[1]丛云海,夏效泳,朱治国,等.股骨颈动力交叉钉系统治疗中青年股骨颈骨折的短期疗效分析[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2023,31(09):58-62.[doi:10.20085/j.cnki.issn1005-0205.230911 ]
 CONG Yunhai,XIA Xiaoyong,ZHU Zhiguo,et al.The Analysis of the Short-Term Efficacy on Femoral Neck System on the Treatment of Pauwels Femoral Neck Fractures in Young and Middle-Aged Patients[J].Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics,2023,31(09):58-62.[doi:10.20085/j.cnki.issn1005-0205.230911 ]
点击复制

股骨颈动力交叉钉系统治疗中青年股骨颈骨折的短期疗效分析()
分享到:

《中国中医骨伤科杂志》[ISSN:1005-0205/CN:42-1340/R]

卷:
第31卷
期数:
2023年09期
页码:
58-62
栏目:
临床报道
出版日期:
2023-09-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Analysis of the Short-Term Efficacy on Femoral Neck System on the Treatment of Pauwels Femoral Neck Fractures in Young and Middle-Aged Patients
文章编号:
1005-0205(2023)09-0058-05
作者:
丛云海1夏效泳1朱治国1王立超1史宗新1△
1首都医科大学良乡教学医院(北京,102400)
Author(s):
CONG Yunhai1XIA Xiaoyong1ZHU Zhiguo1WANG Lichao1SHI Zongxin1△
1Liangxiang Teaching Hospital of Capital Medical University,Beijing 102400,China.
关键词:
中青年股骨颈骨折 内固定治疗 动力交叉钉系统
Keywords:
femoral neck fracture in young and middle-aged patients internal fixation treatment femoral neck system
分类号:
R683.42
DOI:
10.20085/j.cnki.issn1005-0205.230911
文献标志码:
B
摘要:
目的:分析股骨颈动力交叉钉系统治疗Pauwels Ⅲ型中青年股骨颈骨折的短期临床疗效。方法:2020年1月至2021年11月采用股骨颈动力交叉钉系统(Femoral Neck System,FNS)治疗Pauwels Ⅲ型中青年股骨颈骨折40例。男23例,女17例; 年龄为49~64岁,平均为56.5岁。致伤原因:交通伤22例,高处坠落伤12例,摔伤6例。术前均行髋关节X线片和CT检查,影像学检查提示均为Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折,骨折Garden分型:Ⅱ型8例,Ⅲ型8例,Ⅳ型24例。记录术中骨折复位质量,统计手术时间、术中出血量和骨折愈合时间,分析术后并发症、末次随访时股骨颈短缩程度以及髋关节Harris 评分。结果:40例患者术后均获得随访,随访时间为5~16个月,平均为13.2个月; 手术时间为30~110 min,平均为44.5 min; 术中出血量为45~200 mL,平均为80.6 mL。术中骨折复位质量Ⅰ级37例,Ⅱ级3例。38例患者术后13~24周骨折愈合,平均为17.4周,之后开始完全负重行走; 1例患者术后6个月复查时出现股骨头坏死; 1例患者术后5个月出现抗旋转钉的切出,骨折未愈合。所有患者术后无切口感染等短期并发症,其余38例患者术后无内固定物松动、股骨头塌陷等并发症。末次随访时股骨颈短缩程度1级30例,2级9例,3级1例。末次随访时采用 Harris 评分评价髋关节功能:优31例,良7例,差2例,优良率为95.0%。结论:股骨颈动力交叉钉系统内固定治疗Pauwels Ⅲ型中青年股骨颈骨折能够提供足够的支撑强度,复位固定效果确切,能够满足术后康复的需要,临床效果满意。
Abstract:
Objective:To analyze the short-term clinical efficacy of femoral neck system in the treatment of Pauwels type Ⅲ femoral neck fractures in young and middle-aged patients.Methods:From January 2020 to November 2021,the femoral neck system(FNS)was used to treat 40 young and middle-aged patients with Pauwels type Ⅲ femoral neck fractures.There were 23 males and 17 females.The age ranked from 49 to 64 years old with 56.5 years old on average.The causes of injury were traffic accidents in 22 cases,falling from height in 12 cases,and falling in 6 cases.Preoperative hip X-ray and CT examination showed Pauwels type Ⅲ femoral neck fractures in all patients.According to Garden classification,8 cases were rated as type Ⅱ,8 cases as type Ⅲ,and 24 cases as type Ⅳ.The quality of intraoperative fracture reduction,the operation time,intraoperative blood loss,and fracture healing time were recorded.The postoperative complications,femoral neck shortening and hip Harris score at the last follow-up were analyzed.Results:All patients were followed up for 516 months,with 13.2 months on average.The operation time was 30110 min,with 44.5 min on average.The intraoperative blood loss was 45200 mL,with 80.6 mL on average.The quality of fracture reduction was gradeⅠin 37 cases and grade Ⅱ in 3 cases.The fractures of 38 patients healed at 1324 weeks,with 17.4 weeks on average after operation,and they began to walk with full weight-bearing.One patient had osteonecrosis of the femoral head at 6 months after operation.The anti-rotation nail was cut out in 1 patient at 5 months after operation,and the fracture did not heal.All patients had no short-term complications such as incision infection after operation,and the other 38 patients had no complications such as internal fixation loosening and femoral head collapse after operation.At last follow-up,the degree of femoral neck shortening was grade 1 in 30 cases,grade 2 in 9 cases,and grade 3 in 1 case.At the last follow-up,according to Harris score,31 cases were excellent,7 cases were good,and 2 cases were poor,with an excellent and good rate of 95.0%.Conclusion:Femoral neck system internal fixation on the treatment of Pauwels type Ⅲ femoral neck fractures in young and middle-aged patients can provide sufficient support strength,accurate reduction and fixation,and meet the needs of postoperative rehabilitation and can achieve a satisfactory clinical efficacy.

