[1]宋建东△ 陈子健 李停 李长文 徐红辉 孙勇.单、双侧经椎弓根途径PKP术治疗骨质疏松性胸椎压缩性骨折的临床疗效对比[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2017,25(11):33-35.
　SONG Jiandong CHEN Zijian LI Ting LI Changwen XU Honghui SUN Yong.Comparison of the Clinical Effects of Unilateral Versus Bilateral PKP for Treating Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures[J].Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics,2017,25(11):33-35.
点击复制

单、双侧经椎弓根途径PKP术治疗骨质疏松性胸椎压缩性骨折的临床疗效对比()
分享到：

《中国中医骨伤科杂志》[ISSN:1005-0205/CN:42-1340/R]

卷:
第25卷
期数:
2017年11期
页码:
33-35
栏目:
临床论著
出版日期:
2017-11-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of the Clinical Effects of Unilateral Versus Bilateral PKP for Treating Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures
文章编号:
1005-0205(2017)11-0033-03
作者:
宋建东1△ 陈子健1 李停1 李长文1 徐红辉1 孙勇1
1湖北省中西医结合医院骨科(武汉,430015) △通信作者 E-mail:songorth@163.com
Author(s):
SONG Jiandong1△ CHEN Zijian1 LI Ting1 LI Changwen1 XU Honghui1 SUN Yong1
1Department of Orthopedics,Hubei Provincial Hospital of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine,Wuhan 430015,China.
关键词:
单侧;  双侧;  椎体后凸成形术;  骨质疏松;  胸椎压缩性骨折
Keywords:
Keywords: unilateral;  bilateral;  percutaneous kyphoplasty;  osteoporosis;  thoracic vertebra compression fractures
分类号:
R683.2
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:比较经单侧与双侧椎弓根途径行经皮穿刺球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术(PKP术)治疗骨质疏松性胸椎压缩性骨折的临床效果。方法:本院骨科2013年1月至2017年1月因骨质疏松性胸椎压缩骨折行PKP手术治疗的160例患者纳入研究,根据手术穿刺通道不同分为单侧组与双侧组,比较两组患者手术一般情况、手术前后的Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)、伤椎体高度变化。结果:两组患者术后的ODI指数、伤椎体高度相比手术前均显著改善,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),单侧组与双侧组之间无明显差异,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但单侧组手术时间、术中骨水泥使用量及透视次数明显低于双侧组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:经单侧或双侧椎弓根途径行PKP术治疗骨质疏松性胸椎压缩性骨折临床效果相似,但经单侧椎弓根途径的PKP手术时间短、放射暴露少、骨水泥用量少,且术后发生骨水泥渗漏的概率更小。
Abstract:
Abstract Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy of unilateral and bilateral balloon percutaneous kyphoplasty(PKP)in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures(OVCF).Methods:All 80 patients with OVCF,were operated with PKP in the department of orthopedics in our hospital from January 2013 to January 2017,who were divided into unilateral group and bilateral group according to the different ways of surgical choice.The inclusion criteria,ODI index,the changes of vertebral height of two groups before and after operation were compared.Results:The postoperative ODI index and vertebral height of two groups were significantly improved than that before(P<0.01).Nevertheless,there was no significant difference between unilateral and bilateral groups(P>0.05).But the operative time,bone cement usage and the number of fluoroscopy of unilateral group was significantly less than that of bilateral group(P<0.05).Conclusion:Both unilateral and bilateral PKP is similarly clinical effective for treating OVCF.The unilateral PKP is with the advantages of small wounds,shorter operation time,smaller radiation,less bone cement,and lower risk of bone cement leakage.

参考文献/References:

[1] 任海龙,王吉兴,陈建庭,等.单侧与双侧经椎弓根入路经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效比较[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2014,16(8):684-689.
[2] 蔡佳,郝应文,李超,等.经皮椎体成形骨水泥注入修复骨质疏松性胸腰椎体压缩骨折:椎弓根入路方案[J].中国组织工程研究,2015,19(30):4892-4897.
[3] 冯宇,王涵韬,陈滨,等.局麻下单侧与双侧PVP治疗老年骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效比较[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2014,22(11):911-914.
[4] 王玺,寇剑铭,贾学军,等.单、双侧椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的临床疗效比较[J].中国老年学杂志,2016,36(16):4012-4014.
[5] 肖良,徐宏光,刘平,等.单双侧入路经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效比较[J].皖南医学院学报,2015,34(6):533-537.
[6] 骆洪涛,王金强,闫伟,等.单侧与双侧经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折有效性与安全性比较的Meta分析[J].中华损伤与修复杂志:电子版,2015,10(4):25-29.
[7] 黄立军,夏庆福,王伟,等.单侧椎弓根旁入路经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩性骨折研究[J].现代仪器与医疗,2016,22(2):88-90.
[8] 刘奕,沈海敏,董健,等.经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折后新发椎体骨折的危险因素分析[J].中华创伤杂志,2016,32(11):1009-1013.
[9] 孙晓辉.改良经皮椎体成形术在老年骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折中的应用价值[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(3):682-683.
[10] 王大寿,贺纯静,吴黔鸣,等.经皮椎体成形术治疗重度骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效评价[J].中华创伤杂志,2016,32(8):720-723.
[11] 黄昊,何仕诚,方文,等.经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松疼痛性椎体压缩骨折的临床疗效分析[J].中华医学杂志,2014,94(27):2119-2122.
[12] 孙浩林,李淳德,朱佳琳,等.PVP 或 PKP 治疗激素诱导骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的临床研究[J].北京大学学报:医学版,2015,19(2):242-247.
[13] 孙良业,吕波,凤晓翔,等.经皮椎体成形术和后凸成形术治疗老年骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效分析[J].山东医药,2014,54(12):54-56.
[14] 王翀,李京,田征,等.经皮椎体成形术与非手术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的Meta分析[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2014,22(6):493-498.
[15] 许靖,黄胜,巫培康,等.经皮椎体成形术后非手术椎体骨折的相关危险因素[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2014,23(1):63-67.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01