[1]沈潇,沈学强,严峥,等.吴门医派非手术治疗锁骨中段粉碎性骨折的疗效观察[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2025,33(01):33-36+41.[doi:10.20085/j.cnki.issn1005-0205.250107]
　SHEN Xiao,SHEN Xueqiang,YAN Zheng,et al.Efficacy Observation of Wumen Medical School Non-Surgical Treatment on the Treatment of Midclavicular Comminted Fracture[J].Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics,2025,33(01):33-36+41.[doi:10.20085/j.cnki.issn1005-0205.250107]
点击复制

吴门医派非手术治疗锁骨中段粉碎性骨折的疗效观察()
分享到：

《中国中医骨伤科杂志》[ISSN:1005-0205/CN:42-1340/R]

卷:
第33卷
期数:
2025年01期
页码:
33-36+41
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2025-01-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Efficacy Observation of Wumen Medical School Non-Surgical Treatment on the Treatment of Midclavicular Comminted Fracture
文章编号:
1005-0205(2025)01-0033-04
作者:
沈潇1; 沈学强1; 严峥1; 袁诚啸1; 龚冠亦1; 许苏梁1; 骆川1; 姜宏1; 刘锦涛1△
1南京中医药大学附属苏州市中医医院(江苏 苏州,215009)
Author(s):
SHEN Xiao1; SHEN Xueqiang1; YAN Zheng1; YUAN Chengxiao1; GONG Guanyi1; XU Suliang1; LUO Chuan1; JIANG Hong1; LIU Jintao1△
1Suzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine,Suzhou 215009,Jiangsu China.
关键词:
锁骨中段粉碎性骨折;  吴门伤科;  非手术治疗;  钢板内固定
Keywords:
midclavicle comminuted fracture;  Wumen traumatology;  non-surgical treatment;  plate internal fixation
分类号:
R683.41
DOI:
10.20085/j.cnki.issn1005-0205.250107
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:分析比较吴门医派非手术治疗与钢板内固定治疗锁骨中段粉碎性骨折的临床疗效。方法:选择2021年6月至2023年6月期间,以采用吴门医派非手术治疗或锁骨钢板内固定治疗的96例锁骨中段粉碎性骨折患者作为研究对象。根据样本量估算:观察组48例,采用吴门医派非手术治疗锁骨中段粉碎性骨折; 对照组48例,采用切开复位钢板内固定治疗锁骨中段粉碎性骨折。对两组患者疼痛评分、肩关节功能评分、并发症等指标进行分析评定。结果:所有患者均接受完整的随访观察,平均随访时间为(9.21±1.24)个月; 夹板固定治疗后与手术钢板内固定术后肩关节疼痛均随恢复时间增长而减轻,且在治疗9个月后疼痛差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两种治疗方式下肩关节活动度均随时间延长而提升,在3个月后,手术钢板内固定患者的肩关节活动度略高于夹板固定治疗的患者。两种治疗方式在治疗9个月后肩关节活动度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组患者中4例因绷带缠绕过紧而产生焦虑、头晕等不适,予对症处理后症状缓解或消失; 7例出现骨折畸形愈合,对肩关节功能无影响; 其余未见并发症。对照组48例患者中有3例出现骨折不愈合。结论:吴门伤科锁骨夹板外固定可缓解骨折初期疼痛,避免切开复位的二次伤害,在不考虑畸形愈合的情况下,相较于切开复位钢板内固定,吴门医派非手术治疗针对锁骨中段粉碎性骨折具有较好的治疗效果,可作为锁骨中段粉碎性骨折的推荐治疗方式。
Abstract:
Objective:To analyze and compare the clinical efficacy of Wumen medical school non-surgical treatment and plate internal fixation on the treatment of midclavicular comminted fracture.Methods:96 patients with midclavicular comminted fracture who were treated with Wumen medical school non-surgical treatment or plate internal fixation during June 2021 to June 2023 were selected as research objects.According to sample size estimation,48 patients in the observation group were treated with Wumen medical school non-surgical treatment for midclavicular comminted fracture,and 48 patients in the control group was treated with open reduction plate internal fixation.The pain score,shoulder joint function score,complications and other indicators of the two groups were analyzed and evaluated.Results:All patients received complete follow-up observation,the average follow-up time was(9.21±1.24)months.Shoulder joint pain after splint treatment and plate internal fixation decreased with the increase of recovery time,and there was no significant difference in pain after 9 months after treatment.In both groups,shoulder joint motion increased with time.After 3 months,shoulder joint motion was slightly higher after plate fixation than that after splint treatment.There was no significant difference in shoulder motion between the two groups after 9 months.In the observation group,4 patients had anxiety,dizziness and other discomfort due to tight bandage wrapping.After symptomatic treatment,the symptoms were relieved or disappeared.Fracture malunion occurred in 7 cases and had no effect on shoulder joint function.No major complications were observed.In the control group,3 of the 48 cases had fracture nonunion.Conclusion:External clavicular splint fixation in Wumen medical school can relieve the initial pain of fracture and avoid the secondary injury of open reduction.In the case of malunion,compared with open reduction plate internal fixation,non-surgical treatment in Wumen medical school has a better treatment efficacy for midclavicular comminuted fracture and can be used as a treatment method for midclavicular comminuted fracture.

