[1]陈彥均 温涛 许鸿智 侯宇 林定坤△.仰卧前屈拔伸牵引对神经根型颈椎病患者有效椎管横截面积的影响[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2020,28(05):31-34.
　CHEN Yanjun WEN Tao XU Hongzhi HOU Yu LIN Dingkun.The Effect of Supine Flexion Traction on the EffectiveCross-sectional Area of Spinal Canal in Patients withCervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy[J].Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics,2020,28(05):31-34.
点击复制

仰卧前屈拔伸牵引对神经根型颈椎病患者有效椎管横截面积的影响()
分享到：

《中国中医骨伤科杂志》[ISSN:1005-0205/CN:42-1340/R]

卷:
第28卷
期数:
2020年05期
页码:
31-34
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2020-05-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Effect of Supine Flexion Traction on the EffectiveCross-sectional Area of Spinal Canal in Patients withCervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy
文章编号:
1005-0205(2020)05-0031-04
作者:
陈彥均1 温涛2 许鸿智2 侯宇2 林定坤2△
1广州中医药大学第二临床医学院(广州,510405)2广东省中医院脊柱科
Author(s):
CHEN Yanjun1 WEN Tao2 XU Hongzhi2 HOU Yu2 LIN Dingkun2△
1The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China; 2The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China.
关键词:
仰卧前屈拔伸牵引法;  有效椎管横截面积;  神经根型颈椎病;  颈椎动态磁共振
Keywords:
supine flexion traction;  effective cross-sectional area of spinal canal;  cervical spondylotic radiculopathy;  dynamic MRI of cervical spine
分类号:
R681.5
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:观察仰卧前屈拔伸牵引对神经根型颈椎病患者有效椎管横截面积的影响,探讨其改善有效椎管横截面积、减轻脊髓压迫的可能性。 方法:纳入神经根型颈椎病患者30例,其主要压迫节段均为C4～7任一节段,压迫区域均位于椎管内,并已行仰卧前屈拔伸牵引、中立位、后伸位三种状态下的颈椎动态磁共振检查。利用Image J软件测量每个患者三种状态下主要压迫节段的有效椎管横截面积,并进行对比分析。 结果:30例患者在仰卧前屈拔伸牵引下的平均有效椎管横截面积为(147.79±28.87)mm2,中立位为(137.45±31.97)mm2,后伸位为(118.50±31.23)mm2,三者之间差异明显(P<0.01)。 结论:在三种状态下,有效椎管横截面积存在明显的变化规律:仰卧前屈拔伸牵引>中立位>后伸位,提示仰卧前屈拔伸牵引法能增大神经根型颈椎病患者有效椎管横截面积,减轻脊髓压迫,提供一定的修复空间,为防止脊髓进一步受压导致病情进展提供可能性。
Abstract:
Objective: To observe the effect of supine flexion traction on the effective cross-sectional area of spinal canal in patients with Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy, and to explore the possibility of improving the effective cross-sectional area of spinal canal and reducing the compression of spinal cord. Methods: 30 cases of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy were included. The main compression segments were involved C4～7 segment. The compression regions were all located in the spinal canal. Dynamic MRI of cervical spine was performed in three statuses:supine flexion traction, neutral position and extension.Image J software was used to measure the effective cross-sectional area of the main compression segments of each patient in three statuses, and the results were compared and analyzed. Results: The average effective cross-sectional area of spinal canal was(147.79±28.87)mm2 in supine flexion traction(137.45±31.97)mm2 in the neutral position and(118.50±31.23)mm2 in back extension position,and there are obvious differences among the three statuses(P<0.01). Conclusion: In three statuses, the effective cross-sectional area of spinal canal has obvious changes:supine flexion traction > neutral position > back extension position, which suggests that supine flexion traction can increase the effective cross-sectional area of spinal canal, reduce the compression of spinal cord, provide a space for repair, and provide the possibility to prevent the further compression of spinal cord leading to the progress of the disease.

参考文献/References:

[1] 唐镜全,黎元元,王志飞,等.基于社会网络分析的中医药治疗颈椎病学术团队研究[J].中医杂志,2016,57(5):382-386.
[2] 林定坤,陈树东,陈博来,等.仰卧前屈拔伸牵引法治疗无症状退变性伴钳夹型颈脊髓压迫的神经根型颈椎病的效果[J].广东医学,2015,36(17):2686-2689.
[3] 许鸿智,林定坤,陈博来.仰卧前屈拔伸牵引治疗伴退变性脊髓压迫神经根型颈椎病的效果及安全性评价[J].中国医药导报,2018,15(12):53-57.
[4] 党耕町,刘忠军.无症状颈椎退变性脊髓压迫:对一种亚临床状态的思考[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2009,19(1):5-7.
[5] 杨有庚.无症状颈椎退变性颈脊髓压迫的内涵及诊治原则[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2009,19(1):13.
[6] 孙宇.无症状退变性颈脊髓压迫:一种值得深入研究的临床现象[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2009,19(1):12-13.
[7] 张连记.无症状型颈椎退变对脊髓的压迫[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2010,14(28):5276-5280.
[8] TRACY J A, BARTLESON J D.Cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J].Neurologist,2010,16(3):176-187.
[9] 汪波,吴华,杨勇.颈椎病患者X线片解剖参数及病变节段的定量分析[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2012,20(19):1744-1748.
[10] 杨利学,刘智斌,祝海滨.颈椎病角度牵引研究近况[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2006,14(6):82-84.
[11] 姜永宏,王仪生.脊髓型颈椎病CT脊髓造影测量研究[J].中华骨科杂志,1990,10(2):134-137.
[12] 董志锋,任春贞.颈椎病治疗的研究进展[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2018,18(16):105-113.
[13] KARADIMAS S K, GATZOUNIS G, FEHLINGS M G.Pathobiology of cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J].Eur Spine J,2015,24(Suppl 2):132-138.
[14] 文天林,孙天胜.脊髓型颈椎病的病理演变和治疗研究进展[J].人民军医,2017,60(1):75-76.
[15] FEHLINGS M G, TETREAULT L A, WILSON J R,et al.Cervical spondylotic myelopathy:current state of the art and future directions[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2013,38(Suppl 1):S1-S8.
[16] PAVLOV H, TORG J S, ROBIE B,et al.Cervical spinal stenosis:determination with vertebral body ratio method[J].Radiology,1987,164(3):771-775.
[17] TORG J S, PAVLOV H, GENUARIO S E,et al.Neurapraxia of the cervical spinal cord with transient quadriplegia[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,1986,68(9):1354-1370.
[18] 李杰,胡有谷,刘宗礼,等.颈椎侧位X线片测量评估退行性颈椎管狭窄[J].中华骨科杂志,2002(3):20-24.
[19] BLACKLEY H R, PLANK L D, ROBERTSON P A.Determining the sagittal dimensions of the canal of the cervical spine:the reliability of ratios of anatomical measurements[J].J Bone Joint Surg Br,1999,81(1):110-112.
[20] PRASAD S S, O’MALLEY M, CAPLAN M,et al.MRI measurements of the cervical spine and their correlation to Pavlov’s ratio[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2003,28(12):1263-1268.
[21] 魏戌,高云,张兴平,等.基于临床科研信息共享系统的神经根型颈椎病发病特征分析[J].中医杂志,2015,56(19):1663-1666.
[22] 许鸿智,林定坤,陈博来.40例中老年神经根型颈椎病患者多体位MRI观察分析[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2018,26(7):51-53.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:广东省财政厅专项基金(2100601)△通信作者 E-mail:lindingkuntcm@126.com(收稿日期:2019-11-09)
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-05-10