[1]张凤军,周广超,巴昭臣,等.侧卧位直接前方入路与前外侧入路初次单侧全髋关节置换术后患者步态分析[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2024,32(10):54-59.[doi:10.20085/j.cnki.issn1005-0205.241010]
　ZHANG Fengjun,ZHOU Guangchao,BA Zhaochen,et al.Gait Analysis of Patients after Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty with Lateral Decubitus Direct Anterior Approach and Anterolateral Approach[J].Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics,2024,32(10):54-59.[doi:10.20085/j.cnki.issn1005-0205.241010]
点击复制

侧卧位直接前方入路与前外侧入路初次单侧全髋关节置换术后患者步态分析()
分享到：

《中国中医骨伤科杂志》[ISSN:1005-0205/CN:42-1340/R]

卷:
第32卷
期数:
2024年10期
页码:
54-59
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2024-10-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Gait Analysis of Patients after Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty with Lateral Decubitus Direct Anterior Approach and Anterolateral Approach
文章编号:
1005-0205(2024)10-0054-06
作者:
张凤军1; 周广超2; 巴昭臣1; 李凯1; 张殿治1; 王合强1; 宋志萍1
1滨州市第二人民医院(山东 滨州,256800)
2东营市中医院
Author(s):
ZHANG Fengjun1; ZHOU Guangchao2 ; BA Zhaochen1; LI Kai1; ZHANG Dianzhi1 ; WANG Heqiang1; SONG Zhiping1
1Binzhou City Second People's Hospital,Binzhou 256800,Shandong China; 2Dongying Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Dongying 257055,Shandong China.
关键词:
侧卧位;  直接前方入路;  前外侧入路;  全髋关节置换术;  步态分析;  股骨头坏死
Keywords:
lateral decubitus position;  direct anterior approach;  anterolateral approach;  total hip arthroplasty;  femoral head necrosis;  gait analysis;  femoral head necrosis
分类号:
R687.4
DOI:
10.20085/j.cnki.issn1005-0205.241010
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:通过步态分析技术比较侧卧位直接前方入路(DAA)和前外侧入路(ALA)初次单侧全髋关节置换术后患者步态变化,以探讨两种不同路径术后患者步态恢复效果的差异。方法:根据纳入标准及排除标准选择患者120例,所有患者均于2020年4月至2022年11月就诊,两种不同入路髋关节置换手术由同一医师完成。采用随机数字表法根据手术入路不同分为直接前方入路组(60例)和前外侧入路组(60例),比较两组患者手术时间、切口长度、出血量、视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、Harris髋关节功能评分,并应用步态分析技术比较两组患者术前及术后1 d、3 d、2个月、4个月的步频、步速、跨步长及术侧支撑相。结果:直接前方入路组患者比前外侧入路组手术时间短,切口长度短,出血量少,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05); 直接前方入路组患者在术后1 d、3 d、2个月VAS评分明显低于前外侧入路组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05); 直接前方入路组患者在术后1 d、3 d、2个月Harris评分高于前外侧入路组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后3 d直接前方入路组患者和前外侧入路组患者与术前相比,患者的步频、步速、跨步长及术侧支撑相均有明显恢复,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后3 d和2个月直接前方入路组患者与前外侧入路组患者的步频、步速、跨步长及术侧支撑相比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),术后4个月直接前方入路组患者与前外侧入路组患者的步频、步速、跨步长及术侧支撑相比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:直接前方入路和前外侧入路初次单侧全髋关节置换术后均可明显改善患者的步态,直接前方入路术后患者步态恢复更快。
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the gait changes of patients after primary unilateral total hip arthroplasty(THA)with lateral decubitus direct anterior approach(DAA)and anterolateral approach(ALA)by gait analysis technique,in order to explore the difference of postoperative rehabilitation effect between the two approaches.Methods:A total of 120 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected.All the patients were admitted from April 2020 to November 2022.The hip replacement with two different approaches was performed by the same physician.According to different surgical approaches,patients were divided into DAA group(60 cases)and ALA group(60 cases)by random number table method.Operation time,incision length,blood loss,visual analogue scale(VAS)score and Harris hip function score were compared between the two groups.Gait frequency,stride speed,stride length and intraoperative support phase were compared between the two groups before operation and 3 d,2 months and 4 months after operation.Results:Compared with ALA group,DAA group had shorter operation time,shorter incision length and less blood loss(P<0.05).VAS scores of DAA group,1 d,3 d and 2 months after surgery were significantly lower than those of ALA group(P<0.05).Harris scores of DAA group,1 d,3 d and 2 months after surgery were higher than those of ALA group(P<0.05).Intra-group comparison,step frequency,step speed,stride length and intraoperative support phase of patients in DAA group and ALA group were significantly recovered 3 d after surgery compared with that before surgery(P<0.05).There were statistically significant differences in step frequency,step speed,stride length and intraoperative support between DAA group and ALA group 3 d and 2 months after surgery(P<0.05),while there were no statistically significant differences in step frequency,step speed,stride length and intraoperative support between DAA group and ALA group 4 months after surgery(P>0.05).Conclusion:Both the direct anterior approach and the anterolateral approach improved gait significantly after primary unilateral total hip arthroplasty,and gait recovery was faster with the direct anterior approach.

