[1]唐浩杰,刘忠瀚,吴官炜,等.连续双节段颈椎前路杂合手术后邻近节段退变的临床观察[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2024,32(07):61-68.[doi:10.20085/j.cnki.issn1005-0205.240711 ]
　TANG Haojie,LIU Zhonghan,WU Guanwei,et al.Clinical Observation on Adjacent Segment Degeneration in Two-Level Anterior Cervical Hybrid Surgery[J].Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics,2024,32(07):61-68.[doi:10.20085/j.cnki.issn1005-0205.240711 ]
点击复制

连续双节段颈椎前路杂合手术后邻近节段退变的临床观察()
分享到：

《中国中医骨伤科杂志》[ISSN:1005-0205/CN:42-1340/R]

卷:
第32卷
期数:
2024年07期
页码:
61-68
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2024-07-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical Observation on Adjacent Segment Degeneration in Two-Level Anterior Cervical Hybrid Surgery
文章编号:
1005-0205(2024)07-0061-08
作者:
唐浩杰1; 2; 刘忠瀚1; 2; 吴官炜1; 2; 赵思浩2; 赵子义2; 柳根哲2; 尹辛成2; 郑皓云2; 陈超2; 李春根2△
1北京中医药大学(北京,100029)
2首都医科大学附属北京中医医院
Author(s):
TANG Haojie1; 2; LIU Zhonghan1; 2; WU Guanwei1; 2; ZHAO Sihao2; ZHAO Ziyi2; LIU Genzhe2; YIN Xincheng2; ZHENG Haoyun2; CHEN Chao2; LI Chungen2△
1Beijing University of Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100029,China; 2Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Capital Medical University,Beijing 100010,China.
关键词:
邻近节段退变;  杂合手术;  颈前路椎间融合术;  人工颈椎间盘置换术;  双节段
Keywords:
adjacent segment degeneration;  hybrid surgery;  anterior cervical discectomy and fusion;  artificial cervical disc replacement;  two-level
分类号:
R681.5
DOI:
10.20085/j.cnki.issn1005-0205.240711
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:观察双节段颈椎前路杂合手术(Hybrid Surgery,HS)术后邻近节段退变(Adjacent Segment Degeneration,ASD)的发生发展。方法:回顾性分析2015年2月至2022年9月行双节段杂合手术的患者49例,根据杂合手术的两种手术方式的相对位置分为颈前路椎间融合术/人工颈椎间盘置换术组(ACDF/ACDR组)和ACDR/ACDF组。术前和末次随访比较两组上下位邻近节段的日本骨科协会(JOA)评分、颈椎生理曲度、颈椎整体活动度(ROM)、颈椎退化程度Rydman分级、颈椎间盘退变Miyazaki分级、邻近节段退变新发率及手术并发症。结果:共纳入ACDF/ACDR组15例,ACDR/ACDF组34例; 男27例,女22例; 年龄为(60.14±15.16)岁; 随访时间为(36.00±12.13)个月。两组患者末次随访的JOA评分显著增加,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后和术前相比,两组患者的颈椎生理曲度和颈椎整体活动度均无显著变化,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。组间比较,两组患者的邻近节段退变新发率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),总体计算两组患者的下位邻近节段退变新发率为36.7%,比上位邻近节段退变新发率22.4%高,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:多数患者在接受杂合手术前已经存在不同程度的邻近节段退变; 杂合手术不同的手术方式选择并不会显著影响术后的症状改善和邻近节段退变的发生发展; 杂合手术后的下位邻近节段退变新发率相比上位邻近节段更高,但无显著差异。
Abstract:
Objective:To observe the occurrence and development of adjacent segment degeneration(ASD)after two-level anterior cervical hybrid surgery(HS).Methods:49 patients who underwent double-segment HS from February 2015 to September 2022 were retrospectively analyzed.According to the relative positions of the two surgical methods of HS,it is divided into ACDF/ACDR group and the ACDR/ACDF group.Japanese orthopedic association(JOA)scores,cervical spine physiological curvature,range of motion(ROM),Rydman classification,Miyazaki classification,new incidence rate of ASD and surgical complications of the upper and lower adjacent segments of the two groups were compared before surgery and at the final follow-up.Results:There were 15 cases in the ACDF/ACDR group and 34 cases in the ACDR/ACDF group,27 males and 22 females,age(60.14±15.16)years,follow-up time(36.00±12.13)months.The JOA scores of the two groups at the last follow-up increased significantly.Compared with preoperative and postoperative,there were no significant changes in the physiological curvature and ROM of the cervical spine in the two groups.Comparing between groups,there was no significant difference in the new incidence rate of ASD between the two groups.The overall new incidence rate of ASD in the lower adjacent segments of the two groups was 36.7%,which was higher than the 22.4% new incidence rate of ASD in the upper adjacent segments,but it was not significantly higher.Conclusion:Most patients already have varying degrees of ASD before undergoing HS,different surgical selection methods for HS will not significantly affect the postoperative symptom improvement and the occurrence and development of ASD.The new rate of ASD in the lower adjacent segments after HS tends to be more than that in the upper adjacent segments,but there is no significant difference.