参考文献/References:

[1] POSTACCHINI F,GUMINA S,DE SANTIS P,et al.Epidemiology of clavicle fractures[J].Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery,2002,11(5):452-456.
[2] 朱兴涛,孙轶韬,孙一夫,等.锁骨中段骨折分型及可塑性夹板治疗的临床观察[J].中国骨伤,2022,35(3):258-264.
[3] 朱兴涛,孙轶韬,姜宏,等.吴门医派可塑性夹板与钢板内固定治疗RobinsonⅡB型锁骨中段骨折的临床效果[J].中国医药导报,2022,19(30):92-95.
[4] 张细祥,郭颖彬.弹性髓内钉与锁定钢板治疗锁骨中段骨折的疗效比较[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2023,31(12):38-42.
[5] 朱明雨,张勇,范永红.肩关节镜下肩袖修复术治疗肩袖损伤的临床疗效分析[J].中外医疗,2019,38(19):25-27.
[6] 覃剑,闵洁,段海萍,等.高频超声全程引导下汉派骨伤三联疗法在肩周炎患者中的应用及对Constant-Murley肩关节评分的影响[J].四川中医,2020,38(5):142-144.
[7] 曹锦辉,黄轶锋,王权.老年患者锁骨中段骨折保守治疗和手术治疗临床疗效比较[J].浙江医学教育,2019,18(3):53-55.
[8] QVIST A H,VAESEL M T,MOSS C,et al.No need to use both disabilities of the arm,shoulder and hand and Constant-Murley score in studies of midshaft clavicular fractures[J].Acta Orthop,2020,91(6):789-793.
[9] 李全辉,朱鉴,卢浩,等.保守与手术治疗老年性锁骨中段移位骨折的疗效比较[J].医学信息,2019,32(19):109-111.
[10] 解建华.锁骨骨折保守治疗与手术治疗的比较[J].实用医技杂志,2010,17(2):150-151.
[11] 李恩琪,袁天祥,马宝通,等.锁骨骨折手术治疗与并发症控制研究进展[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2013,21(20):1350-1352.
[12] 徐招跃,袁临益,杨巧燕.锁骨骨折保守与手术治疗的比较研究[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2014,22(6):37-40.
[13] 杨帆,王东,孙海钰,等.锁骨骨折植入物内固定与保守治疗效果比较的Meta分析[J].中国组织工程研究,2014,18(22):3567-3573.
[14] 王江平,王震,李宇卫,等.吴门医派正骨手法复位小夹板固定联合肢体远端牵引治疗老年桡骨远端骨折的临床研究[J].云南中医中药杂志,2022,43(3):41-43.
[15] 熊伟.《仙授理伤续断秘方》中的正骨外治法[J].湖北中医杂志,2015,37(4):36-37.
[16] 李稳超,李红卫,张先达,等.吴门医派手法治疗胸腰椎压缩性骨折临床研究[J].中医药临床杂志,2024,36(1):172-177.
[17] 郑水长,张绍安,魏新军,等.锁骨骨折内固定术后感染的原因分析及治疗策略[J].中国社区医师,2014,30(20):76-77.
[18] 于大鹏,王英华,聂伟志.锁骨骨折闭合复位克氏针内固定治疗研究进展[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2020,28(6):85-88.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:江苏省老中医药专家学术经验继承项目(苏中医科教〔2021〕7号)
江苏省第三批中医药领军人才项目(苏中医科教〔2023〕9号)
中医骨伤重点实验室建设项目(SZS2022019)
江苏省科教能力提升工程:江苏省医学重点学科/实验室建设单位项目(苏卫科教〔2022〕17号)
苏州市“科教兴卫”青年科技项目(KJXW2023047)
△通信作者 E-mail:okdoctor@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2025-01-15