[1]郑志辉 蔡沛彪 关可立 李晓武 曾庆强△.撬拨复位微创置板内固定术治疗跟骨骨折的临床观察[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2020,28(07):33-37.
　ZHENG Zhihui CAI Peibiao GUAN Keli LI Xiaowu ZENG Qingqiang.Clinical Analysis of Treatment of Calcaneal Fractures With Percutaneous Reduction by Leverage Combined With Minimally Invasive Internal Fixation[J].Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics,2020,28(07):33-37.
点击复制

撬拨复位微创置板内固定术治疗跟骨骨折的临床观察()
分享到：

《中国中医骨伤科杂志》[ISSN:1005-0205/CN:42-1340/R]

卷:
第28卷
期数:
2020年07期
页码:
33-37
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2020-07-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical Analysis of Treatment of Calcaneal Fractures With Percutaneous Reduction by Leverage Combined With Minimally Invasive Internal Fixation
文章编号:
1005-0205(2020)07-0033-05
作者:
郑志辉1 蔡沛彪1 关可立1 李晓武1 曾庆强1△
1广东省汕头市中医医院骨二科(广东 汕头,515031)
Author(s):
ZHENG Zhihui1 CAI Peibiao1 GUAN Keli1 LI Xiaowu1 ZENG Qingqiang1△
1The Second Department of Orthopaedics,Shantou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Shantou 515031,Guangdong China.
关键词:
跟骨骨折;  撬拨复位;  微创置板内固定
Keywords:
calcaneal fracture;  Sanders Ⅱ; Ⅲ;  percutaneous reduction by leverage;  minimally invasive internal fixation
分类号:
R683.42
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:观察撬拨复位微创置板内固定术治疗SandersⅡ,Ⅲ型跟骨骨折的临床疗效。方法:选取2016年1月至2019年1月SandersⅡ,Ⅲ型跟骨骨折患者共50例,其中SandersⅡ型26例(A组),SandersⅢ型24例(B组),均采用闭合撬拨复位微创置板内固定治疗。按足部功能评分(AOFAS评分)系统评价术后6个月(或末次随访)的临床疗效,对比分析患者术前、术后第1天及术后6个月(或末次随访)的Böhler角及Gissane角,统计手术并发症。结果:50例患者均获得随访,随访时间5～7个月,平均(6.0±0.2)个月。末次随访AOFAS评分A组为88.5±8.6,B组为89.4±9.1,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),总评分为89.2±8.9。优良率:A组为92.3%,B组为95.8%,差异有统计学意义(P>0.05),总优良率94.0%。两组术后第1天及术后6个月(或末次随访)Böhler角及Gissane角均较术前明显改善,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),术后6个月较术后第1天Böhler角及Gissane角均有不同程度的丢失,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05); 术后第1天A组Böhler角及Gissane角均优于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。A组并发症发生率为11.5%,B组为12.5%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),总发生率为12%。结论:对于粉碎程度重、移位明显的Sanders Ⅲ型跟骨骨折,运用撬拨复位微创置板内固定可取得与SandersⅡ型一样满意的临床疗效,虽然Ⅱ型骨折较Ⅲ型骨折术后角度改善更好,但其优良率和并发症差异并无统计学意义。
Abstract:
Objective:To observe and analyze the clinical efficacy of percutaneous reduction by leverage combined with minimally invasive internal fixation in treating Sanders type Ⅱ and Ⅲ calcaneal fractures. Methods:From January 2016 to January 2019,50 patients with type Ⅱ and Ⅲ calcaneal fractures in the second department of orthopaedics of Shantou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine were selected. There were 26 cases of Sanders type Ⅱ(group A)and 24 cases of Sanders type Ⅲ(group B). All patients were treated with percutaneous reduction by leverage combined with minimally invasive internal fixation. The clinical efficacy of 6 months after operation(or the last follow-up)was systematically evaluated according to the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society(AOFAS)score.The Böhler angle and Gissane angle of the patients before operation,the first day after operation and 6 months after operation(or the last follow-up)were compared and analyzed,and the complications of the operation were documented. Results:All 50 patients were followed up for 5 to 7 months with average of 6 months. The score:AOFAS score of the last follow-up in group A was 88.5±8.6 and group B was 89.4±9.1(P>0.05),and the total score was 89.2±8.9; the excellent and good rate was 92.3% in group A and 95.8% in group B(P>0.05),and the excellent and good rate was 94.0%. The angle:the angle of the two groups was significantly improved(P<0.05)1 d and 6 months after the operation(or the last follow-up). Compared with Böhler angle and Gissane angle of the first day after operation,they were lost in different degrees at 6 months later,but there was no significant difference(P>0.05). Böhler angle and Gissane angle in group A on the first day after operation were better than those in group B(P<0.05). Complications:the complication rate of group A was 11.5%,12.5% in group B(P>0.05),and the total incidence was 12%. Conclusion:For severely crushed,displaced Sanders Ⅲ calcaneus fractures,the treatment of Sanders Ⅱ and Ⅲ calcaneus fractures with percutaneous reduction by leverage combined with minimally invasive internal fixation is satisfied. Although the postoperative angle of type Ⅱ fracture is better than that of type Ⅲ fracture,there is no significant difference in the excellent,good rate and complication.

