[1]张栋 杨欢 鲁齐林.靶点射频消融联合神经阻滞治疗高龄患者退行性腰椎管狭窄症的疗效观察[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2024,32(09):83-85.[doi:10.20085/j.cnki.issn1005-0205.240917]
　ZHANG Dong,YANG Huan,LU Qilin.Efficacy Observation of Target Radiofrequency Ablation Combined with Nerve Block in the Treatment of Elderly Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis[J].Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics,2024,32(09):83-85.[doi:10.20085/j.cnki.issn1005-0205.240917]
点击复制

靶点射频消融联合神经阻滞治疗高龄患者退行性腰椎管狭窄症的疗效观察()
分享到：

《中国中医骨伤科杂志》[ISSN:1005-0205/CN:42-1340/R]

卷:
第32卷
期数:
2024年09期
页码:
83-85
栏目:
临床报道
出版日期:
2024-09-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Efficacy Observation of Target Radiofrequency Ablation Combined with Nerve Block in the Treatment of Elderly Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
文章编号:
1005-0205(2024)09-0083-03
作者:
张栋 杨欢 鲁齐林
1武汉市中医医院(武汉,430014)
2武汉中西医结合骨科医院(武汉体育学院附属医院)
Author(s):
ZHANG Dong1; YANG Huan1; LU Qilin2△
1Wuhan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Wuhan 430014,China;
2Wuhan Orthopaedics Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine(Affiliated Hospital of Wuhan Sports University),Wuhan 430079,China.
关键词:
退行性腰椎管狭窄症;  靶点射频消融;  神经阻滞;  高龄患者
Keywords:
degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis;  target radiofrequency ablation;  nerve block;  elderly patients
分类号:
R681.5
DOI:
10.20085/j.cnki.issn1005-0205.240917
文献标志码:
B
摘要:
目的:探讨靶点射频消融联合神经阻滞治疗高龄患者退行性腰椎管狭窄症的临床效果。方法:回顾性分析2020年7月至2023年1月采用靶点射频消融联合神经阻滞治疗的 19例高龄患者退行性腰椎管狭窄症。结果:本组手术时间为15～36 min,平均为20 min。无穿刺伤口感染、神经根损伤及椎管内出血等并发症。术前腰痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分为0～5分,平均为1.2分; 下肢痛VAS评分为5～9分,平均为7.6分。术后即刻腰痛VAS评分为0～3分,平均为0.5分; 下肢痛VAS评分为2～5分,平均为3.1分。术后3个月腰痛VAS评分为0～3分,平均为1分; 下肢痛VAS评分为2～6分,平均为3.8分。19例均获随访,随访时间为3～7个月,平均为4.2个月。术后3个月采用改良MacNab疗效评定标准评价结果:优11例,良6例,可1例,差1例,优良率为89.47%。评定为可、差的2例患者最终接受椎间孔镜治疗,症状缓解。结论:靶点射频消融联合神经阻滞治疗高龄患者退行性腰椎管狭窄症,具有创伤小、近期疗效满意等优点。
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of target radiofrequency ablation combined with nerve block in the treatment of elderly degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.Methods:From July 2020 to January 2023,19 elderly patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis who were treated with target radiofrequency ablation combined with nerve block were retrospectively analyzed.Results:The operation time was 1536 min,with an average of 20 min.There were no complications such as puncture wound infection,nerve root injury and intramural bleeding.Preoperative visual analogue scale(VAS)scores of low back pain were 05 points,with an average of 1.2 points,and VAS score of lower extremity pain was 59 points,with an average of 7.6 points.The VAS scores of immediate postoperative low back pain were 03 points,with an average of 0.5 points,and the VAS scores of lower extremity pain were 25 points,with an average of 3.1 points.Three months after surgery,the VAS scores of low back pain were 03 points,with an average of 1 points,and the VAS scores of lower extremity pain were 26 points,with an average of 3.8 points.All 19 cases were followed up from 3 to 7 months,with an average of 4.2 months.Three months after operation,the modified MacNab efficacy evaluation criteria were adopted:excellent 11 cases,good 6 cases,fair 1 case,poor 1 case,the excellent and good rate of 89.47%.Two patients rated fair or poor were eventually treated with foraminoscopy and their symptoms were relieved.Conclu- sion:Target radiofrequency ablation combined with nerve block in the treatment of elderly degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis has the advantages of less trauma and satisfactory short-term efficacy.

