[1]姚灿,杨光永,娄菊红,等.双钢板与单钢板内固定治疗肱骨近端骨折的临床研究[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2023,31(06):24-28+35.[doi:10.20085/j.cnki.issn1005-0205.230604]
　YAO Can,YANG Guangyong,LOU Juhong,et al.Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Double-Plate and Single-Plate Internal Fixationon Treatment of Fractures of the Proximal Humerus[J].Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics,2023,31(06):24-28+35.[doi:10.20085/j.cnki.issn1005-0205.230604]
点击复制

双钢板与单钢板内固定治疗肱骨近端骨折的临床研究()
分享到：

《中国中医骨伤科杂志》[ISSN:1005-0205/CN:42-1340/R]

卷:
第31卷
期数:
2023年06期
页码:
24-28+35
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2023-06-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Double-Plate and Single-Plate Internal Fixationon Treatment of Fractures of the Proximal Humerus
文章编号:
1005-0205(2023)06-0024-05
作者:
姚灿1; 杨光永1; 娄菊红1; 王斌1△
1浙江省台州医院(浙江 台州,317000)
Author(s):
YAO Can1; YANG Guangyong1; LOU Juhong1; WANG Bin1△
1Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province,Taizhou 317000,Zhejiang China.
关键词:
锁定接骨板;  内固定;  肱骨近端;  肩关节;  内侧柱支撑重建
Keywords:
locking bone plate;  internal fixation;  proximal humerus;  articulatio humeri;  medial column support reconstruction
分类号:
R683.41
DOI:
10.20085/j.cnki.issn1005-0205.230604
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:比较双钢板与单钢板内固定术式在肱骨近端Neer Ⅲ、Ⅳ型骨折中的应用效果及安全性。方法:选取2019年10月至2021年10月收治的80例肱骨近端Neer Ⅲ及Ⅳ型骨折患者,按照内固定方式将其分为双钢板组与单钢板组,每组各40例。双钢板组采用肱骨近端外侧锁定接骨板与内侧微型锁定钢板内固定,单钢板组采用肱骨近端外侧锁定接骨板内固定。比较两组临床相关指标,术后Neer评分、视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、肩关节活动度以及并发症情况。结果:双钢板组手术时间、术中出血量明显大于单钢板组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),术后主动活动时间与骨折愈合时间明显小于单钢板组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05); 双钢板组治疗后Neer优良率、肩关节活动度均明显高于单钢板组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),VAS评分及并发症发生率明显低于单钢板组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:内外侧组合双钢板内固定术式在肱骨近端Neer Ⅲ、Ⅳ型骨折中的应用效果较单钢板更佳,更利于患者术后患肢关节功能恢复,治疗效果安全可靠。
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the application efficacy and safety of double-plate and single-plate internal fixation in the proximal humeral Neer Ⅲ and Ⅳ fractures.Methods:A total of 80 patients with Neer Ⅲ and Ⅳ fractures of the proximal humerus admitted to our hospital from October 2019 to October 2021 were selected and divided into double-plate group and single-plate group according to the internal fixation method with 40 cases in each group.Proximal humeral locking plate and medial micro locking plate were used for internal fixation in the double plate group,while the proximal lateral locking plate was used for internal fixation in the single plate group.The clinical related indexes,neer score,visual analogue scale(VAS),shoulder range of motion and complications were compared between the two groups.Results:The operation time and intraoperative blood loss in the double-plate group were significantly greater than those in the single-plate group(P<0.05),and the postoperative active activity time and fracture healing time were significantly shorter than those in the single-plate group(P<0.05).Neer excellent and good rate,shoulder joint range of motion of double plate-group were significantly higher than those of single plate-group after treatment(P<0.05),VAS score and incidence of complications were significantly lower than those of single plate group after treatment(P<0.05).Conclusion:The internal and lateral combined double-plate internal fixation method is more effective than single-plate in the proximal humeral Neer Ⅲ and Ⅳ fractures.It is more conducive to the recovery of postoperative joint function of the affected limb and the treatment efficacy is safe and reliable.

