[1]唐俊△ 李红波.椎体后凸成形术对不同部位单节段骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的作用效果分析[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2021,29(01):34-38.
 TANG Jun LI Hongbo.Effect of PKP on Single-Segmental Osteoporotic VertebralCompression Fractures in Different Sites[J].Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics,2021,29(01):34-38.
点击复制

椎体后凸成形术对不同部位单节段骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的作用效果分析()
分享到:

《中国中医骨伤科杂志》[ISSN:1005-0205/CN:42-1340/R]

卷:
第29卷
期数:
2021年01期
页码:
34-38
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2021-01-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of PKP on Single-Segmental Osteoporotic VertebralCompression Fractures in Different Sites
文章编号:
1005-0205(2021)01-0034-05
作者:
唐俊1△ 李红波1
Author(s):
TANG Jun1△ LI Hongbo1
1Department of Spinal Surgery,The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University(Nanning Second Peoples’ Hospital),Nanning 530031,China.
关键词:
经皮穿刺椎体后凸成形术 单节段骨质疏松 椎体压缩性骨折 骨水泥注入
Keywords:
percutaneous kyphoplasty single-segment osteoporosis vertebral compression fractures bone cement injection
分类号:
R683.2
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:分析经皮穿刺椎体后凸成形术(PKP)对不同部位单节段骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的作用效果,为临床手术的实施提供参考。方法:回顾性分析2015年6月至2018年6月行PKP手术的单节段骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者78例,根据骨折部位不同分为A组(上中胸段骨折,15例),B组(胸腰段骨折,42例),C组(下腰段骨折,21例)。比较三组患者的手术情况(手术时间、术中透视次数和骨水泥注入量)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)、影像学指标(Cobb角和伤椎前缘高度比值)及骨水泥渗漏情况。结果:与A组相比,B组和C组手术时间及术中透视次数显著降低; B组骨水泥注入量显著高于A组,C组骨水泥注入量则显著高于A和B两组(P<0.05)。三组患者在术后1 d和术后1年的ODI较术前均显著降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而Cobb角和伤椎前缘高度比值较术前则显著升高(P<0.05)。A组骨水泥渗漏2例(13.33%),B组3例(7.14%),C组1例(4.76%)。结论:PKP对不同部位的单节段骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的治疗在临床上均具有较好的疗效。
Abstract:
To analyze the effect of percutaneous kyphoplasty(PKP)on single-segment osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in different sites,and to provide reference for the implementation of clinical surgery.Methods:78 patients with single-segment osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures who underwent PKP surgery from June 2015 to June 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.According to the fracture site,they were divided into group A(15 cases of upper and middle thoracic fractures),group B(42 cases of thoracolumbar fractures),and group C(21 cases of lower lumbar fractures).The surgical status(operation time,intraoperative fluoroscopy and bone cement injection),Oswestry dysfunction index(ODI),imaging index(Cobb angle and the height ratio of injury cone leading edge)and the situation of bone cement leakage were compared between three groups.Results:Compared to group A,the operation time and intraoperative fluoroscopy times of group B and group C were significantly decreased(P<0.05).The amount of bone cement injection in group B was significantly higher than that in group A,and the amount of bone cement injection in group C was significantly higher than that in group A and B(P<0.05).Compared to before surgery,the ODI among three groups were significantly reduced at 1 d and 1 year after operation(P<0.05),while the Cobb angle and the ratio of the eight in front of the injury cone was significantly increased(P<0.05).There were 2 cases(13.33%)of bone cement leakage in group A,3 cases(7.14%)in group B,and 1 case(4.76%)in group C.Conclusion:PKP has a good clinical effect on the treatment of single-segment osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in different parts.

