[1]林栋栋,彭力平,马笃军,等.消瘀散与双柏散治疗急性软组织损伤疗效比较的实验研究[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2015,23(01):1-3.
　LIN Dongdong,PENG Liping,MA Dujun,et al.Efficacy of Xiaoyu Powder Compared with ShuangbaiPowder on Acute Soft Tissue Injury[J].Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics,2015,23(01):1-3.
点击复制

消瘀散与双柏散治疗急性软组织损伤疗效比较的实验研究
分享到：

《中国中医骨伤科杂志》[ISSN:1005-0205/CN:42-1340/R]

卷:
第23卷
期数:
2015年01期
页码:
1-3
栏目:
实验研究
出版日期:
2015-01-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Efficacy of Xiaoyu Powder Compared with ShuangbaiPowder on Acute Soft Tissue Injury
文章编号:
1005-0205(2015)01-0001-03
作者:
林栋栋1; 彭力平2; 马笃军2; 裴军宇1; 江龙凤3; 商晓明3;
1.广州中医药大学(广州,510006)
2.深圳市中医院
3.江西中医药大学
Author(s):
LIN Dongdong1; PENG Liping2; MA Dujun2; PEI Junyu1;JIANG Longfeng3; SHANG Xiaoming3;
1.Guangzhou University of TCM, Guangzhou 510006, China
2.Shenzhen Hospital of TCM, Shenzhen 518033, China
3.Jiangxi University of TCM, Nanchang 330004, China
关键词:
消瘀散;  双柏散;  急性软组织损伤;  实验研究
Keywords:
xiaoyu powder;  shuangbai powder;  acute soft tissue injury;  experimental study
分类号:
R-33
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:观察“消瘀散”、“双柏散”对兔急性软组织损伤的治疗效果。方法:24只家兔行物理打击造模后按完全随机化设计分为A组(消瘀散组)、B组(双柏散组)及C组(空白组),各8只,各组分别用消瘀散膏、双柏散膏、空白贴剂外敷(凡士林),敷药后第3、5天作大体观察评分、光镜下组织病理评分、血液流变检测。评分数据用SPSS 17.0统计软件统计。结果:各时相大体观察评分、第3天光镜下组织病理评分A、B组明显优于C组(P<0.01),A组明显优于B组(P<0.01),第5天光镜下组织病理评分A、B组明显优于C组(P<0.01),A、B组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05); 血液流变显示:第3天各项指标A组明显低于B、C组(P<0.01),除全血粘度(中切)外,B组明显优于C组(P<0.01),用药后第5天纤维蛋白原、全血粘度(中、高切)A组明显低于B组,毛细管血浆粘度A组与B组比较差别有统计学意义(P<0.05),纤维蛋白原、全血粘度(低、中切)B组明显优于C组(P<0.01),全血粘度(高切)、毛细管血浆粘度B组与C组比较有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:“消瘀散”、“双柏散”对急性血瘀证模型(新西兰大白兔)均有较好疗效,两者相比,“消瘀散”比“双柏散”疗效更突出,且显效更快。
Abstract:
Objective: To observe the efficacy of “Xiaoyu powder” compared with “Shuangbai powder” on acute soft tissue injury treatment in rabbits. Methods: All 24 rabbits underwent the physical molding were randomly divided into group A(Xiaoyu powder group, n=8), B group(Shuangbai powder group, n=8)and C group(control group, n=8). The rabbits in group A were treated with Xiaoyu powder ointment, the group B with Shuangbai powder ointment, and the group C with blank patch application(Vaseline). The general observation scores, histopathology scores under light microscope, and blood rheology were involved in the third and the fifth days after the treatment. The statistical evaluation was performed by software SPSS17.0. Results: The histopathology scores in group A and group B were higher than that in group C(P<0.01), while that in group A was higher than group B(P<0.01)in the third day. The histopathology scores in group A and group B were higher than that in group C(P<0.01), while there was no statistical differences in histopathology score between group A and group B(P>0.05)in the fifth day. Each index of blood rheology in group A was lower than that in group B and group C(P<0.01), while the index in group B was higher than that in group C except whole blood viscosity(P< 0.01)in the third day. There were statistical differences in fibrinogen, whole blood viscosity and capillary plasma viscosity between group A and group B(P<0.05), while there were statistical differences between group B and group C(P<0.05)in the fifth day. Conclusion: “Xiaoyu powder” and “Shuangbai powder” are useful on acute blood stasis model(rabbit), and “Xiaoyu powder” is better than “Shuangbai powder”.

参考文献/References:

[1] 卓晓英,罗丽英,龚博慎,等.双柏散外敷治疗急性软组织损伤1681例的临床观察[J].中国现代医学杂志,2006,16(15):2389-2390.
[2] 彭力平,孙德毅,林松青,等.消瘀散外敷治疗急性软组织损伤的实验研究[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2008,16(5):16-18.
[3] 陈美珠,黄霖.急性软组织损伤外敷中药药物厚度的研究[J].中国中医药科技,2005,12(4):246- 247.
[4] 肖立新.消瘀散涂膜剂和即型凝胶剂治疗急性软组织挫伤的实验研究[J].中华中医药学刊,2013,31(1):184-188.
[5] 王和鸣.中医骨伤科学[M].北京:中国中医药出版社,2007:357.
[6] 林松青,彭力平.消瘀散治疗急性软组织损伤的临床疗效研究[J].中医正骨,2009,21(4):10-11.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2014-06-09
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-02-20