[1]张翔,汤国庆△,陈勇.两种零切迹椎间融合器治疗单节段脊髓型颈椎病的疗效比较[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2024,32(08):48-54.[doi:10.20085/j.cnki.issn1005-0205.240810 ]
　ZHANG Xiang,TANG Guoqing,CHEN Yong.Comparison of the Efficacy of Two Zero-Notch Interbody Fusion Devices on the Treatment of Single-Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy[J].Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics,2024,32(08):48-54.[doi:10.20085/j.cnki.issn1005-0205.240810 ]
点击复制

两种零切迹椎间融合器治疗单节段脊髓型颈椎病的疗效比较()
分享到：

《中国中医骨伤科杂志》[ISSN:1005-0205/CN:42-1340/R]

卷:
第32卷
期数:
2024年08期
页码:
48-54
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2024-08-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of the Efficacy of Two Zero-Notch Interbody Fusion Devices on the Treatment of Single-Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
文章编号:
1005-0205(2024)08-0048-07
作者:
张翔1; 2; 汤国庆1; 2△; 陈勇1; 2
1昆山市中医医院(江苏 昆山,215300)；2江苏省中医临床研究院昆山分院
Author(s):
ZHANG Xiang1; 2; TANG Guoqing1; 2△; CHEN Yong1; 2
1Kunshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Kunshan 215300,Jiangsu China; 2Kunshan Branch of Jiangsu Clinical Research Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Kunshan 215300,Jiangsu China.
关键词:
脊髓型颈椎病;  颈椎前路减压融合内固定术;  颈椎融合
Keywords:
cervical spondylotic myelopathy;  anterior cervical decompression and internal fixation(ACDF);  cervical fusion
分类号:
R681.5
DOI:
10.20085/j.cnki.issn1005-0205.240810
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:比较双插片自稳型椎间融合器(ROI-C)和双向螺钉零切迹椎间融合器(Zero-P)在颈椎前路减压融合内固定术(ACDF)中应用的临床效果。方法:对2018年1月至2023年1月收治的65例单节段脊髓型颈椎病患者行颈椎前路减压融合内固定术治疗进行回顾性分析,其中采用ROI-C治疗组35例,采用Zero-P治疗组30例。比较两组患者出血量、手术时间,术前及术后视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、日本骨科协会(JOA)评分、颈椎功能障碍指数(NDI)评分,评估术后吞咽困难情况及椎体融合情况。结果:对于接受单节段颈椎前路减压融合内固定术的65例患者,均进行完整随访1年。对比研究发现在手术时间方面,C3/4及C6/7节段间隙两组对比,ROI-C组手术时间短于Zero-P组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),其余节段手术时间无明显差异。术后两组患者VAS评分和JOA评分均较术前明显改善,两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。ROI-C组术后吞咽困难发生率为1/35,Zero-P组为1/30,两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。末次随访时,根据Bridwell融合评价标准,ROI-C组和Zero-P组患者颈椎目标间隙均融合。结论:两种零切迹椎间融合器治疗单节段脊髓型颈椎病均具有安全性高、临床效果良好、手术操作简单、出血量少、术后吞咽困难发生率低等优势,对于高位或低位椎间隙,ROI-C组优势更明显。
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy of double-insert self-stable interbody fusion cage(ROI-C)and bidirectional zero-profile interbody fusion cage(Zero-P)in anterior cervical decompression and internal fixation(ACDF).Methods:From January 2018 to January 2023,65 patients with single-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy underwent ACDF surgery were retrospectively analyzed.The ROI-C treatment group 35 cases,the Zero-P treatment group 30 cases.The blood loss,operation time,preoperative and postoperative visual analogue scale(VAS),Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA)and neck disability index(NDI)scores were compared between the two groups.Assessment of postoperative dysphagia and assess vertebral fusion.Results:For single segment ACDF surgery,65 patients were performed complete follow-up of 1 year.The comparative study found that the operation time of ROI-C group was significantly shorter than that of Zero-P group at C3/4 and C6/7 segments(P<0.05),and there was no significant difference in the operation time of other segments.Two groups of patients with postoperative VAS scores,JOA scores were obviously improved compared with preoperative,there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05).ROI-C group,the incidence of postoperatie dysphagia at 1/35,Zero-P group is 1/30,there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups.At last follow-up,according to Bridwell fusion evaluation criteria,the target space of cervical spine in ROI-C group and Zero-P group fused.Conclusion:The two zero-profile interbody fusion cages in the treatment of single-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy have the advantages of high safety,good clinical efficacy,simple operation,less bleeding,and low incidence of postoperative dysphagia.For high or low intervertebral space,the advantages of ROI-C group are more obvious.

