[1]付豪,赵刚△,尚利杰,等.单孔分体内镜下腰椎间盘髓核切除术治疗单节段腰椎间盘突出症33例[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2025,33(01):78-83.[doi:10.20085/j.cnki.issn1005-0205.250117]
　FU Hao,ZHAO Gang,SHANG Lijie,et al.Single-Segment Lumbar Disc Herniation Treated with One-Hole Split Endoscope Technique:33 Cases Report[J].Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics,2025,33(01):78-83.[doi:10.20085/j.cnki.issn1005-0205.250117]
点击复制

单孔分体内镜下腰椎间盘髓核切除术治疗单节段腰椎间盘突出症33例()
分享到：

《中国中医骨伤科杂志》[ISSN:1005-0205/CN:42-1340/R]

卷:
第33卷
期数:
2025年01期
页码:
78-83
栏目:
临床报道
出版日期:
2025-01-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Single-Segment Lumbar Disc Herniation Treated with One-Hole Split Endoscope Technique:33 Cases Report
文章编号:
1005-0205(2025)01-0078-06
作者:
付豪1; 2; 赵刚2△; 尚利杰2; 常青2; 林旭鑫3; 栗林2; 王怡帆2; 周鹭凡2
1河南中医药大学研究生院(郑州,450046)
2河南省洛阳正骨医院(河南省骨科医院)
3湖南中医药大学研究生院
Author(s):
FU Hao1; 2; ZHAO Gang2△; SHANG Lijie2; CHANG Qing2; LIN Xuxin3; LI Lin2; WANG Yifan2; ZHOU Lufan2
1Graduate School of Henan University of Chinese Medicine,Zhengzhou 450046,China; 2Luoyang Orthopaedic-Traumatological Hospital of Henan Province(Henan Provincial Orthopaedic Hospital),Luoyang 471002,Henan China; 3Graduate School of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine,Changsha 410208,China.
关键词:
单孔分体内镜;  单节段;  腰椎间盘突出症;  髓核切除术
Keywords:
one-hole split endoscope;  single-segment;  lumbar disc herniation;  nucleotomy
分类号:
R681.5
DOI:
10.20085/j.cnki.issn1005-0205.250117
文献标志码:
B
摘要:
目的:回顾性分析应用单孔分体内镜(OSE)下腰椎间盘髓核切除术治疗单节段腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)的有效性及安全性。方法:2022年6月至2023年12月,33例患者因单节段腰椎间盘突出症接受在单孔分体内镜下腰椎间盘髓核切除术治疗。其中男18 例,女15例; 年龄为33～58岁,平均为(45.24±7.73)岁; 体重指数为(24.25±1.66)kg/m2。椎间盘突出责任节段:L3/4 节段5 例,L4/5 节段15 例,L5S1节段13例。记录切口长度、手术时间,统计所有患者手术前和术后3个月腰椎动力位X线片手术节段矢状面动力移位距离(ST)和活动度(ROM)。对所有患者术前、术后2 d、3个月及6个月采用疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分,日本骨科协会(JOA)评分进行评价,以评估其腰腿痛及腰椎功能恢复程度,术后随访6个月,采用改良MacNab标准评估临床疗效。结果:所有患者均顺利完成手术,切口长度平均为1.99 cm,手术时间平均为76.97 min。所有患者均完成至少半年随访,随访结果显示:术后3个月手术节段矢状面动力移位距离和活动度与术前比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后各时间节点患者腰腿部VAS评分和JOA评分较术前均有明显改善,各时间节点差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。末次随访时应用改良MacNab标准评估术后6个月临床疗效:优18例(54.55%),良12例(36.36%),可3例(9.09%),差0例,优良率为90.91%。结论:单孔分体内镜下腰椎间盘髓核切除术治疗单节段腰椎间盘突出症具有良好的有效性及安全性,可以作为其他脊柱内镜技术的替代选择,但远期疗效有待进一步研究证实。
Abstract:
Objective:To retrospectively analyze the efficacy and safety of applying one-hole split endoscope(OSE)technique for the treatment of single-segment lumbar disc herniation(LDH).Methods:From June 2022 to December 2023,33 patients underwent lumbar disc nuclectomy with OSE technique for single-segment LDH,of which 18 were male and 15 were female,with ages ranging from 33 to 58 years old,with a mean age of(45.24±7.73)years old,a body mass index(BMI)of(24.25±1.66)kg/m2,and the responsible segments for disc herniation were:L3/4 segment in 5 cases,L4/5 segment in 15 cases,and L5S1 segment in 13 cases.The length of incision and operation time were recorded.The sagittal translation(ST)and range of motion(ROM)of the operated segments on lumbar power radiographs were counted in all patients before and 3 months after surgery.All patients were evaluated preoperatively,2 d after surgery,3 months after surgery,and 6 months after surgery using the visual analogue scale(VAS)score for pain,the Japanese orthopaedic association(JOA)scores to assess their lumbar and leg pain and lumbar spine function.The degree of recovery was evaluated to assess the degree of lumbar leg pain and lumbar spine function,and the modified MacNab criteria were used to assess the clinical efficacy at 6 months postoperatively.Results:All patients had successfully completed the surgery,with an average incision length of 1.99 cm,an average operation time of 76.97 min.All patients had completed at least half a year of follow-up,and the results of the follow-up showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the amount of ST of the operated segments and the ROM of the operated segments at 3 months after the surgery compared with those of the preoperative segments(P>0.05).The patients' VAS scores and JOA scores of the lumbar and leg at each postoperative time point were significantly improved compared with the preoperative ones,and the differences were statistically significant at each time point(P<0.05).At the final follow-up,the modified MacNab criteria were applied to assess the clinical efficacy at 6 months postoperatively:18 cases(54.55%)were obtained as excellent,12 cases(36.36%)as good,3 cases(9.09%)as possible,and 0 case as poor,with an excellent rate of 90.91%.Conclusion:Lumbar disc nucleotomy under OSE technique has good early clinical efficacy in the treatment of single-segment LDH,and can be an alternative choice to other spinal endoscopic techniques,which is worthy of clinical popularization and application,but the long-term efficacy needs to be further confirmed by conducting comparative studies.

