[1]林然 陈顺有 林清坚.两种手术方式治疗儿童Ⅲ型肱骨髁上骨折的疗效对比[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2015,23(09):33-36.
　LIN Ran CHEN Shunyou LIN Qingjian.Comparison of Curative Effect of Two Surgical Methods for Treatmenting of Gartland Ⅲ Type of Supracondylar Humerus Fracture in Children[J].Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics,2015,23(09):33-36.
点击复制

两种手术方式治疗儿童Ⅲ型肱骨髁上骨折的疗效对比
分享到：

《中国中医骨伤科杂志》[ISSN:1005-0205/CN:42-1340/R]

卷:
第23卷
期数:
2015年09期
页码:
33-36
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2015-09-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of Curative Effect of Two Surgical Methods for Treatmenting of Gartland Ⅲ Type of Supracondylar Humerus Fracture in Children
文章编号:
1005-0205(2015)09-0033-04
作者:
林然1 陈顺有1 林清坚1
1.福州市第二医院小儿骨科(福州,350007)
Author(s):
LIN Ran1 CHEN Shunyou1 LIN Qingjian1
1.Department of Pediatric Orthopedics, Fuzhou Second Hospital, Fuzhou 350007, China.
关键词:
肱骨髁上骨折;  闭合复位;  切开复位;  克氏针内固定
Keywords:
supracondylar humerus fracture;  close reduction;  open reduction;  kirschner wires fixation
分类号:
R683.41
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:研究切开复位内固定术与闭合复位内固定术治疗儿童Ⅲ型肱骨髁上骨折的疗效。方法:回顾性分析2011年6 月- 2014年6 月本院诊治的儿童Ⅲ型肱骨髁上骨折患者,所接受的治疗分为切开组(切开复位内固定术组)和闭合组(闭合复位内固定术组)。其中切开组110 例,闭合组101例; 男129例,女82例; 年龄1～ 13岁,平均5.4 岁; 术后平均随访24.2个月(6～36个月)。所有患者都是在全麻下进行,手术由同一个医师完成。肘关节功能根据Flynn评价标准对两组于术后4,8,16周进行功能评定,同时对两组的术中出血、手术时间、骨折愈合时间与肘关节活动功能恢复时间比较分析。结果:切开组和闭合组Flynn功能评定,术后4周(P=0.649),8周(P=0.978),16周(P=0.935)差异无统计学意义,两组骨折愈合时间对比(P>0.05)及肘关节活动功能恢复时间均无统计学意义(P>0.05),但是在术中出血和手术时间方面差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:切开与闭合复位内固定术对治疗肱骨髁上骨折都有效果,手术时可优先行闭合复位内固定术,再考虑切开复位内固定术。
Abstract:
Objective: To observe the curative effect of open reduction fixation and internal fixation with closed reduction for treating of Gartland Ⅲ type of supracondylar humerus fracture in children. Methods: Retrospective analyzed 211 children with Gartland Ⅲ type of supracondylar humerus fracture in the Fuzhou second hospital from June 2011 to June 2014. They were divided into open reduction fixation group(n=110)and internal fixation with closed reduction group(n=101). There were 129 male and 82 female, aged 1 to 13 years old(5.4 years old averagely). They were followed-up for 6 to 36 months(24.2 months averagely). All patients were performed under general anesthesia, and the surgery was performed by the same one surgeon. The elbow joint function was evaluated according to Flynn evaluation criteria in the two groups 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks after surgery. The amount of bleeding, the operation time, the fracture healing time, and the function recovery time of elbow joint were compared between the two groups. Results: All children achieved union in a mean time of 4 weeks(range: 3-6 weeks). The Flynn evaluation was not significantly different between the two gropus at 4th, 8th, and 16th weeks after surgery(P=0.649,P=0.978,P=0.935 respectively). The fracture healing time and the function recovery time of elbow joint was not significantly different between the two gropus(P>0.05), but the amount of bleeding and the operation time was significantly different(P<0.01). Conclusion: The open reduction fixation and internal fixation with closed reduction are both effective for treating Gartland Ⅲ type of supracondylar humerus fracture in children. It is priority to consider the internal fixation with closed reduction, and then the open reduction fixation.

参考文献/References:

[1] Nikoli H,Bukvi N,Tomasi Z,et al.Bone remodeling after supracondylar humeral fracture in children[J].Coll Antropol,2014,38(2):601-604.
[2] Isa AD,Furey A,Stone C.Functional outcome of supracondylar elbow fractures in children:a 3- to 5-year follow-up[J].Can J Surg,2014,57(4):241-246.
[3] 李东胜,孙东平,王健军.低龄低位伸直型肱骨髁上骨折的切开复位及内外固定治疗体会[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2011,26(5):463-464.
[4] Basaran SH,Ercin E,Bilgili MG,et al.A new joystick technique for unsuccessful closed reduction of supracondylar humeral fractures:minimum trauma[J].Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol,2015,25(2):297-303.
[5] Abbott MD,Buchler L,Loder RT,et al.Gartland type III supracondylar humerus fractures:outcome and complications as related to operative timing and pin configuration[J].J Child Orthop,2014,8(6):473-477.
[6] 杨建平.儿童肱骨髁上骨折的现代处理[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2009,11(4):302-305.
[7] Sun LJ,Wu ZP,Yang J,et al.Factors associated with a failed closed reduction for supracondylar fractures in children[J].Orthop Traumatol Surg Res,2014,100(6):621-624.
[8] Keskin D,Sen H.The comparative evaluation of treatment outcomes in pediatric displaced supracondylar humerus fractures managed with either open or closed reduction and percutaneous pinning[J].Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech,2014,81(6):380-386.
[9] Hussain S,Dhar S,Qayoom A.Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of displaced Supracondylar Fractures of Humerus with Crossed K-wires via Medial Approach[J].J Malays Orthop,2014,8(2):29-34.
[10] Sangkomkamhang T,Singjam U,Leeprakobboon D.Risk factors for loss of fixation in pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures[J].J Med Assoc Thai,2014,97(9):S23-28.
[11] Balakumar B,Madhuri V.A retrospective analysis of loss of reduction in operated supracondylar humerus fractures[J].Indian J Orthop,2012,46(6):690-697.
[12] Lehner M,Schuster B,Dietz HG.Strategies in the treatment of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children- proven and controversial[J].Zentralbl Chir,2014,139(6):613-620.
[13] Georgescu I,Gavriliu S,Parvan A,et al.Burnei's“double X”internal fixation technique for supracondylar humerus fractures in children:indications,technique,advantages and alternative interventions:Study and Research Group in Pediatric Orthopaedics-2012[J].J Med Life,2013,6(2):131-139.
[14] 王钦楠,陈久毅,王培森.手法复位经皮外侧双针治疗小儿肱骨髁上骨折(GartlandⅡ、Ⅲ型)30 例[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2014,22(4):47-48.
[15] Joiner ER,Skaggs DL,Arkader A,et al.Iatrogenic nerve injuries in the treatment of supracondylar humerus fractures:are we really just missing nerve injuries on preoperative examination? [J].J Pediatr Orthop,2014,34(4):388-392.
[16] Dorm an s JP.实用小儿骨科学[M].潘少川,译.2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2007:306-307.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2015-03-10
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-09-15