[1]胡赢 谢家豪 李梓灏 黄刚△.单节段腰椎融合术中融合器对腰椎前凸角的影响[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2020,28(12):17-20.
　HU Ying XIE Jiahao LI Zihao HUANG Gang.Effect of the Cage on Lumbar Lordosis in Single-segmentLumbar Interbody Fusion Operation[J].Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics,2020,28(12):17-20.
点击复制

单节段腰椎融合术中融合器对腰椎前凸角的影响()
分享到：

《中国中医骨伤科杂志》[ISSN:1005-0205/CN:42-1340/R]

卷:
第28卷
期数:
2020年12期
页码:
17-20
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2020-12-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of the Cage on Lumbar Lordosis in Single-segmentLumbar Interbody Fusion Operation
文章编号:
1005-0205(2020)12-0017-04
作者:
胡赢1; 2 谢家豪1; 2 李梓灏1; 2 黄刚1; 2△
1广州中医药大学第二临床医学院(广州,510120)2广东省中医院△通信作者 E-mail:279245928@qq.com
Author(s):
HU Ying1; 2 XIE Jiahao1; 2 LI Zihao1; 2 HUANG Gang1; 2△
1The Second Clinical School of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120,China; 2Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120,China.
关键词:
腰椎融合术;  椎间融合器;  中心点比;  后间隙比;  腰椎前凸角
Keywords:
transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion;  cage;  central point ratio;  posterior gap ratio;  lumbar lordosis
分类号:
R681.5
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:探讨单节段经椎间孔入路椎间融合术(TLIF)手术中,椎间融合器(Cage)的位置和大小对融合术后腰椎前凸角(LL)恢复程度及临床疗效的影响。方法:回顾性分析57例因腰椎退行性疾病行L4～5或L5S1单节段TLIF手术的患者。通过腰椎正侧位片测量Cage的中心点比(CPR)、后间隙比(PGR)、椎间隙高度(DH)、手术前后DH变化(ΔDH)、手术节段间前凸角(SLL)、腰椎前凸角。CPR和PGR代表Cage的位置参数,ΔDH为Cage的大小参数。对术后Cage位置、大小参数与SLL和LL差值及临床指标改善值进行相关性分析。结果:全组患者VAS评分、JOA评分、SLL,LL,DH均较术前明显改善,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。CPR和PGR与SLL变化密切正相关(r=0.63,r=0.60,P<0.01),CPR和PGR与LL变化也表现出密切正相关(r=0.39,r=0.39,P<0.01),而ΔDH与SLL和LL变化表现为负相关(r=0.58,r=0.37,P<0.01)。SLL和LL变化与JOA评分改善之间具有相关性(r=0.38,r=0.65,P<0.05),与VAS评分未见明显相关性。结论:在TLIF手术中使Cage适当稍前放置及选用适中大小的Cage可以一定程度改善腰椎前凸,并且提高患者的JOA功能评分。
Abstract:
To investigate the effect of position and size of the cage on the recovery and clinical efficacy of lumbar lordosis(LL)in the single-segment transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(TLIF)operation.Methods:57 patients who underwent L4/5 or L5/S1 single-segment TLIF surgery for degenerative lumbar disease were retrospectively analyzed.Cage central point ratio(CPR),posterior gap ratio(PGR),disc height(DH),DH change before and after operation to ΔDH,surgical section segment lumbar lordosis(SLL),lumbar lordosis were measured by lumbar anterolateral radiograph, CPR and PGR represent the position parameters of cage, and ΔDH is the size parameter of cage.The correlation of postoperative cage position, size parameters and SLL,LL difference and clinical index improvement value was analyzed.Results:The VAS score, JOA score, SLL, LL, and DH of all patients were significantly improved compared with those before operation, and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).CPR, PGR and SLL changes were closely and positively correlated(r=0.63, r=0.60, P<0.01).CPR, PGR and LL changes also showed a close positive correlation(r=0.39, r=0.39, P<0.01), and ΔDH was negatively correlated with changes in SLL and LL(r=-0.58, r=-0.37, P<0.01).There was a correlation between the changes of SLL, LL and the improvement of JOA score(r=0.38, r=0.65, P<0.05), but no significant correlation with VAS.Conclusion:In the TLIF operation, cage placed a little bit ahead and choosing a moderate size cage can improve lumbar lordosis to a certain extent, and improve the patient’s JOA score.