参考文献/References:

[1] 张栋,王艺苑,鲁齐林,等.选择性神经根阻滞联合椎间孔镜治疗老年退行性腰椎管狭窄症的疗效观察[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2017,32(11):1189-1190.
[2] 张栋,王艺苑,鲁齐林,等.选择性神经根阻滞联合分次椎间孔镜手术治疗双节段退行性腰椎管狭窄症[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2018,33(5):505-507.
[3] 鲁齐林,张栋,唐谨,等.侧后路经皮椎间孔镜手术治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症并发症原因分析及预防措施[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2020,35(1):72-74.
[4] SHARPS L S,ISAAC Z.Percutaneous disc decompression using nucleoplasty[J].Pain Physician,2002,5(2):121-126.
[5] MANCHIKANTI L,DERBY R,BENYAMIN R M,et al.A systematic review of mechanical lumbar disc decompression with nucleoplasty[J].Pain Physician,2009,12(3):561-572.
[6] WULLEMS J A,HALIM W,VAN DER WEEGEN W.Current evidence of percutaneous nucleoplasty for the cervical herniated disk:a systematic review[J].Pain Pract,2014,14(6):559-569.
[7] GERGES F J,LIPSITZ S R,NEDELJKOVIC S S.A systematic review on the effectiveness of the nucleoplasty procedure for discogenic pain[J].Pain Physician,2010,13(2):117-132.
[8] KVARSTEIN G,MÅWE L,INDAHL A,et al.A randomized double-blind controlled trial of intra-annular radiofrequency thermal disc therapy:a 12-month follow-up[J].Pain,2009,145(3):279-286.
[9] BHAGIA S M,SLIPMAN C W,NIRSCHL M,et al.Side effects and complications after percutaneous disc decompression using coblation technology[J].Am J Phys Med Rehabil,2006,85(1):6-13.
[10] SMUCK M,BENNY B,HAN A,et al.Epidural fibrosis following percutaneous disc decompression with coblation technology[J].Pain Physician,2007,10(5):691-696.
[11] SUN D,LI Q,TANG Y,et al.Comparison of coblation annuloplasty and radiofrequency thermocoagulation for treatment of lumbar discogenic pain[J].Medicine(Baltimore),2017,96(47):e8538.
[12] YAN D,LI J,ZHU H,et al.Percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty and percutaneous cervical discectomy treatments of the contained cervical disc herniation[J].Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2010,130(11):1371-1376.
[13] KIM J Y,KIM I S,HONG J T,et al.Inferior thyroid arterial injury after percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty[J].Spine J,2015,15(6):1495-1496.
[14] LEE S J,CHOI E J,NAHM F S.Spondylodiscitis after cervical nucleoplasty without any abnormal laboratory findings[J].Korean J Pain,2013,26(2):181-185.
[15] CUELLAR V G,CUELLAR J M,VACCARO A R,et al.Accelerated degeneration after failed cervical and lumbar nucleoplasty[J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2010,23(8):521-524.
[16] KLESSINGER S.The frequency of re-surgery after cervical disc nucleoplasty[J].World Neurosurg,2018,117:e552-e556.
[17] KLESSINGER S.The frequency of re-surgery after lumbar disc nucleoplasty in a ten-year period[J].Clin Neurol Neurosurg,2018,170:79-83.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:武汉中西医结合骨科医院院级科研项目(HGY202201)
△通信作者 E-mail:gkluql@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-09-05