[1]韩旭,佟云,廖颖翀,等.纱条辅助复位法治疗指(趾)骨骨折140例[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2025,33(05):77-79+84.[doi:10.20085/j.cnki.issn1005-0205.250516]
　HAN Xu,TONG Yun,LIAO Yingchong,et al.Efficacy Observation of Medical Gauze Strip-Assisted Reduction in the Treatment of 140 Cases of Phalangeal Fractures[J].Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics,2025,33(05):77-79+84.[doi:10.20085/j.cnki.issn1005-0205.250516]
点击复制

纱条辅助复位法治疗指(趾)骨骨折140例()
分享到：

《中国中医骨伤科杂志》[ISSN:1005-0205/CN:42-1340/R]

卷:
第33卷
期数:
2025年05期
页码:
77-79+84
栏目:
临床报道
出版日期:
2025-05-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Efficacy Observation of Medical Gauze Strip-Assisted Reduction in the Treatment of 140 Cases of Phalangeal Fractures
文章编号:
1005-0205(2025)05-0077-03
作者:
韩旭1; 佟云1; 廖颖翀1; 李兆合1; 王晨曦1; 张海群1; 张伟1
1北京市丰盛中医骨伤专科医院(北京,100033)
Author(s):
HAN Xu1; TONG Yun1; LIAO Yingchong1; LI Zhaohe1; WANG Chenxi1; ZHANG Haiqun1; ZHANG Wei1
1Beijing Fengsheng Special Hospital of Traditional Medical Traumatology and Orthopaedics,Beijing 100033,China.
关键词:
指骨骨折;  趾骨骨折;  短管状骨;  纱条辅助复位
Keywords:
finger phalangeal fracture;  toe phalanx fracture;  short tubular bone;  medical gauze strip-assisted reduction method
分类号:
R683.42
DOI:
10.20085/j.cnki.issn1005-0205.250516
文献标志码:
B
摘要:
目的:比较纱条辅助复位法治疗指(趾)骨骨折相比传统复位手法治疗的效果。方法:选取2022-2024年间共计140例指(趾)骨骨折患者,随机分组后分别采用纱条辅助复位法和传统整复手法两种复位方式进行治疗,根据复位效果及拆除夹板后进行的3次关节功能评价,经统计学分析得出结论。结果:纱条辅助复位法复位效果优良率为94.4%,明显优于传统整复手法。功能方面,纱条辅助复位法拆除夹板后即刻优良率为68.0%,1个月后优良率为88.9%,均优于传统整复手法治疗组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2个月后纱条辅助复位法优良率为93.4%,与传统整复手法组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:采用纱条辅助复位法对指(趾)骨骨折进行复位,复位效果明显优于传统整复手法,短期疗效存在明显差异,长期疗效无明显差异。
Abstract:
Objective:This study aim to compare the therapeutic efficacy of the medical gauze strip-assisted reduction method with that of the traditional fracture reduction technique in the treatment of phalangeal fractures.Methods:140 cases diagnosed with phalangeal fractures were enrolled in this study between 2022 and 2024.Participants were randomly allocated into two groups,each receiving one of the two reduction methods(medical gauze strip-assisted reduction method and traditional fracture reduction technique).Statistical analysis was conducted based on the fracture reduction outcomes and the joint function assessments performed at three time points following splint removal,with conclusions subsequently drawn.Results:The excellent-to-good rate of reduction efficacy for the medical gauze strip-assisted reduction method was 94.4%,which was significantly superior to that of the traditional fracture reduction technique.Regarding functional performance,the excellent-to-good rate was 68.0% immediately after splint removal and 88.9% at 1 month post-removal,both of which were significantly higher than those in the traditional fracture reduction technique group.At 2 months post-treatment,the excellent-to-good rate for the medical gauze strip-assisted reduction method was 93.4%,showing no significant difference compared to the traditional fracture reduction technique group.Conclusion:The medical gauze strip-assisted reduction method demonstrated significantly superior efficacy in the reduction of phalangeal fractures compared to the traditional fracture reduction technique.Significant differences were observed between both treatment methods in terms of short-term efficacy,whereas no significant differences were noted in long-term outcomes.

参考文献/References:

[1] SILINS K,TURKMEN T,VÖGELIN Z,et al.Comparing treatment of proximal phalangeal fractures with intramedullary screws versus plating[J].Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery,2023,143(3):1699-1706.
[2] MOURA S P,MEULENDIJKS M Z,VEERAMANI A,et al.Epidemiology and fracture patterns of traumatic phalangeal fractures[J].Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery-Global Open,2022,10(8):e4455.
[3] SIVAKUMAR B S,AN V V G,SYMES M J,et al.Temporal trends in the management of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures in the 21st century:an analysis of Australian population-based data[J].ANZ Journal of Surgery,2022,92(10):2655-2660.
[4] 韩旭,佟云,张海群,等.纱条辅助复位硬纸夹板外固定法治疗中近节指骨骨折67例[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2020,28(5):70-72.
[5] 任蒙强,曲怡,王友仁.按动疗法初探[J].北京中医药,2010,29(1):36-38.
[6] 中华医学会手外科学会.中华医学会手外科学会上肢部分功能评定试用标准[J].中华手外科杂志,2000,16(3):130-135.
[7] KITAOKA H B,ALEXANDER I J,ADELAAR R S,et al.Clinical rating systems for the ankle:hindfoot,midfoot,hallux,and lesser toes[J].Foot Ankle Int,1994,15(7):349-353.
[8] 黄为,陈锋,杨雄升,等.微型钢板内固定与克氏针内固定治疗掌指骨骨折的Meta分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2022,37(1):32-35.
[9] 卢承印,张海龙,张来福,等.3种手术方法治疗闭合性指骨骨折的疗效比较[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2021,36(9):988-990.
[10] 王金锋,袁金凤,杜宏伟,等.指骨基底髁角的临床意义[J].实用手外科杂志,2018,32(1):80-81.
[11] 李强.中医正骨手法复位经皮穿针内固定治疗拇指近节指骨骨折的临床疗效[J].内蒙古中医药,2019,38(8):126-127.
[12] 智照林,李兵,王钲,等.按动推拿流派手法治疗筋伤的经验特色[J].中国医药导报,2022,19(2):143-147.
[13] 王培洋.粉碎性指骨骨折患者内固定治疗后手指功能恢复的影响因素[J].数理医药学杂志,2022,35(2):194-196.
[14] 刘秉锐,王伟,王磊,等.矩形微型钢板内固定治疗近节指骨中远段骨折的疗效分析[J].局解手术学杂志,2020,29(3):220-223.
[15] 朱志立.闭合复位与切开复位治疗中节指骨骨折患者的疗效[J].医疗装备,2016,29(23):44-45.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:2023年北京市西城区优秀人才培养资助项目-骨干个人(2023-XCRC-区委卫生健康工委202307)
更新日期/Last Update: 2025-05-15