参考文献/References:

[1] 袁强,张颖,林继红,等.股骨头坏死硬化带分型与骨髓水肿及疼痛程度的相关性分析[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2023,31(1):40-45.
[2] 马剑雄,何伟伟,赵杰,等.股骨头坏死发病机制研究的最新进展[J].中国组织工程研究,2017,21(27):4397-4402.
[3] 陈坤,李奇.前外侧入路微创全髋关节置换术的研究进展[J].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2020,14(5):608-611.
[4] LANGLOIS J,DELAMBRE J,KLOUCHE S,et al.Direct anterior Hueter approach is a safe and effective approach to perform a bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture:outcome in 82 patients[J].Acta Orthop,2015,86(3):358-362.
[5] 王冲,张梅莹,周健,等.直接前方与后外侧入路进行全髋关节置换患者早期的步态变化[J].中国组织工程研究,2022,26(3):359-364.
[6] MCCRORY J L,WHITE S C,LIFESO R M.Vertical ground reaction forces:objective measures of gait following hip arthroplasty[J].Gait Posture,2001,14(2):104-109.
[7] WINTHER S B,FOSS O A,HUSBY O S,et al.Muscular strength and function after total hip arthroplasty performed with three different surgical approaches:one-year follow-up study[J].HIP International,2019,29(4):405-411.
[8] 中国微循环学会骨微循环专业委员会.股骨头坏死临床诊疗技术专家共识(2022年)[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2022,36(11):1319-1326.
[9] CICHOS K H,MABRY S E,SPITLER C A,et al.Comparison between the direct anterior and posterior approaches for total hip arthroplasty performed for femoral neck fracture[J].Orthop Trauma,2021,35(1):41-48.
[10] PALIERI G,VETRANO M,MANGONE M,et al.Surgical access and damage extent after total hip arthroplasty influence early gait pattern and guide rehabilitation treatment[J].Eur Phys Rehabil Med,2011,47(1):9-17.
[11] WESSELING M,MEYER C,CORTEN K,et al.Does surgical approach or prosthesis type affect hip joint loading one year after surgery?[J].Gait Posture,2016,44:74-82.
[12] QUEEN R M,APPLETON J S,BUTLER R J,et al.Total hip arthroplasty surgical approach does not alter postoperative gait mechanics one year after surgery[J].PM & R,2014,6(3):221-226.
[13] MENEGHINI R M,PAGNANO M W,TROUSDALE R T,et al.Muscle damage during MIS total hip arthroplasty:Smith-Petersen versus posterior approach[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,2006,453:293-298.
[14] YOO J I,CHA Y H,KIM K J,et al.Gait analysis after total hip arthroplasty using direct anterior approach versus anterolateral approach:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders,2019,20(1):63.
[15] BUCS G,DANDÉ Á,PATCZAI B,et al.Bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures with minimally invasive anterior approach in elderly[J].Injury,2021,52(Suppl 1):S37-S43.
[16] 马明阳,宋平,孔祥朋,等.直接前方入路全髋关节置换术股骨侧并发症及治疗研究进展[J].中华骨与关节外科杂志,2022,15(3):221-227.
[17] HUANG X T,LIU D G,JIA B,et al.Comparisons between direct anterior approach and lateral approach for primary total hip arthroplasty in postoperative orthopaedic complications:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Orthopaedic Surgery,2021,13(6):1707-1720.

更新日期/Last Update: 2024-10-05