[1]朱宝 赵继荣△ 张彦军 邓强 郭铁峰.经椎旁肌间隙入路治疗胸腰椎骨折的临床研究[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2020,28(02):33-37.
　ZHU Bao ZHAO Jirong ZHANG Yanjun DENG Qiang GUO Tiefeng.Clinical Study of Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fracture Treatedby Paraspinal Space Approach[J].Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics,2020,28(02):33-37.
点击复制

经椎旁肌间隙入路治疗胸腰椎骨折的临床研究()
分享到：

《中国中医骨伤科杂志》[ISSN:1005-0205/CN:42-1340/R]

卷:
第28卷
期数:
2020年02期
页码:
33-37
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2020-02-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical Study of Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fracture Treatedby Paraspinal Space Approach
文章编号:
1005-0205(2020)02-0033-05
作者:
朱宝1 赵继荣1△ 张彦军1 邓强1 郭铁峰1
1甘肃省中医院(兰州,730050)
Author(s):
ZHU Bao1 ZHAO Jirong1△ ZHANG Yanjun1 DENG Qiang1 GUO Tiefeng1
1Gansu Province Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Lanzhou 730050,China.
关键词:
椎旁肌间隙入路;  胸腰椎骨折;  经皮置钉;  微创
Keywords:
paraspinal approach;  thoracolumbar vertebral fracture;  percutaneous pedicle screw-rod fixation;  minimally invasive surgery
分类号:
R683.2
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:分析胸腰椎骨折选择经椎旁肌间隙入路术式治疗的临床疗效。方法:收集符合标准的胸椎腰椎骨折患者,经椎旁肌间隙入路术式患者48例与经皮置钉术式患者31例进行对比分析,测量两组患者术后切口总长度、术中软组织损伤程度、术中出血量及术前、术后1周、术后6个月伤椎前缘高度丢失率等指标,整理数据并通过统计学软件进行分析。结果:术前病例一般资料比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),具有可比性; 两组患者术前伤椎前缘高度丢失率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),具有可比性; 组间比较时,术后1周和术后6个月伤椎前缘高度丢失率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),椎旁肌间隙入路组较经皮置钉组能够更好恢复椎体前缘高度; 组内比较时,两组患者术后1周和术后6个月椎体前缘高度丢失率与术前比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组患者均能较好复位伤椎前缘高度; 两组患者术后6个月与术后1周椎体前缘高度丢失率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后患者伤椎前缘高度无明显丢失。两组切口总长度比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),经皮置钉组切口总长度较椎旁肌间隙入路短。两组患者CK比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),椎旁肌间隙入路较经皮置钉组软组织损伤小。两组患者术中出血量比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),两组患者术中出血量无差异。结论:经椎旁肌间隙入路术式具有软组织损伤程度轻、出血少、并发症少等特点,是一种有效治疗无神经损伤的胸腰椎骨折的微创化术式选择。
Abstract:
Objective:To analyze the clinical effect of paraspinal space approach for thoracolumbar vertebral fracture.Methods:Patients with thoracolumbar vertebral fractures who met the criteria were compared and analyzed,and forty-eight patients were treated by paraspinal space approach pedical screw-rod fixation and thirty-one patients were treated by percutaneous pedical screw-rod fixation.The total length of the incision,the degree of soft tissue injury,the amount of bleeding during the operation were measured in the two groups,and the preoperative,1 week and 6 months after operation the injury vertebral leading edge height loss rate and other indicators were measured also.The recorded data was analyzed with statistical software.Results:There was no statistically significant difference in two groups of the general information and the loss of anterior vertebral edge height before surgery(P>0.05).When comparing between groups,the loss rate of anterior vertebral height of the injured vertebral at 1 week and 6 months after operation was compared the paraspinal space approach better than the percutaneous pedical screw-rod fixation(P<0.05).There was significant difference compared 1 week and 6 months after surgery with preoperative in every groups in the rate of loss of anterior vertebral edge height(P<0.05).The anterior margin of the injured vertebral could be better reset in two groups.The rate of vertebral anterior margin height loss was compared between the two groups postoperative 6 months and postoperative 1 week,there was no significant loss of anterior edge height postoperative(P>0.05).Total incision length was significantly shortened in percutaneous pedicle screw-rod fixation group as compared with it in the paraspinal space approach group(P<0.05).The soft tissue damage was significantly less in paraspinal space approach group as compared with it in the percutaneous pedicle screw-rod fixation by the CK(P<0.05).There was no difference in the intraoperative blood loss between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:The paraspinal space approach is characterized by mild soft tissue injury,less bleeding and fewer complications,it is an effective minimally invasive surgical method for the treatment of thoracolumbar vertebral fracture without nerve injury.

参考文献/References:

[1] WILTSE L L,BATEMAN J G,HUTCHINSON R H,et al.The paraspinal sacrospinalis- splitting approach to the lumbar spine[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,1968,50(5):919-926.
[2] WILTSE L L,SPENCER C W.New uses and refinements of the paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine[J].Spine(Phila Pa1976),1988,13(6):696-706.
[3] 郑亚东,陆生林.经椎旁肌间隙入路治疗胸腰椎骨折的研究进展[J].微创医学,2018,13(6):782-784.
[4] 彭小忠,肖侃侃.微创与开放方案置入椎弓根螺钉内固定修复胸腰椎骨折[J].中国组织工程研究,2014,18(26):4212-4214.
[5] 罗万荣,易伟宏,杨大志,等.两种术式下髓核摘除对椎旁肌肉损伤及近期疗效的比较[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2013,7(19):8926-8928.
[6] 顾勇杰,赵刘军,于亮,等.后路短节段伤椎经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗A3型和A4型胸腰段骨折[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2016,26(5):395-400.
[7] 陶玉平,王永祥,王静成,等.经椎旁肌间隙入路微创小切口在胸腰椎骨折手术的应用[J].江苏医药,2012,38(10):1204-1206.
[8] 梁昌凡,陈浩,徐应林,等.两种入路方式治疗无神经损伤性胸腰段脊柱压缩性骨折的比较[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2014,22(12):50-51.
[9] 赵明,廖怀章,孙江波,等.经皮椎弓根螺钉治疗胸腰段椎体骨折的临床应用[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2018,26(9):60-62.
[10] 李驰,郭中华,原野.经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定术治疗胸腰椎骨折的临床研究[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2017,25(8):39-42.
[11] FAN Y,ZHANG J,HE X,et al.A comparison of the mini-open wiltse approach with pedicle screw fixation and the percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for neurologically intact thoracolumbar fractures[J].Med Sci Monit,2017,20(23):5515-5521.
[12] JUNHUI L,ZHENGBAO P,WENBIN X,et al.Comparison of pedicle fixation by the Wiltse approach and the conventional posterior open approach for thoracolumbar fractures,using MRI,histological and electrophysiological analyses of the multifidus muscle[J].Eur Spine J,2017,26(5):1506-1514.
[13] GUIROY A,SíCOLI A,MASANéS N G,et al.How to perform the Wiltse posterolateral spinal approach:Technical note[J].Surg Neurol Int,2018,14(9):38-45.
[14] 李怀玮,阿海,朱斌,等.不同入路椎弓根钉内固定治疗无神经损伤胸腰椎骨折的疗效比较[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2018,33(3):272-274.
[15] WARREN A,PRASAD V,THOMAS M.Pre-operative planning when using the Wiltse approach to the lumbar spine[J].Ann R Coll Surg Engl,2010,92(1):74-75.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
△通信作者 E-mail:376453811@qq.com(收稿日期:2019-06-11)
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-02-10