[1]吴伟 刘晓峰.丝攻试验联合纽扣钢板诊治踝关节骨折下胫腓联合不稳24例[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2021,29(05):77-80.
 WU Wei LIU Xiaofeng.Clinical Report of 24 Cases for the Diagnosis and Treatment of theTap Test Combined with Endobutton Plate Cable System in theAnkle Fracture Merging Instability of Tibiofibular Syndesmosis[J].Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics,2021,29(05):77-80.
点击复制

丝攻试验联合纽扣钢板诊治踝关节骨折下胫腓联合不稳24例()
分享到:

《中国中医骨伤科杂志》[ISSN:1005-0205/CN:42-1340/R]

卷:
第29卷
期数:
2021年05期
页码:
77-80
栏目:
临床报道
出版日期:
2021-05-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical Report of 24 Cases for the Diagnosis and Treatment of theTap Test Combined with Endobutton Plate Cable System in theAnkle Fracture Merging Instability of Tibiofibular Syndesmosis
文章编号:
1005-0205(2021)05-0077-04
作者:
吴伟1 刘晓峰1
1江苏无锡市中医医院创伤骨科(江苏 无锡,214000)
Author(s):
WU Wei1 LIU Xiaofeng1
1Department of Traumatic Orthopedics,Wuxi Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Wuxi 214000,Jiangsu China.
关键词:
踝关节 骨折 下胫腓 丝攻试验 纽扣钢板 固定
Keywords:
ankle joint fracture tibiofibular tap test endobutton fixation
分类号:
R687.32
文献标志码:
B
摘要:
目的:探讨丝攻试验联合纽扣钢板在诊断和治疗踝关节骨折合并下胫腓联合不稳中的临床疗效。方法:本组24例,男14例,女10例; 年龄24~74岁,平均46.8岁。其中Lauge-Hansen 分型旋后-外旋Ⅳ度6例; 旋前-外旋型Ⅳ度8例; 旋前-外展型Ⅱ度4例,Ⅲ度6例。在行踝关节骨折切开复位内固定术时,24例均行丝攻试验证实下胫腓联合不稳定,采用纽扣钢板线缆系统行下胫腓联合弹性固定。结果:术后随访时间 7~24个月,平均15.5个月。无伤口感染不愈、钢板松动断裂下沉及下胫腓联合复位丢失情况。术后6个月按照AOFAS踝-后足评分标准:优21例,良2例,可1例。结论:丝攻试验是一个简单、安全、客观、评判标准一致、诊断特异性敏感性均较高的下胫腓联合不稳定术中诊断方法。纽扣钢板线缆系统具有能自发性复位,允许下胫腓微动,不良复位率低和良好的生物力学优势,负重功能锻炼更早等优点。两者结合在诊断和治疗踝关节骨折合并下胫腓联合不稳中,有操作方法简单,流程顺畅无反复,安全且诊断标准一致不易漏诊,固定牢固稳妥并且不需特意取出,疗效确切,并发症、后遗症较少的优势,值得推广应用。
Abstract:
To analyze the clinical efficacy of the diagnosis and treatment of the tap test combined with endobutton plate cable system in the ankle fracture merging instability of tibiofibular syndesmosis.Methods:There were 14 males and 10 females with an average age of 46.8 years old(24 to 74 years old).There were 6 cases of supination external rotation Ⅳ degree,8 cases of pronation external rotation Ⅳ degree,4 cases of pronation abduction Ⅱ degree and 6 cases of degree Ⅲ according to Lauge-Hanson typing.During the surgical operation of ankle fractures,all 24 cases were tested by the tap test to verify the instability of tibiofibular syndesmosis.The Endobutton plate cable system was used for the elastic fixation of the tibiofibular syndesmosis.Results:All patients were followed up for 7 to 24 months(with 15.5 months on average).There was no wound infection,plate loosening,fracture,subsidence,and reduction loss of tibiofibular syndesmosis.All the patients were assessed by American orthopedic foot and ankle society(AOFAS)ankle and hind-foot score.21 cases were excellent after operation 6 months,2 cases were good and 1 case was fair.Conclusion:The tap test is a simple,safe,objective,consistent evaluation standard and high sensitivity diagnostic methods of tibiofibular syndesmosis instability.The endobutton plate cable system has the advantages of spontaneous reduction,allowing the lower tibiofibular micro motion,low rate of bad reduction,good biomechanical advantages,and earlier weight-bearing exercise.The combination of the two methods in the diagnosis and treatment of ankle fracture combined with tibiofibular instability reveals advantages of simple operation method,smooth process,no repetition,safety,consistent diagnostic criteria,not easy to miss diagnosis,reliable and stable fixation and no need to take it out specially,exact curative effect and less complications,which is worthy of wide application.