参考文献/References:

[1] 白璧辉,谢兴文,李鼎鹏,等.我国近5年来骨质疏松症流行病学研究现状[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,2018,24(2):253-258.
[2] 杨惠林,刘昊,殷国勇,等.我国经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体骨折现状与创新[J].中华骨质疏松和骨矿盐疾病杂志,2017,10(1):12-19.
[3] 朱燕.骨质疏松性椎体骨折患者进行脊柱微创手术的疗效探究[J].当代医药论丛,2017,15(2):62-63.
[4] ZHOU T,LIN H,WANG H,et al.Comparative study on the biomechanics between improved PVP and traditional PKP in the treatment of vertebral peripheral wall damage-type OVCF[J].Exp Ther Med,2017,14(1):575-580.
[5] 何少斌,刘平.OVCF经皮椎体后凸成形术后骨水泥渗漏的相关因素分析[J].西南国防医药,2014,24(2):157-159.
[6] 钟远鸣,张翼升,李智斐,等.胸腰椎骨质疏松骨折时间与PVP术后临床疗效相关性的研究[J].重庆医学,2018,47(32):56-60.
[7] YANG B H,LI G S,ZHANG Y F,et al.Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus percutaneous kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compressive fracture:a retrospective cohort study[J].J Evid Based Med,2015,15(4):377-380.
[8] 陈安刚,曾本强,常瑞,等.两种术式治疗老年骨质疏松性胸腰段脊柱爆裂性骨折的疗效比较[J].中国骨与关节杂志,2018,7(6):28-33.
[9] SONG L J,WNAG L L,NING L,et al.A modification and validation of quantitative morphometry classification system for osteoporotic vertebral compressive fractures in mainland Chinese[J].Osteoporosis Int,2018,29(11):2495-2504..
[10] 高志祥,李淳,李磊,等.PVP、PKP、骨填充网袋治疗胸腰段骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的疗效分析[J].实用骨科杂志,2017,23(8):680-683.
[11] 姬亚锋.单侧入路椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性中段胸椎骨折50例分析[J].浙江创伤外科,2018,23(6):151-152.
[12] LEI F,CHUN F,JIE C,et al.The risk factors of vertebral refracture after kyphoplasty in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures:a study protocol for a prospective cohort study[J].BMC Musculoskelet Disord,2018,19(1):195-202.
[13] 段广超.PKP与PVP在骨质疏松致腰椎骨折治疗中应用比较[J].临床研究,2017,25(12):13-14.
[14] HUANG Z,WAN S,NING L,et al.Is unilateral kyphoplasty as effective and safe as bilateral kyphoplasties for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures? a meta-analysis[J].Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research,2014,472(9):2833-2842.
[15] LIU M X,XIA L,ZHONG J,et al.Is it necessary to approach the compressed vertebra bilaterally during the process of PKP?[J].J Spinal Cord Med,2018,15(2):62-63.
[16] 吴智辉,徐长科,朱鑫.单侧与双侧椎弓根入路PKP治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的比较[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2018,33(3):281-283.
[17] JING Z,SUN Q,DONG J,et al.Is it beneficial to reuse the balloon in percutaneous kyphoplasty for the treatment of non-neoplastic vertebral compression fractures?[J].Med Sci Monit,2017,13(23):5907-5915.
[18] 皮海菊,肖淼生,尚晖.单侧椎弓根旁入路经皮椎体成形术治疗下胸椎压缩性骨折可行性、安全性和有效性分析[J].中国临床研究,2017,30(3):323-326.
[19] 龚毅,王小平,丁跃华,等.单侧与双侧椎弓根穿刺行PKP治疗椎体骨质疏松性 压缩骨折的疗效比较[J].宁夏医科大学学报,2018,40(4):476-478.
[20] 宋建东,陈子健,李停,等.单、双侧经椎弓根途径PKP术治疗骨质疏松性胸椎压缩性骨折的临床疗效对比[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2017,25(11):37-39.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
1广西医科大学第三附属医院(南宁市第二人民医院)脊柱外科(南宁,530031)
通信作者 E-mail:ttjun12@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-01-15