参考文献/References:

[1] 孟险峰,曹鑫,崔华安,等.预复位技术治疗老年肱骨近端复杂骨折的临床疗效[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2019,27(4):375-377.
[2] 赵洪斌,宋洋,黄明光,等.锁定钢板治疗不同Neer分型肱骨近端骨折的疗效及生物力学恢复情况的评价[J].中国全科医学,2019,22(32):3985-3989.
[3] 刘冰川,杨钟玮,周方,等.肱骨近端骨折微创锁定钢板改良内固定的疗效分析[J].北京大学学报(医学版),2019,51(2):277-282.
[4] PANAGOPOULOS A,KYRIAKOPOULOS G,ANASTOPOULOS G,et al.Design of improved intertrochanteric fracture treatment(drift)study:protocol for biomechanical testing and finite element analysis of stable and unstable intertrochanteric fractures treated with intramedullary nailing or dynamic compression screw[J].JMIR Research Protocols,2019,8(7):e12845.
[5] SAMIR M,MATTHEW C,JENNIFER S,et al.Calcar screw position in proximal humerus fracture fixation:don't miss high![J].Injury,2018,49(3):624-629.
[6] 葛鸿庆,郑沐欣,管华.锁定钢板联合异体腓骨支撑治疗老年内翻型肱骨近端骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2019,21(5):440-442.
[7] 宫伟,王建嗣,李炳钻,等.儿童胫骨远端干骺交界区骨折两种微创手术的疗效比较[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2022,30(11):19-22.
[8] 孙兵,车晓明.视觉模拟评分法(VAS)[J].中华神经外科杂志,2012,28(6):645.
[9] 云大科,符丽娜,贾丙申,等.重建内侧柱支撑对肱骨近端骨折术后肩关节功能的影响分析[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2022,30(3):57-61.
[10] 侯德胜,鲁成,薛天乐,等.锁定钢板治疗肱骨近端骨折的疗效[J].中华全科医学,2018,16(7):1094-1096.
[11] CHEN C Y,CHANG H W,HSIEH S L,et al.Preliminary clinical and radiographic outcomes of proximal humeral fractures:comparison of ALPS and PHILOS plating in Asian patients in Taiwan[J].J ORTHOP SURG RES,2020,15(1):715-719.
[12] 蓝国华,胡柏松,陈金洪.肱骨近端锁定钢板结合微型钢板固定治疗肱骨外科颈Neer四型骨折临床观察[J].浙江中西医结合杂志,2020,30(5):420-421.
[13] 花克涵,陈辰,李庭,等.肱骨髁间骨折切开复位内固定术后肘关节僵硬的危险因素分析[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2019,21(11):966-972.
[14] 周君琳.复杂肱骨近端骨折内固定治疗[J].中华肩肘外科电子杂志,2019,7(1):93-93.
[15] 曾德华.内侧柱支撑重建联合常规内固定对老年肱骨近端骨折患者愈合及肢体功能的影响[J].医药前沿,2019,9(21):31-32.
[16] LI L,WU H X,JIANG P C,et al.Comparison of four different internal fixation methods in the treatment of distal clavicle fractures[J].Exp Ther Med,2020,19(1):451-458.
[17] 徐磊,石兴雷,韩玉虎,等.单与双钢板内固定治疗复杂胫骨平台骨折比较[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2020,28(12):1081-1084.
[18] 王锟,郑世军,张大伟,等.内侧柱支撑重建结合锁定钢板内固定对肱骨近端骨折患者预后的影响[J].医学新知杂志,2019,29(1):43-44.
[19] ZIEGLER P,MAIERS,STÖCKLE U,et al.The treatment of proximal humerus fracture using internal fixation with fixed-angle plates[J].Dtsch Arztebl Int,2019,116(45):757-763.
[20] 张睿,罗鹏,胡炜,等.新型股骨近端内侧支撑钢板治疗股骨反转子间骨折的生物力学研究[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2017,31(2):165-170.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:浙江省基础研究公益计划项目(GF19H060021)
△通信作者 E-mail:wangbin@enzemed.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-06-10