[1]詹吉恒 林定坤△ 王羽丰 苏国义 侯宇.腰椎后路内固定术后邻近节段退变与脊柱-骨盆矢状位参数的相关性分析[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2019,27(02):17-20.
　ZHAN Jiheng LIN Dingkun WANG Yufeng SU Guoyi HOU Yu.Correlation Analysis of Adjacent Segment Degeneration and SpinopelvicSagittal Parameters after Posterior Lumbar Internal Fixation[J].Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics,2019,27(02):17-20.
点击复制

腰椎后路内固定术后邻近节段退变与脊柱-骨盆矢状位参数的相关性分析()
分享到：

《中国中医骨伤科杂志》[ISSN:1005-0205/CN:42-1340/R]

卷:
第27卷
期数:
2019年02期
页码:
17-20
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2019-02-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Correlation Analysis of Adjacent Segment Degeneration and SpinopelvicSagittal Parameters after Posterior Lumbar Internal Fixation
文章编号:
1005-0205(2019)02-0017-04
作者:
詹吉恒1 林定坤2△ 王羽丰2 苏国义2 侯宇2
1广州中医药大学(广州,510405)2广东省中医院骨一科
Author(s):
ZHAN Jiheng1 LIN Dingkun2△ WANG Yufeng2 SU Guoyi2 HOU Yu2
1Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405,China; 2Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120,China.
关键词:
腰椎后路内固定术;  邻近节段退变;  脊柱-骨盆矢状位参数;  相关性
Keywords:
posterior lumbar interbody fusion;  adjacent segment degeneration;  spinopelvic sagittal parameters;  correlation analysis
分类号:
R681.5
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
探讨腰椎后路内固定术后邻近节段退变与脊柱-骨盆矢状位参数的相关性。方法:自2010年1月至2014年12月,纳入符合标准的因退变性疾病行腰椎后路内固定术患者84例:男40例,女44例; 年龄36～85岁,平均(63.6±8.9)岁。采用疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)及日本骨科协会评估治疗分数(JOA)评估手术疗效,分别测量手术邻近节段的椎间隙高度及腰椎活动度了解退变情况,并测量腰椎前凸角(LL)、骨盆入射角(PI)、术前骨盆入射角与腰椎前凸角差值(△PILL)。对上述脊柱-骨盆矢状位参数与术后邻近节段退变发生率进行相关性分析。结果:平均随访46.2个月,共有34例患者邻近节段发生影像学退变,发生率为40.48%.其中术后邻近节段退变组与无退变组的LL在手术前后分别比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05); 而术后邻近节段退变组的术前PI,术前△PILL均大于无退变组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05); 术前PI,术前△PILL与术后邻近节段退变呈显著正相关(r=0.572,r=0.738)。结论:脊柱-骨盆矢状位参数与腰椎后路内固定术后邻近节段退变的发生密切相关,术前PI及△PILL越大的患者,术后更易于发生邻近节段退变。
Abstract:
To investigate the correlationship between adjacent segment degeneration and spinopelvic sagittal parameters after posterior lumbar internal fixation. Methods: 84 patients(40 males, 44 females, aged 36～85 years, average(63.6±8.9)years)who met the inclusion criteria from January 2010 to December 2014 were enrolled. The visual analogue scale(VAS)and Japanese orthopaedic association(JOA)scores were used to evaluate the efficacy of surgical treatment. The height of the intervertebral space and the range of motion(ROM)of adjacent segments were measured to access the degeneration status of lumbar spine. The lumbar lordosis(LL), pelvic incidence(PI), and preoperative △PILL(△PILL=PI-LL)were measured. Then analyze the correlationship between the spinopelvic sagittal parameters and incidence of postoperative adjacent segment degeneration. Results: 1)After an average follow-up of 46.2 months, a total of 34 patients developed adjacent segment degeneration(ASDeg), with an incidence of 40.48%. 2)There was no significant difference in the LL between the ASDeg group and the non-ASDeg group either before or after surgery(P>0.05). 3)The preoperative PI and preoperative △PILL were larger in the ASDeg group than that in the non-ASDeg group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). 4)There was a significant positive correlation between preoperative PI and preoperative △PILL and postoperative adjacent segment degeneration(r=0.572,r=0.738). Conclusion: The spinopelvic sagittal parameters are closely related to the occurrence of adjacent segment degeneration after posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Patients with large preoperative PI and preoperative △PILL were more likely to develop adjacent segment degeneration after surgery.