参考文献/References:

[1] 刘毅,赵志刚,王昕,等.机器人辅助椎弓根钉固定治疗颈椎骨折脱位[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2022,30(21):1941-1946.
[2] 赵伟华,高俊,卞胡伟,等.颈椎前路零切迹椎间融合器与传统钛板联合融合器治疗脊髓型颈椎病的疗效比较[J].皖南医学院学报,2020,39(5):451-454.
[3] 姚高文,余虹,汪卫,等.零切迹椎间融合器治疗单节段颈椎病的疗效[J].临床骨科杂志,2021,24(4):464-467.
[4] 姚晓玲,彭建城,许岳荣,等.可变角度零切迹前路椎间融合内固定系统治疗脊髓型颈椎病:30个月随访[J].中国组织工程研究,2022,26(9):1377-1382.
[5] 彭建城,唐永超,张顺聪,等.颈前路减压零切迹椎间融合器与传统钛板固定融合术后相邻节段退变的比较[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2020,30(5):417-426.
[6] LU Y,FANG Y,SHEN X,et al.Does zero-profile anchored cage accompanied by a higher postoperative subsidence compared with cage-plate construct? A meta-analysis[J].J Orthop Surg Res,2020,15(1):189.
[7] ZHANG X B,YUAN W H,AN J D,et al.Comparison between zero-profile and cage plate devices in the treatment of single-level cervical spondylopathy[J].Br J Neurosurg,2021,6(3):292-300.
[8] 李秋园,孙中仪,田纪伟.颈前路减压融合两种内固定的进展[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2022,30(3):244-247.
[9] HIRABAYASHI K,MIYAKAWA J,SATOMI K,et al.Operative results and postoperative progression of ossification among patients with ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),1981,6(4):354-364.
[10] BAZAZ R,LEE M J,YOO J U.Incidence of dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery:a prospective study[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2002,27(22):2453-2458.
[11] BRIDWELL K H,LENKE L G,MCENERY K W,et al.Anterior fresh frozen allografts in the thoracic and lumbar spine.Do they work if combined with posterior fusion and instrumentation in adult patients with kyphosis or anterior column defects?[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),1995,20(12):1410-1418.
[12] 袁一,李翔宇,刘承鑫,等.不同术式对多节段脊髓型颈椎病患者颈椎矢状位形态的矫形效果[J].脊柱外科杂志,2022,20(5):302-306.
[13] 赵建宇,张佳豪,涂振兴,等.ACDF中Zero-P与钛板治疗脊髓型颈椎病的早期疗效对比[J].华北理工大学学报(医学版),2023,25(3):200-207.
[14] 夏毕成,孙建广,黄世磊,等.零切迹椎间融合器与独立和钛板椎间融合器联合对双节段跳跃型颈椎病的疗效比较[J].中华医学杂志,2022,102(19):1450-1457.
[15] HE S,ZHOU Z,LV N,et al.Comparison of clinical outcomes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with zero-profle anchored spacer ROI-C-fixation and combined intervertebral cage and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion:a retrospective study from a single center[J].Med Sci Monit:Int Med J Exp Clin Res,2021,27:e931050.
[16] VAISHNAV A S,SAVILLE P,MCANANY S,et al.Predictive factors of postoperative dysphagia in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2019,44(7):E400-E407.
[17] WANG Q L,TU Z M,HU P,et al.Long-term results comparing cervical disc arthroplasty to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion:a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J].Orthop Surg,2020,12(1):16-30.
[18] 勾瑞恩,郝少飞,曹珺,等.零切迹颈前路椎间融合系统在颈椎病融合术中的应用[J].中华解剖与临床杂志,2022,27(3):201-205.
[19] CHO H J,HUR J W,LEE J B,et al.Cervical stand-alone polyetheretherketone cage versus zero-profile anchored spacer in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion:minimum 2-year assessment of radiographic and clinical outcome[J].J Korean Neurosurg Soc,2015,58(2):119-124.
[20] 周琰杰,曹春风,张中卒,等.颈前路减压融合ROI-CTM自锁系统治疗退行性颈椎病的Meta分析[J].中国组织工程研究,2025,29(3):617-627.
[21] 王强,李世芸,熊鹰,等.不同颈椎前路椎间融合系统内固定颈椎的生物力学变化[J].中国组织工程研究,2024,28(6):821-826.
[22] LEE Y S,KIM Y B,PARK S W.Does a zero-profile anchored cage offer additional stabilization as anterior cervical plate?[J].Spine,2015,40(10):E563-E570.
[23] 郑圣安,郑丰裕,董武.零切迹自稳型颈椎间融合器在多节段颈椎病颈椎前路减压植骨融合术中的应用效果[J].临床医学研究与实践,2023,8(3):46-49.
[24] 赵继福,万乾,崔文波.零切迹自稳性颈椎融合器治疗颈椎病合并骨质疏松[J].中国骨伤,2021,34(1):68-72.
[25] 陆廷盛,罗春山,欧阳北平,等.椎间撑开高度对颈椎前路融合临床结果的影响[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2021,29(3):207-210.
[26] 关海山,李承罡,史洁,等.前路减压融合术与后路单开门椎管扩大成形术治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病的中期随访研究[J].中华骨科杂志,2019,39(17):1044-1052.
[27] LI Z,ZHAO Y,TANG J,et al.A comparison of a new zero-profile,stand-alone Fidji cervical cage and anterior cervical plate for single and multilevel ACDF:a minimum 2-year follow-up study[J].Eur Spine J,2017,26(4):1129-1139.
[28] RYU W H A,PLATT A,DEUTSCH H.Hybrid decompression and reconstruction technique for cervical spondylotic myelopathy:case series and review of the literature[J].Journal of Spine Surgery,2020,6(1):181-195.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(81802180) 苏州市医疗卫生科技创新医学创新应用研究项目(SKYD2022052) 昆山市社会发展科技项目(KSF202141) △通信作者 E-mail:tgq2002.4@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-08-05