[1]何天福 韩长青 王国华△.重刺“椎间孔穴”治疗低位腰椎间盘突出症的疗效[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2018,26(04):29-32.
　HE Tianfu HAN Changqing WANG Guohua.Effect of Deep Needling at Acupoint “Intervertebral Foramen” on Lower Lumbar Disc Herniation[J].Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics,2018,26(04):29-32.
点击复制

重刺“椎间孔穴”治疗低位腰椎间盘突出症的疗效()
分享到：

《中国中医骨伤科杂志》[ISSN:1005-0205/CN:42-1340/R]

卷:
第26卷
期数:
2018年04期
页码:
29-32
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2018-04-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of Deep Needling at Acupoint “Intervertebral Foramen” on Lower Lumbar Disc Herniation
文章编号:
1005-0205(2018)04-0029-04
作者:
何天福1 韩长青2 王国华1△
1北京市中西医结合医院(北京,100039) 2北京市石景山医院
Author(s):
HE Tianfu1 HAN Changqing2 WANG Guohua1△
1Beijing Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine,Beijing 100039,China; 2Shijingshan Hospital of Beijing,Beijing 100043,China.
关键词:
重刺“椎间孔穴”;  传统针刺;  低位腰椎间盘突出症
Keywords:
Keywords: deep needling at acupoint “intervertebral foramen”;  traditional acupuncture;  lower lumbar disc herniation
分类号:
R681.5
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:评价重刺“椎间孔穴”治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效。方法:将70例腰椎间盘突出症患者随机分为“椎间孔穴”组和传统针刺组,各35 例。“椎间孔穴”组采用以重刺患侧椎间孔穴为主加低频电子脉冲治疗; 传统针刺组采用传统针刺取穴和手法加低频电子脉冲治疗。以日本整形外科学会(JOA)下腰痛评分系统评价患者的病情改善情况,观察两组第1及2个疗程结束时及治疗后1及3个月的优良率与总有效率。结果:各组第1及2个疗程结束时及治疗后1及3个月JOA评分与治疗前比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05); “椎间孔穴”组第1及2个疗程结束时及治疗后1及3个月的优良率和总有效率为54.3%和77.1%,77.1%和91.4%,85.7%和94.3%,88.6%和94.3%,均优于传统针刺组第1及2个疗程结束时及治疗后1及3个月的优良率和总有效率(37.1%和62.3%,57.1%和71.4%,62.3%和74.3%,57.1%和74.4%),两组优良率和有效率组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:重刺“椎间孔穴”治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效优于传统针刺治疗。
Abstract:
Abstract Objective:To evaluate the effect of deep needling at acupoint “intervertebral foramen” on lower lumbar disc herniation.Methods:Seventy patients with lower lumbar disc herniation were divided randomly into “intervertebral foramen” acupoint group and traditional acupuncture group,35 cases in each group.Patients in “intervertebral foramen acupoint” group were treated by acupuncture on “intervertebral foramen acupoint” and the traditional acupuncture group was treated by traditional acupuncture.The results were evaluated according to the JOA scoring system at the end of first,second courses and 1 and 3 months after treatment,and the excellent and good rate of patients will be compared between the two groups.Results:Compared with those before treatment,the JOA scores at the end of first,second courses and 1 and 3 months after treatment were statistically significant(P< 0.05).At the end of first,second courses and 1 and 3 months after treatment,the excellent and good rate in “intervertebral foramen acupoint” group were 54.3% and 77.1%,77.1% and 91.4%,85.7% and 94.3%,88.6% and 94.3% respectively,while in traditional acupuncture group were 37.1% and 62.3%,57.1% and 71.4%,62.3% and 74.3%,57.1% and 74.4%,and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P< 0.05).Conclusion:The efficacy of deep needling at acupoint “intervertebral foramen” is more effective than traditional acupuncture for the treatment of low lumbar disc herniation.

参考文献/References:

[1] 李伟,胡秋生,焦永波.传统针刺手法治疗腰椎间盘突出症研究进展[J].河南中医,2015,35(10):2427-2428.
[2] 孙江涛,李宇卫,沈晓峰,等.中医络病学说与腰椎间盘突出症证治关系探析[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2016,24(7):80-82.
[3] 李娟红,李桂英,程斌.华佗夹脊穴(腰段)针刺深度及穴位注射后迁移轨迹的CT影响定位探析[J].上海针灸杂志,2013,32(9):774-777.
[4] 薛建军.西方针刺方法与传统针灸治疗慢性疼痛的异与同[J].西部中医药,2013,26(4):84-86.
[5] 洪海平,卫晓恩,陈勇,等.电针腰突穴治疗腰椎间盘突出症[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2014,22(3):39-40.
[6] 万有.针刺镇痛与针麻镇痛及其机制研究[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2013,19(2):65.
[7] 侯渊涛,冯艺.针刺镇痛的fMRI机制研究进展[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2017,23(3):205-209.
[8] 杨海龙,周胜红,张永臣,等.针灸治疗腰椎间盘突出症的机制研究进展[J].上海针灸杂志,2017,36(3):365-370.
[9] 王富明,孙华,张亚敏.腰椎间盘突出症针灸干预临床研究进展[J].针灸临床杂志,2013,30(3):68-70.
[10] 戴荣水,郭伟.神经干刺激疗法治疗腰椎间盘突出症[J].针灸临床杂志,2011,27(5):39-41.
[11] 姜东,朱彩霞.筋骨刺法治疗腰椎间盘突出症40 例[J].中医临床研究,2016,8(32):97-98.
[12] 郑文贤,黄玉栋,翁海展.不同针刺体位治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床研究[J].针灸临床杂志,2013,29(4):23-26.
[13] 侯学思,孟旭,王影,等.针刺治疗腰椎间盘突出症不同留针时间的疗效对比研究[J].针灸临床杂志,2016,32(8):5-8.
[14] 李淸,Mary X Wu.针刺操作技术标准化考核之构想—来自欧美外科技术定量评估的启示[J].针刺研究,2011,36(6):449-452.
[15] 李传健,杨庆贤,钟光明,等.L4～L5和L5～S1旁椎间孔注射穿刺入路的应用解剖研究[J].解剖学研究,2013,35(1):58-60.
[16] 赵庆豪,史本超,钟恩意,等.L5/S1椎间孔内韧带的形态和分布规律[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2016,26(4):335-341.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
△通信作者 E-mail:23258395@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-04-15