[1]董延旭,金立昆,金桥,等.改良弧形扩大跗骨窦入路治疗跟骨骨折临床研究[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2024,32(04):49-54.[doi:10.20085/j.cnki.issn1005-0205.240410]
　DONG Yanxu,JIN Likun,JIN Qiao,et al.Clinical Study of Modified Arc Extended Tarsal Sinus Approach on the Treatment of Patients with Calcaneal Fractures[J].Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics,2024,32(04):49-54.[doi:10.20085/j.cnki.issn1005-0205.240410]
点击复制

改良弧形扩大跗骨窦入路治疗跟骨骨折临床研究()
分享到：

《中国中医骨伤科杂志》[ISSN:1005-0205/CN:42-1340/R]

卷:
第32卷
期数:
2024年04期
页码:
49-54
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2024-04-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical Study of Modified Arc Extended Tarsal Sinus Approach on the Treatment of Patients with Calcaneal Fractures
文章编号:
1005-0205(2024)04-0049-06
作者:
董延旭1; 金立昆1; 金桥2; 张杰1; 孙新1; 侯云杰1; 戴禹润1; 李晔1△
1北京市丰盛中医骨伤专科医院(北京,100039)
2北京市宣武中医院
Author(s):
DONG Yanxu1; JIN Likun1; JIN Qiao2; ZHANG Jie1; SUN Xin1; HOU Yunjie1; DAI Yurun1; LI Ye1△
1Beijing Fengsheng Traditional Chinese Medicine Orthopedic Hospital,Beijing 100039,China; 2Beijing Xuanwu Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital,Beijing 100050,China.
关键词:
跟骨骨折;  改良跗骨窦入路;  微创内固定术
Keywords:
calcaneal fracture;  modified arc extended tarsal sinus approach;  minimally invasive surgery
分类号:
R683.42
DOI:
10.20085/j.cnki.issn1005-0205.240410
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:观察改良弧形扩大跗骨窦入路治疗SandersⅡ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折的临床疗效及安全性。方法:选取2021年6月至2023年1月收治的SandersⅡ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折患者的临床资料共56例,按手术方式分为改良弧形扩大跗骨窦入路组(28例)和跗骨窦入路组(28例)。所有患者术前、术后定期摄片,比较两组患者受伤至手术时间间隔、手术时间、切口长度、出血量、跟骨长度、宽度、高度、Bohler角、Gissane角、跟骨内翻角、切口愈合时间、骨折愈合时间、美国足踝外科协会(AOFAS)踝-后足评分量表评分。记录两种手术方式术后并发症。结果:两组患者均顺利完成手术,无严重神经、血管损伤并发症。改良弧形扩大跗骨窦入路组术中的手术时间、出血量均显著优于跗骨窦入路组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。改良弧形扩大跗骨窦入路组的切口长度显著长于跗骨窦入路组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者受伤至手术时间间隔、跟骨长度、宽度、高度、Bohler角、Gissane角、跟骨内翻角、切口愈合时间、骨折愈合时间、踝-后足评分量表评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:改良弧形扩大跗骨窦入路治疗SandersⅡ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折切口愈合好,手术时间缩短,出血量减少,临床治疗效果满意。
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the curative efficacy and safety of modified arc extended tarsal sinus approach on the treatment of patients with Sanders Ⅱ,Ⅲ calcaneal fractures.Methods:56 patients with Sanders Ⅱ,Ⅲ calcaneal fractures were chosen as the research object from June 2021 to January 2023.They were randomly divided into modified arc extended tarsal sinus approach group(28 patients)and tarsal sinus approach group(28 patients)according to random number table.All patients were radiographed regularly before and after surgery.The time waiting for surgery,operative time,incision length,intraoperative blood loss,calcaneal length,width,height,Bolher angle,Gissane angle,calcaneus varus angle,incision healing time,fracture healing time and American orthopaedic foot and ankle society(AOFAS)scores were observed and compared between the two groups.Postoperative complications were recorded.Results:Both groups successfully completed the operation without serious neurological and vascular injury complications.The operative time,intraoperative blood loss in the modified arc extended tarsal sinus approach group were less than those in the tarsal sinus approach group(P<0.05).The incision length in the modified arc extended tarsal sinus approach group were longer than those in the tarsal sinus approach group(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the time waiting for surgery,calcaneal length,width,height,Bolher angle,Gissane angle,calcaneus varus angle,incision healing time,fracture healing time and AOFAS scores in both group(P>0.05).Conclusion:Compared with the tarsal sinus approach,modified arc extended tarsal sinus approach make fracture incision healed well,reduce the operation time and intraoperative blood loss.The curative efficacy was satisfactory.

