[1]刘建雄 薛为民△ 孙润芳.根据椎体夹角选择术式治疗退行性脊柱侧凸的短期观察[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2020,28(12):40-43.
　LIU Jianxiong XUE Weimin SUN Runfang.Short-term Observation of Surgical Option Based onCobb Angle for Degenerative Scoliosis[J].Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics,2020,28(12):40-43.
点击复制

根据椎体夹角选择术式治疗退行性脊柱侧凸的短期观察()
分享到：

《中国中医骨伤科杂志》[ISSN:1005-0205/CN:42-1340/R]

卷:
第28卷
期数:
2020年12期
页码:
40-43
栏目:
临床论著
出版日期:
2020-12-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Short-term Observation of Surgical Option Based onCobb Angle for Degenerative Scoliosis
文章编号:
1005-0205(2020)12-0040-04
作者:
刘建雄1 薛为民1△ 孙润芳1
1山西省中医院(太原,030012)△通信作者 E-mail:89500521@qq.com
Author(s):
LIU Jianxiong1 XUE Weimin1△ SUN Runfang1
1Department of Spine Surgery, Shanxi Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Taiyuan 030012, China.
关键词:
退变性疾病;  脊柱侧凸;  短期疗效;  术后并发症
Keywords:
degenerative diseases;  scoliosis;  short-term efficacy;  postoperative complications
分类号:
R681.5
文献标志码:
B
摘要:
目的:比较长节段与短节段融合内固定治疗退行性脊柱侧凸的短期疗效。方法:观察2017年7月1日至2019年7月31日手术融合固定的60例退行性脊柱侧凸患者,根据患者术前椎体夹角(Cobb角)分组,Cobb角≥25°为A组,Cobb角<25°为B组。其中A组24例,B组36例,A组行长节段融合内固定,B组行短节段融合内固定,术后1周及1年采用VAS评分、ODI评分、Cobb角对患者临床疗效进行评价。结果:B组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量均明显少于A组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05); 两组患者术后的VAS评分、ODI评分、Cobb角较术前均有明显改善,B组Cobb角术后改善较A组差,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:两种手术方法均能取得满意的短期疗效,长节段融合内固定术侧凸的矫正优于短节段融合内固定术,长期疗效有待进一步随访观察。
Abstract:
To compare the short-term clinical efficacy of long and short-segment fusion with internal fixation for degenerative scoliosis(DS). Methods:60 patients with DS underwent long and short-segment fusion with internal fixation from July 1, 2017 to July 31, 2019. The patients were divided into two groups according to the preoperative Cobb angle. The Cobb angle was greater than 25° named group A(24 cases), and the Cobb angle was less than 25° named group B(36 cases). Group A underwent long-segment fusion and internal fixation, and group B underwent short-segment fusion and internal fixation. VAS, ODI score and Cobb angle were documented to evaluate the clinical efficacy.Results:The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative drainage volume of group B were significantly less than those of group A. The postoperative VAS, ODI score and Cobb angle of the two groups were significantly improved as compared with that of preoperative document. The postoperative improvement of Cobb angle in group B was lower as compared with that of group A. Conclusion:Both surgical options can achieve satisfactory short-term clinical efficacy. Long-segment fusion is better than short-segment fusion with internal fixation in correction of scoliosis. The long-term efficacy still needs further observation.

参考文献/References:

[1] 赵龙晓,郭俊杰,李伟,等.退行性腰椎侧凸在腰腿痛人群中的发病特点[J].青岛大学医学院学报,2015,51(6):653-655.
[2] AILON T,SMITH J S,SHAFFREY C I,et al.Degenerative,spine deformity[J].Neurosurgery,2015,77(14):S75-S91.
[3] 云靖,杨勇.保守治疗和手术治疗退行性腰椎侧凸的疗效比较[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2017,17(45):5-6.
[4] 吴建红,徐卫星,赖松军,等.退行性腰椎侧凸合并椎管狭窄症的手术治疗[J].中国骨伤,2012,28(6):459-462.
[5] 胥少汀,葛宝丰,徐印坎.实用骨科学[M].3版.北京:人民军医出版社,2005:1732-1733.
[6] FAIRBANK J C,COUPER J,DAVIES J B,et al.The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire[J].Physiotherapy,1980,66(8):271-273.
[7] CARLSSON A M.Assessment of Chronic pain.Ⅰ.Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale[J].Pain,1983,16(1):87-101.
[8] AEBI M.The adult scoliosis[J].Eur Spine,2005,14(10):925-948.
[9] WANG N,WANG D,WANG F,et al.Evaluation of degenerative lumbar scoliosis after short segment decompression and fusion[J].Medicine(Baltimore),2015,94(47):1824.
[10] 姜传杰,杨永军,谭远超,等.成人退变性脊柱侧凸的研究进展[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2014,22(5):75-78.
[11] LIU H,ISHIHARA H,KANAMORI M,et al.Characteristics of nerve root compression caused by degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with scoliosis[J].Spine,2003,3(6):524-529.
[12] FAIDINI C,DIMARTINO A,BORGHI R,et al.Long vs short fusions for adult lumbar degenerative scoliosis:does balance matters?[J].Eur Spine,2015,24(7):887-892.
[13] 孙武,朱立国,高景华,等.根据症状特点选择术式治疗退行性脊柱侧凸的3～7年随访[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2019,27(2):9-12.
[14] 张希诺,孙祥耀,海涌.成人退行性脊柱侧凸长节段融合术后内科并发症 危险因素分析[J].中国骨与关节杂志,2018,7(10):725-730.
[15] SILVA F E,LENKE L G.Adult degenerative scoliosis:evaluation and management [J].Neurosurg Focu,2010,28(3):E1.
[16] CHO K J,SUK S I,PARK S R,et al.Arthrodesis to L5 versus S1 in long instrumentation and fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis[J]Eur Spine J,2009,18(4):531-537.
[17] HORTON W C,HOLT R T,MULDOWNY D S.Controversy fusion of L5S1 in adult scoliosis[J].Spine,1996,21(21):2520-2522.
[18] 张昊聪,孙鹏飞,张子方,等.退行性脊柱侧凸畸形长节段固定术后L5S1融合稳定性的临床研究[J].中华骨科杂志,2017,10(20):1263-1268.
[19] SCHWAB F,DUBEY A,GAMEZ L,et al.Adult scoliosis:prevalence,SF36,and nutritional parameter sinan elderly volunteer population[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2005,30(9):1082-1085.
[20] ROCHEFORT G Y.The osteocyte as atherapeutic target in the treatment of osteoporosis[J].Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis,2014,6(3):79-91.
[21] 楼肃亮,赵志芳,李小娟.退行性脊柱侧凸和骨质疏松的关系探讨[J].解放军医药杂志,2014,10(10):27-29.
[22] EPSTEIN J A,EPSTEIN B S,JONES M D.Symptomatic lumbar scoliosis with degenerative changes in the elderly[J].Spine,1979,4(6):542-547.
[23] 卢海霖,邑晓东,王宇.根据退行性脊柱侧凸患者症状选择不同手术方案的临床研究[J].现代生物医学进展,2016,10(16):5851-5857.

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-12-15