参考文献/References:

[1] 张玉红,张民,戴国华,等.单孔分体内镜治疗中重度腰椎管狭窄症的早期临床疗效[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2023,33(1):37-44.
[2] 谭芳,张锋,韩帅,等.单孔分体内镜技术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效分析[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2024,38(3):337-341.
[3] 唐振宇,李亚浩,李子航,等.单孔分体内镜、单侧双通道内镜及经皮内镜椎间孔入路椎间盘切除术治疗游离型腰椎间盘突出症的比较研究[J].中医正骨,2024,36(6):23-31.
[4] 中华医学会骨科学分会脊柱外科学组,中华医学会骨科学分会骨科康复学组.腰椎间盘突出症诊疗指南[J].中华骨科杂志,2020,40(8):477-487.
[5] 中国康复医学会脊柱脊髓专业委员会基础研究与转化学组.腰椎间盘突出症诊治与康复管理指南[J].中华外科杂志,2022,60(5):401-408.
[6] DUPUIS P R,YONG-HINK K,CASSIDY J D,et al.Radiologic diagnosis of degenerative lumbar spinal instability[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),1985,10(3):262-276.
[7] LU Z,DING A,YU Q,et al.Effect of the preoperative assessment of the anteroposterior diameters of the spinal canal and dural area on the efficacy of oblique lumbar interbody fusion in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis[J].J Orthop Surg Res,2023,18(1):440.
[8] 王洪伟,李长青,周跃.腰椎间盘突出症疼痛发生机制的研究进展[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2011,19(7):568-571.
[9] ERDOGAN U.The results of using a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage at the upper lumbar level[J].Cureus,2021,13(6):e15496.
[10] NISHIKAWA H,FUJIMOTO M,TANIOKA S,et al.Novel transdural epiarachnoid approach for large central disk herniation in upper lumbar spine[J].Oper Neurosurg(Hagerstown),2022,22(1):e58-e61.
[11] HE D,CHENG X,ZHENG S,et al.Unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy versus percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for iumbar disc herniation:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].World Neurosurg,2023,173:e509-e520.
[12] 刘昌震,刘鑫,李岳飞,等.三维重建指导单孔分体内镜治疗上腰椎椎间盘突出症的影像学标志点[J].中国组织工程研究,2024,28(6):939-944.
[13] LI H,JIANG C,MU X,et al.Comparison of MED and PELD in the treatment of adolescent lumbar disc herniation:a 5-year retrospective follow-up[J].World Neurosurg,2018,112:e255-e260.
[14] LI M,YANG H,YANG Q.Full-endoscopic technique discectomy versus microendoscopic discectomy for the surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation[J].Pain Physician,2015,18(4):359-363.
[15] 陈树东,李永津,苏国义,等.基于腰椎间盘突出的不同类型及节段探讨经皮椎间孔镜的术前规划[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2023,31(1):84-88.
[16] LEE S H,KANG H S,CHOI G,et al.Foraminoplastic ventral epidural approach for removal of extruded herniated fragment at the L5S1 level[J].Neurol Med Chir(Tokyo),2010,50(12):1074-1078.
[17] ZHANG Y H,FENG B,HU P,et al.One-hole split endoscopy technique versus unilateral biportal endoscopy technique for L5S1 lumbar disk herniation:analysis of clinical and radiologic outcomes[J].J Orthop Surg Res,2023,18(1):668.
[18] ZHANG Y,FENG B,NING H,et al.One-hole split endoscope technique for migrated lumbar disc herniation:a single-centre,retrospective study of a novel technique[J].J Orthop Surg Res,2023,18(1):483.
[19] 冯志萌,孙宁,孙兆忠,等.影像三维重建安全辅助单孔分体内镜治疗L5S1极外侧腰椎间盘突出症[J].中国组织工程研究,2025,29(9):1876-1882.
[20] LIU C,ZHANG W,WANG C,et al.Comparison of one-hole split endoscopic discectomy and microendoscopic discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disk herniation:a one-year retrospective cohort study[J].J Orthop Surg Res,2024,19(1):123.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
△通信作者 E-mail:13663889866@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2025-01-15