[1]汤瑨 李正兴 魏学东△ 王培民 叶盛开.甩肩疗法治疗肱骨外科颈骨折与钢板内固定术的临床对比研究[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2016,24(06):25-28.
　TANG Jin LI Zhengxing WEI Xuedong WANG Peimin YE Shengkai.Comparison of LPHP and Swing Shoulder for TreatingHumerus Surgical Neck Fractures[J].Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics,2016,24(06):25-28.
点击复制

甩肩疗法治疗肱骨外科颈骨折与钢板内固定术的临床对比研究
分享到：

《中国中医骨伤科杂志》[ISSN:1005-0205/CN:42-1340/R]

卷:
第24卷
期数:
2016年06期
页码:
25-28
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2016-06-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of LPHP and Swing Shoulder for TreatingHumerus Surgical Neck Fractures
文章编号:
1005-0205(2016)06-0025-04
作者:
汤瑨1 李正兴1 魏学东2; 3; 4△ 王培民2; 3; 4 叶盛开1
1.南京中医药大学第一临床医学院(南京,210029)
2.南京中医药大学附属医院
3.南京中医药大学附属医院,全国名中医诸方受传承工作室
4.南京中医药大学附属医院,全国名中医周福贻传承工作室△.通信作者 E-mail:54hhwxd@163.com
Author(s):
TANG Jin1 LI Zhengxing1 WEI Xuedong2; 3; 4△ WANG Peimin2; 3; 4 YE Shengkai1
1.The First Clinical College, Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine; 2.Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine; 3.The Inheritance Studio of Famous Aged Chinese Doctor Zhu Fangshou,Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine; 4.The Inheritance Studio of Famous Aged Chinese Doctor Zhou Fuyi,Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
关键词:
肱骨外科颈骨折;  肱骨近端锁定钢板内固定术;  甩肩疗法
Keywords:
humerus surgical neck fractures;  lock proximal humerus plate;  swing shoulder for treatment
分类号:
R683.41
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:比较甩肩疗法治疗肱骨外科颈骨折与钢板内固定术的疗效差异。方法:回顾性研究自2014年9月至2015年4月江苏省中医院骨伤科收治的41例肱骨外科颈骨折患者,其中17例行肱骨近端锁定钢板内固定(手术组),24例行甩肩疗法治疗(甩肩治疗组)。对比两组病例住院时间、骨折愈合时间、肩关节Constant评分。结果:两组年龄、性别、骨折分型无明显差异(P>0.05)。甩肩治疗组住院时间为(10.75±1.70)d明显短于手术组(14.65±2.37)d,骨折愈合时间为(13.96±1.20)周短于手术组(15.71±1.05)周,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。两组患者在术后6月肩关节Constant评分中疼痛评分,ADL,ROM,肌力及Constant总分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:肱骨近端锁定钢板内固定术与甩肩疗法治疗NeerⅡ,Ⅲ型的肱骨外科颈骨折的疗效类似,但甩肩疗法住院时间及骨折愈合时间较短,操作简便,费用低廉,能尽可能减少对肩关节软组织的二次损伤,避免手术引起的创伤加重及血运破坏,从而有利于促进软组织功能的恢复以及骨折愈合。
Abstract:
Objective: To compare clinical effect of lock proximal humerus plate and swing shoulder in treating humerus surgical neck fractures. Methods: Retrospective studied forty one patients with humerus surgical neck fractures from September 2014 to October 2015 in orthopedic department of Jiangsu province hospital of traditional Chinese medicine. Seventeen patients were treated with lock proximal humerus plate(surgery group), and 24 patients were treated with swing shoulder method(swing shoulder group). The length of stay, bone union time and Constant-Murley functional scoring were compared between two groups after treatment. Results: There were no significant difference in age, gender and fracture types between the two groups(P>0.05). The length of hospital stay in the swing shoulder group(13.96±1.20)days was shorter than the lock proximal humerus plate group(14.65±2.37)days. The bone union time in the operation group(15.71±1.05)weeks was longer than the swing shoulder group(13.96±1.20)weeks(P<0.01). There was no significant difference in pain score, ADL, ROM, myodynamia, and Constant scores between the two groups after treatment(P>0.05). Conclusion: The clinical efficacy of lock proximal humerus plate in treatment of Neer type Ⅱ and type Ⅲ of humerus surgical neck fractures is similar to swing shoulder. However, the time of hospitalization and fracture healing time is shorter, the operation is simpler and the cost is lower in swing shoulder group. It can reduce the second injury of parenchyma around the shoulder joint and avoid the injury caused by the operation. It can promote the recovery of soft tissues and fractures.

参考文献/References:

[1] 赖锦培.辨证分型治疗肱骨外科颈骨折62例临床观察[J].实用中医内科杂志,2013,35(17):74-75.
[2] 孙培锋,宋展昭,夏国峰,等.肱骨近端锁定钢板治疗肱骨外科颈骨折不愈合的临床分析 [J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2011,26(5):474-475.
[3] 李勇军,牛素林,徐胜.手法整复经皮闭合穿针治疗肱骨外科颈骨折46例 [J].中医正骨,2009,10(22):789.
[4] Foruria AM,Carrascal MT,RevillaC,et al.Proximal humerus fracture rotational stadility after fixation using a locking plate or a fixed-angle locked nail:the role of implant stiffness [J].Clinical Biomechanics,2010,25(4):307-311.
[5] Koukakis A,Apostolou CD,Taneja T,et al.Fixation of proximal humerus fractures using the PHILOS plate:early experience [J].Clinorthop Relat Res,2006,442:115-120.
[6] 丁敬邦.三种内固定治疗肱骨外科颈骨折的疗效分析 [D].长沙:中南大学,2007:1-38.
[7] 李红专,李盛华.手法复位小夹板与外固定支架外固定治疗内收型肱骨外科颈骨折135例 [J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2013,21(11):48-49.
[8] 宫大伟,刘波,谢波.经肱骨外上髁后方入路弹性髓内钉治疗肱骨外科颈骨折31例 [J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2013,21(8):53-54.
[9] 高大硕.闭式穿针内固定治疗肱骨外科颈骨折 [J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2012,10(5):52-53.
[10] 张艺平,孙之镐,方楚权.肩臂形态塑形三块夹板治疗肱骨外科颈骨折的临床研究 [J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2012,20(2):31-33.
[11] 何升华,彭力平,马笃军.人工肱骨头置换术治疗老年肱骨外科颈粉碎性骨折49例 [J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2013,21(10):23-25.
[12] 高曦,黄朱宋,关勇.老年肱骨外科颈骨折钢板固定疗效分析 [J].中外医学研究,2015,3(13):11-12.
[13] 马俊,张佳田,王卫明.肱骨外科颈骨折应用LPHP内固定手术治疗体会 [J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2015,4(36):528.
[14] 毕红宾,王永清,李毅.肱骨近端锁定钢板与髓内钉治疗老年肱骨近端二部分骨折疗效比较 [J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2015,23(12):34-37.
[15] 任国飞.甩肩疗法治疗肱骨外科颈骨折疗效观察 [D].南京:南京中医药大学,2014.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:2011年全国名老中医药专家诸方受教授传承工作室建设项目
2014年全国名老中医药专家周福贻教授传承工作室建设项目
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-06-15