参考文献/References:

[1] KONG L D,ZHANG Y Z,WANG F,et al.Radiographic restoration of sagittal spinopelvic alignment after posterior lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative spondylolisthesis[J].Clin Spine Surg,2016,29(2):87-92.
[2] SAKAURA H,MIWA T,YAMASHITA T,et al.Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screw fixation versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion using traditional pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis:a comparative study[J].J Neurosurg Spine,2016,25(5):591-595.
[3] LAN T,HU S Y,ZHANG Y T,et al.Comparison between posterior lumbar Interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].World Neurosurg,2018,112:86-93.
[4] MATSUMOTO T,OKUDA S,MAENO T,et al.Spinopelvic sagittal imbalance as a risk factor for adjacent-segment disease after single-segment posterior lumbar interbody fusion[J].J Neurosurg Spine,2017,26(4):435-440.
[5] DI MARTINO A,QUATTROCCHI C C,SCARCIOLLA L,et al.Estimating the risk for symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar fusion:analysis from a cohort of patients undergoing revision surgery[J].Eur Spine J,2014,23(6):693-698.
[6] MOREAU P E,FERRERO E,RIOUALLON G,et al.Radiologic adjacent segment degeneration 2 years after lumbar fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis[J].Orthop Traumatol Surg Res,2016,102(6):759-763.
[7] ANDERSON C E.Spondyloschisis following spine fusion[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,1956,38-A(5):1142-1146.
[8] LE HUEC J C,FAUNDEZ A,DOMINGUEZ D,et al.Evidence showing the relationship between sagittal balance and clinical outcomes in surgical treatment of degenerative spinal diseases:a literature review[J].Int Orthop,2015,39(1):87-95.
[9] DOHZONO S,TOYODA H,MATSUMOTO T,et al.The influence of preoperative spinal sagittal balance on clinical outcomes after microendoscopic laminotomy in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis[J].J Neurosurg Spine,2015,23(1):49-54.
[10] CHANG D G,HA K Y,KIM Y H,et al.Spinopelvic alignment by different surgical methods in the treatment of degenerative sagittal imbalance of the lumbar spine[J].Clin Spine Surg,2017,30(4):E390-E397.
[11] KIM M K,LEE S H,KIM E S,et al.The impact of sagittal balance on clinical results after posterior interbody fusion for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis:a pilot study[J].BMC Musculoskelet Disord,2011,12(1):69.
[12] WEINHOFFER S L,GUYER R D,HERBERT M,et al.Intradiscal pressure measurements above an instrumented fusion:a cadaveric study[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),1995,20(5):526-531.
[13] LEE C K.Accelerated degeneration of the segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),1988,13(3):375-377.
[14] 汪凌骏,顾勇,冯煜,等.脊柱-骨盆矢状面形态变化与椎间盘摘除及后路椎体间植骨融合的关系[J].中国组织工程研究,2015,19(29):4598-4602.
[15] MAC-THIONG J M,LABELLE H,BERTHONNAUD E,et al.Sagittal spinopelvic balance in normal children and adolescents[J].Eur Spine J,2007,16(2):227-234.
[16] ROTHENFLUH D A,MUELLER D A,ROTHENFLUH E,et al.Pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch predisposes to adjacent segment disease after lumbar spinal fusion[J].Eur Spine J,2015,24(6):1251-1258.
[17] SCHWAB F J,BLONDEL B,BESS S,et al.Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity:a prospective multicenter analysis[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2013,38(13):803-812.
[18] NAKASHIMA H,KAWAKAMI N,TSUJI T,et al.Adjacent segment disease after posterior lumbar interbody fusion:based on cases with a minimum of 10 years of follow-up[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2015,40(14):E831-E841.
[19] KAITO T,HOSONO N,MUKAI Y,et al.Induction of early degeneration of the adjacent segment after posterior lumbar interbody fusion by excessive distraction of lumbar disc space[J].J Neurosurg Spine,2010,12(6):671-679.
[20] 李危石,孙卓然,陈仲强.正常脊柱-骨盆矢状位参数的影像学研究[J].中华骨科杂志,2013,33(5):447-453.
[21] 陈涛,黎观保,梁科友,等.脊柱-骨盆矢状面平衡及其在脊柱疾病治疗中的作用[J].中国组织工程研究,2013,17(13):2423-2430.
[22] 付刚,韩德韬.腰椎“悬浮固定”术后L5S1退变的影响因素分析[J].创伤与急诊电子杂志,2013,1(3):30-34.
[23] YAMASAKI K,HOSHINO M,OMORI K,et al.Risk factors of adjacent segment disease after transforaminal inter-body fusion for degenerative lumbar disease[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2017,42(2):86-92.
[24] MATSUMOTO T,OKUDA S,MAENO T,et al.Spinopelvic sagittal imbalance as a risk factor for adjacent-segment disease after single-segment posterior lumbar interbody fusion[J].J Neurosurg Spine,2017,26(4):435-440.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
1广州中医药大学(广州,510405)2广东省中医院骨一科△通信作者 E-mail:lindingkun@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-02-15