[1]施丽燕,袁改能,刘薛峰,等.密集型银质针联合手法松解术治疗慢性肩袖损伤的临床研究[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2023,31(11):37-40+46.[doi:10.20085/j.cnki.issn1005-0205.231107]
　SHI Liyan,YUAN Gaineng,LIU Xuefeng,et al.Clinical Study on Treatment of Chronic Rotator Cuff Injury with Dense Silver Needles Combined with Manipulative Release[J].Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics,2023,31(11):37-40+46.[doi:10.20085/j.cnki.issn1005-0205.231107]
点击复制

密集型银质针联合手法松解术治疗慢性肩袖损伤的临床研究()
分享到：

《中国中医骨伤科杂志》[ISSN:1005-0205/CN:42-1340/R]

卷:
第31卷
期数:
2023年11期
页码:
37-40+46
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2023-11-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical Study on Treatment of Chronic Rotator Cuff Injury with Dense Silver Needles Combined with Manipulative Release
文章编号:
1005-0205(2023)11-0037-04
作者:
施丽燕1; 袁改能1; 刘薛峰1; 蔡悦1; 徐静1△
1上海市浦东新区公利医院(上海,200135)
Author(s):
SHI Liyan1; YUAN Gaineng1; LIU Xuefeng1; CAI Yue1; XU Jing1△
1Shanghai Pudong Gongli Hospital,Shanghai 200135,China.
关键词:
慢性肩袖损伤;  手法松解;  超声检测;  银质针
Keywords:
chronic rotator cuff injury;  manual release;  ultrasound monitoring;  silver needle
分类号:
R684
DOI:
10.20085/j.cnki.issn1005-0205.231107
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:观察臂丛神经阻滞下手法松解结合银质针治疗慢性肩袖损伤的临床疗效和安全性。方法:选择28例慢性肩袖损伤患者,随机均分为观察组(14例)和对照组(14例),观察组采用超声引导下臂丛神经阻滞手法松解结合银质针治疗,对照组采用超声引导下臂丛神经阻滞手法松解治疗。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、肩关节活动度及加州大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)肩关节评分系统评定两组患者的临床疗效。记录不良反应及并发症,评价其安全性。结果:两组患者治疗前VAS评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05); 两组患者VAS评分在治疗后1周、1个月和3个月均显著低于治疗前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05); 观察组患者VAS评分在治疗后1周和1个月均显著低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者治疗前肩关节活动度的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05); 治疗后1周,观察组患者前屈、外展和后伸活动度明显大于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05); 治疗后1个月,观察组患者外展和后伸活动度均明显大于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05); 治疗后3个月,观察组患者后伸活动度明显大于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者治疗前UCLA评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05); 治疗后1周、1个月和3个月,两组患者UCLA评分均显著高于治疗前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05); 治疗后1周、1个月和3个月,观察组患者UCLA评分显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:超声引导下臂丛神经阻滞手法松解结合银质针治疗慢性肩袖损伤,能显著改善患者肩关节功能和疼痛,安全性较高,值得推广和临床应用。
Abstract:
Objective:To observe the clinical efficacy and safety of the treatment of chronic rotator cuff injury by manipulation under the brachial plexus combined with silver needles.Methods:28 cases of chronic rotator cuff injury were selected.They were randomly divided into the observation group(14 cases)and the control group(14 cases).The observation group was treated with ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block under manipulative release + silver needles,and the control group was treated with ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block under manipulative release.Visual analogue scale(VAS),shoulder joint mobility and University of California at Los Angeles(UCLA)shoulder joint scoring system were used to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the two groups of patients.Adverse reactions and complications were recorded,and their safety was evaluated.Results:There was no statistically significant difference in VAS scores between the two groups of patients before treatment(P>0.05).The VAS score of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group at 1 week,1 month and 3 months after treatment(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the comparison of shoulder joint mobility between the two groups of patients before treatment(P>0.05).After one week's treatment,the observation group showed significantly greater flexion,abduction,and extension than the control group(P<0.05).One month after treatment,the abduction and extension of the observation group were significantly greater than those of the control group(P<0.05).After 3 months' treatment,the extension of the observation group was significantly greater than that of the control group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in UCLA scores between the two groups before treatment(P>0.05).The UCLA scores of the two groups at 1 week,1 month and 3 months after treatment were significantly higher than those before treatment,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).However,the UCLA scores of the observation group at 1 week,1 month and 3 months after treatment were significantly higher than those of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:The treatment of chronic rotator cuff injury with ultrasound-guided brachial plexus manipulative release combined with silver needles can significantly improve the shoulder joint function and pain in patients with high safety,which is worthy of promotion and clinical application.

参考文献/References:

[1] 单帅,姚小强,郑先丽,等.肩峰下滑囊在肩袖损伤中的作用研究进展[J].甘肃医药,2023,42(4):304-306.
[2] ICHINOSE T,SHITARA H,TAJIKA T,et al.Factors affecting the onset and progression of rotator cuff tears in the general population[J].Sci Rep,2021,11(1):1858.
[3] 袁改能,施丽燕,万燕杰,等.手法松解术治疗慢性肩袖损伤性凝肩的临床观察[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2020,28(10):35-42.
[4] 李张生,梁恩龙,李小峰,等.银质针导热疗法治疗强直性脊柱炎的研究现状[J].广西医学,2019,41(9):1160-1163.
[5] 张建军,方勇.观察密集型银质针导热疗法治疗腰臀部 软组织损伤的临床效果[J].中外医学研究,2018,16(1):54-56.
[6] 刘仁超,周建英.银质针疗法治疗软组织疼痛概况[J].实用中医药杂志,2017,33(2):205-207.
[7] WEBER S,CHAHAL J.Management of rotator cuff injuries[J].J Am Acad Orthop Surg,2020,28(5):e193-e201.
[8] 郑建平,郑琦,刘飞.小针刀配合手法松解治疗慢性肩袖损伤97例[J].浙江中西医结合杂志,2016,26(6):567-569.
[9] 李俊,银燕,肖红,等.超声引导臂丛阻滞下肩关节松解术治疗粘连性肩关节囊炎的有效性及安全性分析[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2017,23(1):70-73.
[10] RAMIREZ J.Adhesive capsulitis:diagnosis and management[J].Am Fam Physician,2019,99(5):297-300.
[11] 王福根,江亿平,冯传有,等.银质针肌肉导热疗法临床研究[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2005,11(1):5-6.
[12] 刘薛峰,徐静.细银质针骨骼肌松解治疗膝骨关节炎疗效观察[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2020,28(8):50-53.
[13] 管晨彤,孟超,邓雪,等.粗银针配合银质针温显固定器治疗腰背肌筋膜炎的临床观察[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2019,27(4):28-31.
[14] 杨茂林,梁琳,范向凯.细银针和银质针治疗肱二头肌长头腱腱鞘炎的疗效比较[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2018,26(4):77-79.
[15] 马余鸿,叶刚,裴建.银质针治疗慢性软组织疼痛的作用机制和临床应用研究进展[J].环球中医药,2018,11(4):620-625.
[16] 王福根,富秋涛,侯京山,等.银质针治疗腰椎管外软组织损害后局部血流量变化观察[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2001,7(2):80-82.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:上海市浦东新区卫生健康委员会学科建设肩袖
损伤病特色专病项目(PWZzb2022-24)
△通信作者 E-mail:djxx02@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-11-01