[1]袁改能 施丽燕 万燕杰 徐静△.手法松解术治疗慢性肩袖损伤的临床观察[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2020,28(10):35-38.
　YUAN Gaineng SHI Liyan WAN Yanjie XU Jing.Clinical Observation of Closed Manipulative Release in the Treatment of Chronic Rotator Cuff Injury[J].Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics,2020,28(10):35-38.
点击复制

手法松解术治疗慢性肩袖损伤的临床观察()
分享到：

《中国中医骨伤科杂志》[ISSN:1005-0205/CN:42-1340/R]

卷:
第28卷
期数:
2020年10期
页码:
35-38
栏目:
临床论著
出版日期:
2020-10-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical Observation of Closed Manipulative Release in the Treatment of Chronic Rotator Cuff Injury
文章编号:
1005-0205(2020)10-0035-04
作者:
袁改能1 施丽燕1 万燕杰1 徐静1△
Author(s):
YUAN Gaineng1 SHI Liyan1 WAN Yanjie1 XU Jing1△
1Department of Pain Management,Shanghai Pudong Gongli Hospital,Shanghai 200135,China.
关键词:
手法松解;  慢性肩袖损伤;  疗效;  安全性
Keywords:
closed manipulative release;  chronic rotator cuff injury;  clinical efficacy;  safety
分类号:
R686
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:探讨手法松解术治疗慢性肩袖损伤的临床疗效及安全性。方法:选取2018年6月至2019年6月收治的慢性肩袖损伤患者48例,随机分为观察组(n=24)与对照组(n=24),观察组采用超声引导臂丛阻滞麻醉下手法松解术治疗,对照组行超声引导下肩峰下滑囊注射术治疗。分别采用疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、肩关节活动度及美国加州大学肩关节评分(UCLA)评定两组患者的临床疗效。记录不良反应及并发症,评价其安全性。结果:观察组全部完成随访,对照组有2例未完成随访,最终观察组24例(n=24),对照组22例(n=22)。两组患者治疗后肩关节各项指标都有所好转。观察组治疗后肩关节活动度、UCLA均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组治疗后1周VAS评分劣于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),治疗后1个月VAS评分与对照组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),治疗后3个月VAS评分优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后均未见并发症的发生。结论:手法松解术治疗慢性肩袖损伤安全有效,能更好地改善患者肩关节功能并且缓解疼痛,值得临床推广应用。
Abstract:
To explore the clinical efficacy and safety of closed manipulative release in the treatment of chronic rotator cuff injury.Methods:48 patients with chronic rotator cuff injury were selected from June 2018 to June 2019,Who were randomly divided into observation group(n=24)and control group(n=24).The observation group was treated with ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block anesthesia under manipulative release,the control group was treated with ultrasound-guided subacromial humeral capsule injection.Visual analogue scale(VAS)of pain,shoulder joint range of motion and University of California shoulder joint score(UCLA)were used to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the two groups.Adverse reactions and complications were observed and recorded to evaluate their safety.Results:All patients in the observation group were followed up,while 2 patients in the control group were not followed up,and there were 24 patients in the final observation group(n=24)and 22 patients in the control group(n=22).After treatment,all indicators of shoulder joint improved in both groups.The range of motion and UCLA of shoulder joint in the observation group were better than those in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).VAS score of the observation group was worse than that of the control group at one week after treatment,with statistically significant difference(P<0.05),no statistically significant difference between VAS score at one month and that of the control group(P>0.05),and VAS score at 3 months was better than that of the control group,with statistically significant difference(P<0.05).No complications were found in two groups.Conclusion:Closed manipulative release is safety and efficacy in the treatment of chronic rotator cuff injury,can better improve the function of the shoulder joint and relieve pain,and is worthy of clinical application.

参考文献/References:

[1] 徐得贵,包瑞,郭昊,等.关节镜下肩关节松解术治疗冻结肩的术后疗效与患者术前病程的相关性分析[J].中国骨与关节杂志,2020,9(6):457-464.
[2] 李军,葛恒安,程飚.肩关节镜松解术联合关节腔内几丁糖注射治疗原发性冻结肩[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2018,26(19):1754-1755.
[3] 郑建平,郑琦,刘飞.小针刀配合手法松解治疗慢性肩袖损伤97例[J].浙江中西医结合杂志,2016,26(6):567-569.
[4] 齐英娜,吴迪,李春根,等.铍针联合闭合手法松解术治疗僵硬期冻结肩的疗效评价[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2020,28(3):10-14.
[5] 冷华伟,张均泉,田家亮,等.全肩关节镜和关节镜下小切口治疗肩袖损伤的疗效及对关节功能恢复的影响[J].创伤外科杂志,2020,22(6):461-465.
[6] 赵妍,孙毅,孙志先,等.不同MRI组合序列及扫描方位对肩袖损伤诊断分级及脂肪浸润评分的影响[J].中华介入放射学电子杂志,2019,7(3):239-242.
[7] MALAVOLTA E A,GRACITELLI M,ASSUNCAO J H,et al.Shoulder disorders in an outpatient clinic:an epidemiological study[J].Acta Ortop Bras,2017,25(3):78-80.
[8] ITOI E,ARCE G,BAIN G,et al.Shoulder stiffness:current concepts and concerns[J].Arthroscopy,2016,32(7):1402-1404.
[9] 辛鹏飞,孙友强,李杰,等.生物材料修复肩袖损伤的最新研究热点[J].中国组织工程研究,2020,24(28):4459-4464.
[10] MURAKAMI A M,KOMPEL A J,ENGEBRETSEN L,et al.The epidemiology of MRI detected shoulder injuries in athletes participating in the Rio de Janeiro 2016 Summer Olympics[J].BMC Musculoskelet Disord,2018,19(1):296.
[11] 田玉良,于海泉,曹斌,等.关节镜下单纯肩袖修补术与联合运动手法治疗肩袖损伤合并冻结肩的前瞻性对比研究[J].中国骨与关节杂志,2019,8(8):585-592.
[12] 薛辉,周医斋,帖小佳,等.关节镜下松解术结合肩袖修复术治疗肩袖损伤合并冻结肩疗效分析[J].中国临床医生杂志,2020,48(4):470-471.
[13] HARNIMAN E,CARETTE S,KENNEDY C,et al. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for calcific and noncalcific tendonitis of the rotator cuff:a systematic review[J].J Hand Ther,2004,17(2):132-151.
[14] 王艳华,陈建海.凝肩:ISAKOS上肢委员会专家共识(上)[J].中华肩肘外科电子杂志,2016,4(4):236-242.
[15] 金日龙,杨骥,张驰,等.老年肩袖损伤的特点及治疗进展[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,3(3):190-191.
[16] 李俊,银燕,肖红,等.超声引导臂丛阻滞下肩关节松解术治疗粘连性肩关节囊炎的有效性及安全性分析[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2017,23(1):70-73.
[17] MC CANN A B,JAFF M R.Treatment strategies for peripheral artery disease[J].Expert Opin Pharm Acother,2009,10(10):1571-1586.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
(收稿日期:2020-05-12)基金项目:浦东新区卫生和计划生育委员会特色专 病(PWZzb2017-34) 1上海市浦东新区公利医院(上海,200135) △通信作者 E-mail:djxx02@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-10-10