参考文献/References:

[1] KAMLANATHAN V,KIEFFER W K M,ZHU M,et al.Lordosis recreation with PLIF surgery -What Is the influence on adjacent segment Lordosis?-An observational study of radiological alignment change[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2020,doi:10.1097/BRS.00000000000003492.
[2] 马振,张增山,张恒维,等.腰椎后路手术椎间融合器位置与腰椎前凸变化的相关性分析[J].潍坊医学院学报,2018,40(6):417-420.
[3] LANDHAM P R,DON A S,ROBERTSON P A.Do position and size matter? An analysis of cage and placement variables for optimum lordosis in PLIF reconstruction[J].Eur Spine J,2017,26(11):2843-2850.
[4] 陈仲强,刘忠军,党耕町.脊柱外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2013.
[5] TERAGUCHI M,YOSHIMURA N,HASHIZUME H,et al.Progression,incidence,and risk factors for intervertebral disc degeneration in a longitudinal population-based cohort:the Wakayama spine study[J].Osteoarthritis Cartilage,2017,25(7):1122-1131.
[6] VAZIFEHDAN F,KARANTZOULIS V G,IGOUMENOU V G.Sagittal alignment assessment after short-segment lumbar fusion for degenerative disc disease[J].Int Orthop,2019,43(4):891-898.
[7] BERVEN S,WADHWA R.Sagittal Alignment of the Lumbar Spine[J].Neurosurg Clin N Am,2018,29(3):331-339.
[8] DOHERTY J H.Complication of fusion in lumbar scoliosis[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,1973,55-A:438.
[9] DIEBO B G,SHAH N V,BOACHIE-ADJEI O,et al.Adult spinal deformity[J].Lancet,2019,394(10193):160-172.
[10] TEMPEL Z J,GANDHOKE G S,BOLINGER B D,et al.The influence of pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis mismatch on development of symptomatic adjacent level disease following single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion[J].Neurosurgery,2017,80(6):880-886.
[11] VAISHNAV A S,SAVILLE P,MCANANY S,et al.Retrospective review of immediate restoration of lordosis in single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion:a comparison of static and expandable interbody cages[J].Oper Neurosurg(Hagerstown),2020,18(5):518-523.
[12] LOWE T G,TAHERNIA A D.Unilateral transforaminal posterior lumbar interbody fusion[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,2002,394:64-72.
[13] HU Y H,NIU C C,HSIEH M K,et al.Cage positioning as a risk factor for posterior cage migration following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion:an analysis of 953 cases[J].BMC Musculoskelet Disord,2019,20(1):260.
[14] FAUNDEZ A A,MEHBOD A A,WU C,et al.Position of interbody spacer in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion:effect on 3-dimensional stability and sagittal lumbar contour[J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2008,21(3):175-180.
[15] KEPLER C K,RIHN J A,RADCLIFF K E,et al.Restoration of lordosis and disk height after single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion[J].Orthop Surg,2012,4(1):15-20.
[2] 马振,张增山,张恒维,等.腰椎后路手术椎间融合器位置与腰椎前凸变化的相关性分析[J].潍坊医学院学报,2018,40(6):417-420.
[3] LANDHAM P R,DON A S,ROBERTSON P A.Do position and size matter? An analysis of cage and placement variables for optimum lordosis in PLIF reconstruction[J].Eur Spine J,2017,26(11):2843-2850.
[4] 陈仲强,刘忠军,党耕町.脊柱外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2013.
[5] TERAGUCHI M,YOSHIMURA N,HASHIZUME H,et al.Progression,incidence,and risk factors for intervertebral disc degeneration in a longitudinal population-based cohort:the Wakayama spine study[J].Osteoarthritis Cartilage,2017,25(7):1122-1131.
[6] VAZIFEHDAN F,KARANTZOULIS V G,IGOUMENOU V G.Sagittal alignment assessment after short-segment lumbar fusion for degenerative disc disease[J].Int Orthop,2019,43(4):891-898.
[7] BERVEN S,WADHWA R.Sagittal Alignment of the Lumbar Spine[J].Neurosurg Clin N Am,2018,29(3):331-339.
[8] DOHERTY J H.Complication of fusion in lumbar scoliosis[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,1973,55-A:438.
[9] DIEBO B G,SHAH N V,BOACHIE-ADJEI O,et al.Adult spinal deformity[J].Lancet,2019,394(10193):160-172.
[10] TEMPEL Z J,GANDHOKE G S,BOLINGER B D,et al.The influence of pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis mismatch on development of symptomatic adjacent level disease following single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion[J].Neurosurgery,2017,80(6):880-886.
[11] VAISHNAV A S,SAVILLE P,MCANANY S,et al.Retrospective review of immediate restoration of lordosis in single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion:a comparison of static and expandable interbody cages[J].Oper Neurosurg(Hagerstown),2020,18(5):518-523.
[12] LOWE T G,TAHERNIA A D.Unilateral transforaminal posterior lumbar interbody fusion[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,2002,394:64-72.
[13] HU Y H,NIU C C,HSIEH M K,et al.Cage positioning as a risk factor for posterior cage migration following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion:an analysis of 953 cases[J].BMC Musculoskelet Disord,2019,20(1):260.
[14] FAUNDEZ A A,MEHBOD A A,WU C,et al.Position of interbody spacer in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion:effect on 3-dimensional stability and sagittal lumbar contour[J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2008,21(3):175-180.
[15] KEPLER C K,RIHN J A,RADCLIFF K E,et al.Restoration of lordosis and disk height after single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion[J].Orthop Surg,2012,4(1):15-20.

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-12-15