参考文献/References:

[1] FREITAS A,TORRES G M,SOUZA A C,et al.Analysis on the mechanical resistance of fixation of femoral neck fractures in synthetic bone,using the dynamic hip system and an anti-rotation screw[J].Rev Bras Ortop,2014,49(6):586-592.
[2] 柏秋实,张保中,常晓.PauwelsⅢ型股骨颈骨折内固定治疗的研究进展[J].中华骨与关节外科杂志,2021,14(5):437-441.
[3] GREGORY J J,KOSTAKOPOULOU K,COOL D J.One year outcome for elderly patients with displaced intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck managed non operatively[J].Injury,2010,41(12):1273-1276.
[4] 中华医学会骨科学分会创伤骨科学组,中国医师协会骨科医师分会创伤专家工作委员会.成人股骨颈骨折诊治指南[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2018,20(11):921-928.
[5] 王照东,官建中,吴敏,等.两种空心螺钉构型治疗青壮年股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2021,35(3):1-5.
[6] SAMSAMI S,SABERI S,SADIGHI S,et al.Comparison of three fixation methods for femoral neck fracture in young adults:experimental and numerical investigations[J].J Med Biol Eng,2015,35(5):566-579.
[7] 张晟,胡岩君,余斌.不同内固定方式固定 Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈 骨折模型的有限元分析[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2017,25(2):163-169.
[8] 窦连大,王辉,张春明,等.DHS 加防旋螺钉治疗Pauwels Ⅲ 型 股骨颈骨折[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2020,28(18):1722-1724.
[9] 汤长华,王黎明,姚庆强,等.双头空心钉组合单头空心钉内固定治疗头下型股骨颈骨折[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2017,32(3):312-313.
[10] 位锋,周业金,姚涛,等.空心钉联合支撑钢板治疗中青年Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折[J].中国组织工程研究,2021,25(18):2869-2874.
[11] STOCKTON D J,DUA K,O'BRIEN P J,et al.Failure patterns of femoral neck fracture fixation in young patients[J].Orthopedics,2019,42(4):e376-e380.
[12] SLOBOGEAN G P,SPRAGUE S A,SCOTT T,et al.Complications following young femoral neck fractures[J].Injury,2015,46(3):484-491.
[13] SCHOPPER C,ZDERIC I,MENZE J,et al.Higher stability and more predictive fixation with the femoral neck system versus Hansson Pins in femoral neck fractures Pauwels Ⅱ[J].J Orthop Translat,2020,24:88-95.
[14] STOFFEL K,ZDERIC I,GRAS F,et al.Biomechanical evaluation of the femoral neck system in unstable Pauwels Ⅲ femoral neck fractures:a comparison with the dynamic hip screw and cannulated acrews[J].J Orthop Trauma,2017,31(3):131-137.
[15] 范智荣,苏海涛,周霖,等.新型股骨颈内固定系统治疗不稳定性股骨颈骨折的有限元分析[J].中国组织工程研究,2021,25(15):2321-2328.
[16] CHANG C H,TSAI S W,WU P K,et al.Suboptimal outcomes after internal fixation for displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures in 50-to 60-year-old patients[J].Hip International,2019,30(4):474-480.
[17] 熊巍,易敏,龙成,等.股骨颈动力交叉钉系统与倒三角形空心螺钉固定治疗成人股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2021,23(9):748-753.
[18] 许翔宇,周方,田耘,等.股骨颈动力交叉钉系统与动力髋螺钉固定治疗股骨颈骨折的早期疗效比较[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2021,23(9):754-760.
[19] 杨家赵,周雪锋,朱万博,等.股骨颈动力交叉钉系统与空心螺钉固定治疗青壮年股骨颈骨折的近期疗效比较[J].中华创伤杂志,2022,38(3):761-768.
[20] 常廷杰,葛宇峰,高峰,等.股骨颈动力交叉钉系统与空心螺钉固定治疗中青年股骨颈骨折的近期疗效比较[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2022,24(6):533-537.
[21] 贺冬冬,曾令员,高远鹏,等.股骨颈动力交叉钉系统内固定植入物安放位置的力学差异分析与临床应用[J].中华实验外科杂志,2022,39(1):162-165.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
通信作者 E-mail:shizongxin_or@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-09-01