参考文献/References:

[1] ZHU Q,LI N,DING Y,et al.Incidence of adjacent segment degeneration and its associated risk factors following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion:a meta-analysis[J].World Neurosurgery,2024,183:e153-e172.
[2] WEI L X,CAO P,XU C,et al.Comparison of three anterior techniques in the surgical treatment of three-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy with intramedullary T2-weighted increased signal intensity[J].World Neurosurgery,2019,126:e842-e852.
[3] VIJAYASARADHI M,SASHANKA K,ALUGOLU R.Does the extent of soft tissue dissection and location of screws in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion impact the development of the adjacent segment degeneration? A prospective short term radiological analysis[J].Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences,2024,68(2):195-200.
[4] ZHU D,ZHANG D,LIU B,et al.Can self-locking cages offer the same clinical outcomes as anterior cage-with-plate fixation for 3-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion(ACDF)in mid-term follow-up?[J].Medical Science Monitor:International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research,2019,25:547-557.
[5] ZIGLER J E,GUYER R D,BLUMENTHAL S L,et al.Analysis of re-operations after cervical total disc replacement in a consecutive series of 535 patients receiving the ProDisc-C device[J].European Spine Journal,2020,29(11):2683-2687.
[6] 周世博,赵学千,袁林,等.颈前路椎间盘切除减压融合联合颈椎间盘置换对三节段颈椎病矢状位指标的影响[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2022,30(9):47-52.
[7] 中华外科杂志编辑部.颈椎病的分型、诊断及非手术治疗专家共识(2018)[J].中华外科杂志,2018,56(6):401-402.
[8] GOH G S,SOH R C C,YUE W M,et al.Determination of the patient acceptable symptom state for the Japanese orthopaedic association score in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J].The Spine Journal,2020,20(11):1785-1794.
[9] RYDMAN E,BANKLER S,PONZER S,et al.Quantifying cervical spondylosis:reliability testing of a coherent CT-based scoring system[J].BMC Medical Imaging,2019,19(1):45.
[10] MIYAZAKI M,HONG S W,YOON S H,et al.Kinematic analysis of the relationship between the grade of disc degeneration and motion unit of the cervical spine[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2008,33(2):187-193.
[11] SHRIVER M F,LUBELSKI D,SHARMA A M,et al.Adjacent segment degeneration and disease following cervical arthroplasty:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].The Spine Journal:Official Journal of the North American Spine Society,2016,16(2):168-181.
[12] WANG Z,LUO G,YU H,et al.Comparison of discover cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc diseases:a meta-analysis of prospective,randomized controlled trials[J].Frontiers in Surgery,2023,10:1124423.
[13] TSALIMAS G,EVANGELOPOULOS D S,BENETOS I S,et al.Dysphagia as a postoperative complication of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion[J].Cureus,2022,14(7):e26888.
[14] BERMUDEZ-LEKERIKA P,CRUMP K B,TSERANIDOU S,et al.Immunomodulatory effects of intervertebral disc cells[J].Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology,2022,10:924692.
[15] LI X F,LV Z D,YIN H L,et al.Impact of adjacent pre-existing disc degeneration status on its biomechanics after single-level anterior cervical interbody fusion[J].Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine,2021,209:106355.
[16] ZHANG Y,ZHOU J,GUO X,et al.Biomechanical effect of different graft heights on adjacent segment and graft segment following C4/C5 anterior cervical discectomy and fusion:a finite element analysis[J].Medical Science Monitor:International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research,2019,25:4169-4175.
[17] SONG Y Q,KARASUGI T,CHEUNG K M,et al.Lumbar disc degeneration is linked to a carbohydrate sulfotransferase 3 variant[J].The Journal of Clinical Investigation,2013,123(11):4909-4917.
[18] TOCI G R,CANSECO J A,PATEL P D,et al.The incidence of adjacent segment pathology after cervical disc arthroplasty compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion:a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials[J].World Neurosurgery,2022,160:e537-e548.
[19] YANG X,DONK R,ARTS M P,et al.Prosthesis in anterior cervical herniated disc approach does not prevent radiologic adjacent segment degeneration[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2020,45(15):1024-1029.
[20] NUNLEY P D,KERR E J,CAVANAUGH D A,et al.Adjacent segment pathology after treatment with cervical disc arthroplasty or anterior cervical discectomy and fusion,part 1:radiographic results at 7-year follow-up[J].International Journal of Spine Surgery,2020,14(3):269-277.
[21] KETTLER A,WILKE H J.Review of existing grading systems for cervical or lumbar disc and facet joint degeneration[J].Eur Spine J,2006,15(6):705-718.
[22] CORIC D,NUNLEY P D,GUYER R D,et al.Prospective,randomized,multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty:269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up:clinical article[J].Journal of Neurosurgery Spine,2011,15(4):348-358.
[23] JI G Y,OH C H,SHIN D A,et al.Artificial disk replacement combined with fusion versus 2-level fusion in cervical 2-level disk disease with a 5-year follow-up[J].Clin Spine Surg,2017,30(5):E620-E627.
[24] CHUNG T T,HUENG D Y,LIN S C.Hybrid strategy of two-level cervical artificial disc and intervertebral cage:biomechanical effects on tissues and implants[J].Medicine,2015,94(47):e2048.
[25] CHO B Y,LIM J,SIM H B,et al.Biomechanical analysis of the range of motion after placement of a two-level cervical ProDisc-C versus hybrid construct[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2010,35(19):1769-1776.
[26] FAIZAN A,GOEL V K,BIYANI A,et al.Adjacent level effects of bi level disc replacement,bi level fusion and disc replacement plus fusion in cervical spine:a finite element based study[J].Clinical Biomechanics(Bristol,Avon),2012,27(3):226-233.
[27] ZHANG J,MENG F,DING Y,et al.Comprehensive analysis of hybrid surgery and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in cervical diseases:a meta-analysis[J].Medicine,2020,99(5):e19055.
[28] LIANG W,HAN B,HAI Y,et al.Biomechanical analysis of the reasonable cervical range of motion to prevent non-fusion segmental degeneration after single-level ACDF[J].Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology,2022,10:918032.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:首都临床特色诊疗技术研究及转化应用项目(Z221100007422122)
△通信作者 E-mail:leechungen@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-07-05