参考文献/References:

[1] WALLIN K J,COZZETTO D,RUSSELL L,et al.Evidence-based rationale for percutaneous fixation technique of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures:a systematic review of clinical outcome[J].Foot Ankle Surg,2014,53(6):740-743.
[2] EPSTEIN N,CHANDRAN S,CHOU L.Current concepts review:intraarticu-lar fractures of the calcaneus[J].Foot Ankle Int,2012,33(1):79-86.
[3] LUO X,LI Q,HE S,et al.Operative versus nonoperative treatment for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures:a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J].J Foot Ankle Surg,2016,55(4):821-828.
[4] ZHANG W,LIN F,CHEN E,et al.Operative versus nonoperative treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures:a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J].J Orthop Trauma,2016,30(3):75-81.
[5] 郭琰,周方,田耘,等.闭合复位微创接骨板内固定治疗跟骨骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2015,17(3):238-242.
[6] YAO H,LIANG T,XU Y,et al.Sinus tarsi approach versus extensile lateral approach for displaced intra articular calcaneal fracture:a meta analysis of current evidence base[J].J Orthop Surg Res,2017,12(1):43.
[7] KONG C G,GUO X,WU D Q.Internal fixation with locking plate and nail for treating Sanders Ⅲ calcaneal fractures:one-year follow-up of modified“L-shape”incislon and bone graft versus“L-shape”incision without bone gratft[J].Chinese J of Tissue Eng Res,2019,23(16):2500-2505.
[8] POEZE M,VERBRUGGEN J P,BRINK P R. The relationship between theoutcome of operatively treated calcaneal fractures and institutional fracture load:a systematic review of the literature[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2008,90(5):1013-1021.
[9] 凌泽文.经皮撬拨复位克氏针内固定和切开复位钢板内固定治疗SandersⅡ型跟骨骨折的效果对比[J].中国医药科学,2018,8(18):226-229.
[10] 曾凡辉,涂淑强,帅永明,等.经皮撬拨复位空心钉与跗骨窦切口钢板内固定治疗跟骨骨折的比较[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2018,33(6):653-655.
[11] GRIFFIN D,PARSONS N,SHAW E,et al. Operative versus non-operative treatment for closed,displaced,intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus:randomised controlled trial[J].BMJ,2014,349:g4483.
[12] 武勇.跟骨骨折的治疗进展[J].中国骨伤,2017,30(12):1077-1079.
[13] 刘亮,周恩瑜,陈宇.经皮撬拨复位空心螺钉内固定Sanders Ⅱ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折[J].局解手术学杂志,2018,27(8):581-585.
[14] 俞光荣,燕晓宇.跟骨骨折治疗方法的选择[J].中华骨科杂志,2006,26(2):134-141.
[15] BERGIN P F,PSARADELLIS T,KROSIN M T,et al.Inpatient soft tissue protocol and wound complications in calcaneus fractures[J].Foot Ankle Int,2012,33(6):492-497.
[16] 穆臣会,郭氧,林山,等.小切口微型钢板结合不同螺钉固定治疗跟骨粉碎性骨折的疗效观察[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2019,27(7):37-40.
[17] LIM E V,LEUNG J P.Complications of intraarticular calcaneal fracture[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,2001,10(39):7-16.
[18] BACKES M,SCHEPERS T,BEEREKAMP M S,et al.Wound infections following open reduction and internal fixation of calcaneal fractures with an extended lateral approach[J].Int Orthop,2014,38(4):767-773.
[19] LIU W H,MA Y,YU B B,et al.Surgical versus conservative interventions for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures:a cochrane nursing care field corner column[J].Orthopaedic Nursing,2013,32(6):336-337.
[20] 王伟军,邹季,杨傲飞,等.跟骨骨折外侧切口并发症的原因分析与对策[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2018,26(5):55-56.
[21] 陈光友,丁辉,姜铧财,等.持续牵引下经皮撬拔复位螺钉固定治疗跟骨骨折48例[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2019,27(5):64-65.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
(收稿日期:2020-01-07) △通信作者 E-mail:89000231@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-07-10