参考文献/References:

[1] DATTANI R,PATNAIK S,KANTAK A,et al.Injuries to the tibiofibular syndesmosis[J].J Bone Joint Surg(Br),2008,90(4):405-410.
[2] MAGAN A,GOLANO P,MAFFULLI N,et al.Evaluation and management of injuries of the tibiofibular syndesmosis[J].Br Med Bull,2014,111(1):101-115.
[3] KITAOKA H B,ALEXANDER I J,ADELAAR R S,et al.Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot,midfoot,hallux,and lesser toes[J].Foot & Ankle International,2014,15(7):349-353.
[4] HAN S H,LEE J W,KIM S,et al.Chronic tibiofibular syndesmosis injury:the diagnostic efficiency of magnetic resonance imaging and comparative analysis of operative treatment[J].Foot Ankle Int,2007,28(3):336-342.
[5] RAJAGOPALAN S, UPADHYAY V, TAYLOR H P,et al.New intra-operative technique for testing the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis[J].Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England,2010,92(3):258.
[6] SCHOTTEL P C,FABRICANT P D,BERKES M D,et al.Manual stress ankle radiography has poor ability to predict deep deltoid ligament integrity in a supination external rotation fracture cohort[J].The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery,2014,54(4),531-536.
[7] 黄建华,王建东,林健,等.丝攻试验在踝关节手术中判断下 胫腓联合稳定性的应用[ J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2013,15(12):1029-1032.
[8] MILLER M A,MCDONALD T C,GRAVES M L,et al.Stability of the syndesmosis after posterior malleolar fracture fixation[J].Foot & Ankle International,2018,39(1):99-104.
[9] SINISAARI I P,LUTHJE P M,MIKKONEN R H.Ruptured tibio-fibular syndesmosis:Comparison study of metallic to bioabsorbable fixation[J].Foot Ankle Int,2002,23(8):744-748.
[10] LAFLAMME M,BELZILE EL,BéDARD L,et al.A prospective randomized multicenter trial comparing clinical outcomes of patients treated surgically with a static or dynamic implant for acute ankle syndesmosis rupture[J].J Orthop Trauma,2015,29(5):216-223.
[11] SWITAJ P J,MENDOZA M,KADAKIA A R.Acute and chronic injuries to the syndesmosis[J].Clin Sports Med,2015,34(4):643-677.
[12] OKAZAKI M,KANEKO M, I SHIDA Y,et al.Gender difference in distance of tibiofibular syndesmosis tonjoint dynamics of lower extremities during squat[J].J Physiol Sci Mar,2015,65(2):165-170.
[13] WOLF B R,AMENDOLA A.Sundesmosis injuries in the athletes:when and how to operate[J].Curr Opin Ortho,2002,13:151-154.
[14] PIROZZI K M,CREECH C L,MEYR A J.Assessment of anatomic risk during syndesmotic stabilization with the suture button technique[J].J Foot Ankle Surg,2015,54(5):917-919.
[15] 秦大平,张晓刚,宋敏,等.弹性内固定材料在下胫腓联合损伤中的应用研究[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2015,23(5):68-71.
[16] SEYHAN M,DONMEZ F,MAHIROGULLARI M.Comparison of screw fixation with elastic fixation methods in the treatment of syndesmosis injuries in ankle fractures[J].Injury,2015,46(2):S19-S23.
[17] ANDERSEN M R,FRIHAGEN F,MADSEN J E,et al.High complication rate after syndesmotic screw removal[J].Injury,2015,46(11):2283-2287.

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-05-15