[1]吕昊 彭和兵 司捷.低黏度PKP与高黏度PVP治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效比较[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2020,28(03):44-47.
　LYU Hao PENG Hebing SI Jie.Comparison of Low-viscosity PKP and High-viscosity PVP in Treating Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures[J].Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics,2020,28(03):44-47.
点击复制

低黏度PKP与高黏度PVP治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效比较()
分享到：

《中国中医骨伤科杂志》[ISSN:1005-0205/CN:42-1340/R]

卷:
第28卷
期数:
2020年03期
页码:
44-47
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2020-03-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of Low-viscosity PKP and High-viscosity PVP in Treating Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures
文章编号:
1005-0205(2020)03-0044-04
作者:
吕昊1 彭和兵1 司捷1
1安徽芜湖市第五人民医院骨一科(安徽 芜湖,241000)
Author(s):
LYU Hao1 PENG Hebing1 SI Jie1
1Department of Orthopedics,Wuhu Fifth People's Hospital,Wuhu 241000,Anhui China.
关键词:
骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折;  经皮椎体后凸成形术;  经皮椎体成形术;  骨水泥
Keywords:
osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture;  percutaneous kyphoplasty;  percutaneous vertebroplasty;  bone cement
分类号:
R683.2
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:比较低黏度经皮椎体后凸成形术(PKP)与高黏度经皮椎体成形术(PVP)治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效。方法:选取2015年4月至2018年6月收治的66例单椎体骨质疏松性压缩骨折患者为研究对象,按照简单随机分组方法,将其分为对照组(低黏度骨水泥PKP)和研究组(高黏度骨水泥PVP),两组各33例。比较两组患者手术时间、透视次数、骨水泥渗漏率、骨水泥量和手术前后椎体后凸Cobb角、前缘高度、视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)的差异。结果:研究组骨水泥渗漏率和骨水泥量明显低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。研究组手术时间和透视次数明显少于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。两组患者术后1周和4周VAS评分与术前比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01); 研究组术前1 d、术后1周和4周VAS评分与对照组比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者术后3个月和12个月ODI值与术前比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01); 研究组术前1 d、术后3个月和12个月ODI值与对照组比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。研究组术后椎体后凸Cobb角和椎体前缘高度与术前相比,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。对照组术后椎体后凸Cobb角和椎体前缘高度与术前相比,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。两组间术前及术后的椎体后凸Cobb角和椎体前缘高度相比,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:高黏度骨水泥PVP在骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折治疗中应用价值较高,值得推广应用。
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the efficacy of low-viscosity percutaneous kyphoplasty(PKP)and high-viscosity percutaneous vertebroplasty(PVP)in treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.Methods:66 patients with osteoporotic compression fractures of single vertebral body admitted to our hospital from April 2015 to June 2018 were selected as the research objects.According to the simple random grouping method,they were divided into control group(low-viscosity bone cement PKP)and research group(high-viscous bone cement PVP)with 33 cases in each group.The operation time,fluoroscopy times,cement leakage rate,cement volume and Cobb angle,anterior margin height,visual analogue scale(VAS),Oswestry dysfunction index(ODI)of kyphosis before and after surgery were compared between the two groups.Results:The leakage rate and amount of bone cement in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group(P<0.01).The operation time and fluoroscopy times in the study group were significantly less than those in the control group,and the statistically significant difference was found(P<0.01).The VAS scores of the two groups at 1 week and 4 weeks after operation were significantly different from those before operation(P<0.01); the VAS scores of the study group at 1 d before operation,1 week after operation and 4 weeks after operation were not significantly different from those of the control group(P>0.05).The ODI of the two groups at 3 and 12 months after operation were significantly different from those before operation(P<0.01); the ODI of the study group at 1 d before operation,3 and 12 months after operation were not significantly different from those of the control group(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in Cobb angle of kyphosis and anterior height of vertebral body before and after surgery in research group(P>0.05).The Cobb angle of kyphosis and anterior height of vertebral body in control group were significantly different from those before operation(P<0.01).There was no significant difference in Cobb angle of kyphosis and anterior vertebral height between the two groups before and after operation(P>0.05).Conclusion:High-viscous bone cement PVP has high application value in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture,and it is worth popularizing.

参考文献/References:

[1] 陈懿,陈晟,李作灵,等.Jack椎体扩张器后凸成形术与球囊扩张后凸成形术对骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效比较[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2018,43(2):210-212.
[2] 周英杰,赵刚,刘宏建,等.复合BMP的磷酸钙骨水泥应用于椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩骨折15例[J].郑州大学学报:医学版,2009,44(5):1101-1103.
[3] 马建华,王庆雷.高粘度骨水泥对不同程度骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折经皮椎体成形术的疗效影响及其弥散分析[J].中国基层医药,2018,25(21):2721-2725.
[4] 党耕町.骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2007:70-89.
[5] 中华医学会骨质疏松和骨矿盐疾病分会.骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折诊疗与管理专家共识[J].中华骨质疏松和骨矿盐疾病杂志,2018,11(5):425-437.
[6] HELLER G Z,MANUGUERRA M,CHOW R.How to analyze the visual analogue scale:myths,truths and clinical relevance[J].Scand J Pain,2016,13(1):67-75.
[7] 程继伟,王振林,刘伟,等.Oswestry功能障碍指数的改良及信度和效度检验[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2017,27(3):235-241.
[8] 翟莎,张金明,邢惠芳,等.骨质疏松性脊柱压缩骨折经皮椎体后突成形术后抗骨质疏松药物的疗效观察[J].河北医科大学学报,2015,36(12):1393-1396.
[9] GUO D,CAI J,ZHANG S,et al.Treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with intraosseous vacuum phenomena using high-viscosity bone cement via bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty[J].Medicine,2017,96(14):e6549.
[10] GUO Z,WANG W,GAO W S,et al.Comparison the clinical outcomes and complications of high-viscosity versus low-viscosity in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures[J].Medicine,2017,96(48):e8936.
[11] 吴四军,刘正,姚洪春,等.应用高黏度骨水泥PVP治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折与传统PKP的临床疗效比较[J].中华骨科杂志,2017,37(2):74-79.
[12] 邓亦奇,赵峰,李国华,等.中粘度与高粘度骨水泥治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效对比[J].颈腰痛杂志,2016,37(1):17-22.
[13] 杭海峰,汤新兵,于健.高粘度联合夯实技术在PKP治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折中的临床效果观察[J].实用临床医药杂志,2018,22(7):93-95.
[14] 陈志鹏,秦毅,王素伟,等.高黏度与低黏度骨水泥椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松椎体压缩性骨折的疗效观察[J].中华生物医学工程杂志,2017,23(5):401-406.
[15] 李光辉,刘志军,段建辉,等.PVP治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折967例近期随访研究[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2016,24(12):58-60.
[16] 黎泽森,曾巧.PVP与PKP在治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的临床效果及患者VAS、ODI指数影响[J].河北医学,2018,24(7):1057-1060.
[17] 季宝兵,薛理新,戴桂龙.经皮椎体成形术与椎体后凸成形术治疗老年骨质疏松性椎体骨折的疗效比较[J].实用临床医药杂志,2018,22(22):51-53.

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-03-01