参考文献/References:

[1] 何桂松,戈涛.经跗骨窦切口微创钢板内固定治疗跟骨骨折疗效分析[J].临床骨科杂志,2019,22(3):366-368.
[2] ALMEIDA J F,VALE C,GONZALEZ T,et al.Osteosynthesis or primary arthrodesis for displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures Sanders type Ⅳ:a systematic review[J].Foot Ankle Surg,2022,28(3):281-287.
[3] ZENG Z,YUAN L,ZHENG S,et al. Minimally invasive versus extensile lateral approach for Sanders typeⅡand Ⅲ calcaneal fractures:a meta analysis of randomized controlled trials[J].Int J Surg,2018,50(4):146-153.
[4] 吴亚兵,刘国辉,刘梦非.经跗骨窦入路治疗SandersⅡ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折25例[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2022,30(3):65-69.
[5] 石学文,李胜堂,高余,等.跟骨骨折术后切口并发症发生的危险因素及防治策略[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2022,30(8):717-721.
[6] TAKASAKA M,BITTAR C K,MENNUCCI F S,et al.Comparative study on three surgical techniques for intra-articular calcaneal fractures:open reduction with internal fixation using a plate,external fixation and minimally invasive surgery[J].Rev Bras Ortop,2016,51(3):254-260.
[7] 马超,王成伟,唐国柱.微创技术与开放手术治疗SandersⅡ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折的疗效比较[J].中华骨科杂志,2020,40(21):1443-1452.
[8] 王丛,胡俊,靳鹏,等.合并胸腰椎骨折的双侧跟骨骨折手术疗效分析[J].临床研究,2020,28(5):38-40.
[9] 王宝鹏,常西海,李光磊,等.两种切口内固定治疗SandersⅡ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折的比较[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2020,28(10):897-901.
[10] KHAZEN G,RASSI C K.Sinus tarsi approach for calcaneal fractures:the new gold standard[J].Foot Ankle Clin North Am,2020,25(4):667-681.
[11] MENG Q,WANG Q,WU X,et al. Clinical application of the sinus tarsi approach in the treatment of intra articular calcaneal fracture[J].Medicine(Baltimore),2018,97(13):175-180.
[12] SAB M,ROTTER R,MITTLMEIER T.Minimally invasive internal fixation of calcaneal fractures or subtalar joint arthrodesis using the calcanail[J].Oper Orthop Traumatol,2019,31(2):149-164.
[13] 邹光翼,梁伟,俞桂松,等.改良跗骨窦入路斜T形锁定钢板内固定治疗SandersⅡ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折[J].中医正骨,2023,35(3):225-232.
[14] PENG C,YUAN B,GUO W,et al.Extensile lateral versus sinustarsi approach for calcaneal fractures:a meta-analysis[J].Medicine(Baltimore),2021,100(31):e26717.
[15] 张金福,叶剑刚,吴金华,等.跗骨窦入路克氏针内固定治疗跟骨骨折[J].临床骨科杂志,2021,24(1):142-145.
[16] 王秉璞,王大玉,张本结,等.跟骨骨折中跗骨窦入路与外侧延长切口入路治疗效果及影像学参数比较[J].中国骨与关节杂志,2022,11(9):682-689.
[17] 白求恩骨科加速康复联盟,白求恩公益基金会创伤骨科专业委员会,白求恩公益基金会关节外科专业委员会,等.加速康复外科理念下跟骨关节内骨折诊疗规范专家共识[J].中华骨与关节外科杂志,2020,13(2):97-108.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:北京市西城区财政科技专项(XCSTS-TI2022-35)
△通信作者 E-mail:yebengli@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-04-15