中医急症,2018,27(3):518-520.
[14] STANIA M, JURAS G, CHMIELEWSKA D,et al.Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for achilles tendinopathy[J].Biomed Res Int,2019,26:3086910.
[15] SUN K,ZHOU H,JIANG W.Extracorporeal shock wave therapy versus other therapeutic methods for chronic plantar fasciitis[J].Foot Ankle Surg,2020,26(1):33-38.
[16] 游昶辉,孙承红,郑婧,等.肩关节手法松解联合局部体外冲击波治疗冻结前期肩周炎的临床效果[J].实用疼痛学杂志,2019,15(5):357-361.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:江苏省自然科学基金面上项目(BK20181150)国家自然科学基金项目(81960899)
△通信作者 E-mail:wangyingsd3@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-06-15