[1]乔杰,张军△,董晓俊,等.产后骨盆痛患者耻骨联合分离与疼痛的关系初探[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2015,23(01):7-9.
　QIAO Jie,ZHANG Jun,DONG Xiaojun,et al.Relationship of Pubic Symphysis Separation and Pain onPostpartum Pelvic Girdle Pain Patients[J].Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics,2015,23(01):7-9.
点击复制

产后骨盆痛患者耻骨联合分离与疼痛的关系初探
分享到：

《中国中医骨伤科杂志》[ISSN:1005-0205/CN:42-1340/R]

卷:
第23卷
期数:
2015年01期
页码:
7-9
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2015-01-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Relationship of Pubic Symphysis Separation and Pain onPostpartum Pelvic Girdle Pain Patients
文章编号:
1005-0205(2015)01-0007-03
作者:
乔杰1; 张军2△; 董晓俊1; 张慧2; 刘强2;
1.武汉市中医医院骨伤科(武汉,430014)
2. 中国中医科学院望京医院
△.通讯作者 E-mail:Zhangjunmd@163.com
Author(s):
QIAO Jie1; ZHANG Jun2; DONG Xiaojun1; ZHANG Hui2; LIU Qiang2;
1.Department of Orthopaedics, Wuhan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wuhan 430014, China
2. Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Traditional Chinese Medical Science, Beijing 100700, china
关键词:
产后骨盆痛;  耻骨联合;  疼痛;  相关性
Keywords:
postpartum pelvic girdle pain;  pubic symphysis;  pain;  relationship
分类号:
R681.6
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:初步探讨产后骨盆痛患者耻骨联合分离间距与疼痛程度之间的关系。方法:回顾性分析32例产后骨盆痛患者临床资料,以初诊时骨盆正位X线平片耻骨联合间距分为A组(6 mm≤间距<12 mm,11人)、B组(12 mm≤间距<20 mm,15人)、C组(20≤间距<30 mm,8人)。比较3组患者初诊时一般情况和疼痛视觉模拟评分(Visual Analogue Scale,VAS),并观察2月后复诊时耻骨联合间距与VAS的变化。结果:初诊时3组VAS组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05); 与初诊时相比复诊时3组VAS均明显降低(P<0.05); C组耻骨联合间距较前减小(P<0.05),A组、B组耻骨联合间距较前均无显著改变(P>0.05)。结论:产后骨盆痛患者耻骨联合分离间距与疼痛程度无明显一致性。
Abstract:
Objective: To investigate the relationship of Pubic symphysis separation and the degree of pain on Postpartum Pelvic Girdle Pain patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 32 patients with Postpartum Pelvic Girdle Pain(PPGP). All patients were divided into three groups according to pubic symphysis separation, group A(6～11mm), group B(12～20mm), group C(21～30mm). Compared the general condition and visual analogue scale(VAS)in the 3 groups at first hospitalization as well as changes in separation distance and VAS of the pubic symphysis after two months. Results: VAS showed no significant difference among the three groups at the first visit(P>0.05).VAS of three groups were all significantly lower than that at the first visit(P<0.05). The pubic symphysis separation of group C was lower than that at the first visit(P<0.05)and there was no significantly difference between group A and group B(P>0.05). Conclusion: There was no obvious relationship between pubic symphysis separation and the degree of pain feeling in postpartum pelvic pain patients.

参考文献/References:

[1] WU W H, MEIJER O G, UEGAKI K, et al. Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain(PPP), I: terminology, clinical presentation, and prevalence[J]. Eur Spine, 2004, 13(7):575-589.
[2] WILLIAMS P R, THOMSD D P, DOWNES E M. Osteitis pubis and instability of the pubic symphysis: when nonoperative measures fail[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2000, 28(3):350-355.
[3] GARRAS D N, CAROTHERS J T, OLSON S A. Single-leg-stance(flamingo)radiographs to assess pelvic instability: how much motion is normal [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2008, 90(10):2114-2118.
[4] VLEEMING A, ALBERT H B, OSTGAARD H C, et al. European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle pain[J]. EurSpine,2008, 17(6):794-819.
[5] 胡春洪,崔磊.脊柱四肢影像图解[M].北京:人民军医出本社,2012.5:290.
[6] 孙树椿.清宫正骨手法图谱[M].北京:中国中医药出版社,2012,9:119.
[7] LEADBETTER R E, MAWER D, LINDOW S W. The development of a scoring system for symphysis pubis dysfunction[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol,2006, 26(1):20-23.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2014-09-01
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-02-20