[1]胡鹏 李铭雄△ 魏志勇 余添赐 郑琼红.顺行与逆行髓内针治疗股骨中下段骨折的疗效比较[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2017,25(12):17-20.
　HU Peng LI Mingxiong WEI Zhiyong YU Tianci ZHENG Qionghong.Comparison of Antegrade Intramedullary Nailing Versus Retrograde Intramedullary Nailing for the Middle and Distal Femoral Fractures[J].Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics,2017,25(12):17-20.
点击复制

顺行与逆行髓内针治疗股骨中下段骨折的疗效比较()

《中国中医骨伤科杂志》[ISSN:1005-0205/CN:42-1340/R]

卷:
第25卷
期数:
2017年12期
页码:
17-20
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2017-12-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of Antegrade Intramedullary Nailing Versus Retrograde Intramedullary Nailing for the Middle and Distal Femoral Fractures
文章编号:
1005-0205(2017)12-0017-04
作者:
胡鹏1 李铭雄1△ 魏志勇1 余添赐1 郑琼红1
1福建泉州市正骨医院(福建 泉州,362000) △通信作者 E-mail:915291187@qq.com
Author(s):
HU Peng1 LI Mingxiong1△ WEI Zhiyong1 YU Tianci1 ZHENG Qionghong1
1Department of Orthopedics,Orthopedics Hospital of Quanzhou,Quanzhou 362000,China.
关键词:
股骨中下段骨折;  顺行髓内针;  逆行髓内针
Keywords:
Keywords: middle and distal femoral fractures;  antegrade intramedullary nailing;  retrograde intramedullary nailing
分类号:
R683.42
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:比较顺行与逆行髓内针治疗股骨中下段骨折的临床疗效。方法:回顾性分析2012年2月至2016年1月收治且获得随访的56例股骨中下段骨折患者资料,根据髓内针治疗的不同分为两组:顺行组25例,逆行组31例。对比两组骨折愈合、骨折端对位对线情况、髋膝关节功能及相关并发症。结果:56例患者均得到随访,随访时间为12～30个月,平均16个月。两组均有较高的骨折愈合率,两组髋膝关节功能差异无统计学意义,股骨内侧髁疼痛及股骨反弓畸形发生率较高。结论:顺行与逆行髓内针治疗股骨中下段骨折具有同样的临床效果。
Abstract:
Abstract Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of antegrade intramedullary nailing and Retrograde intramedullary nailing for the middle and distal femoral fractures.Methods:The data of 56 patients with middle and distal femoral fractures who had been treated in our department were analyzed retrospectively from February 2012 to January 2016.They were divided into 2 groups according to the different treatment of intramedullary nailing.In the antegrade group,there were 25 patients,while 31 patients in the retrograde group.The bone union,reduction of fracture,function of knee and hip and complications were compared between the two groups.Results:All the patients had been followed up for 12～30 months(meaning 16 months).Both groups had higher fracture healing rates,and the hip joint function had no significant difference in the two groups.There were high incidence in pain of the medial femoral condyle and deformity of backward angulation.Conclusion:Antegrade and retrograde intramedullary nailing have similar clinical effect for middle and distal femoral fractures.

参考文献/References:

[1] Thoresen BO,Alho EA,Stromsoe K,et al.Interlocking intramedullary nailing in femoral shaft fractures.A report of 48 cases[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,1985,67:1313-1320.
[2] Koval KJ,Kummer FJ,Bharam S,et al.Distal femoral fixation:alaboratory comparison of the 95 degrees plate,antegrade and retrograde inserted reamed intramedullary nails[J].J Orthop Trauma,1996,10(6):378-382.
[3] Toluse AM,Asuquo JE,Ikem IC,et al.Comparison of effect ofretrograde and antegrade approaches to interlocking nail fixation of femoraldiaphyseal fractures on ipsilateral hip and knee joint motion[J].West Afr J Med,2014,33(1):21-25.
[4] Yu CK,Singh VA,Mariapan S,et al.Antegrade versus retrograde lockedIntramedullary nailing for femoral fractures:which is better?[J].Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg,2007,33(2):135-140.
[5] Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics.In:Terry Canale S,ed.Fractures of the Lower Extermity[M].10th ed,Vol.3,Chap.51.
[6] Winquist RA,Hansen ST,Clawson DK.Closed intramedullarynailing of femoral fractures[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,1984,66:529-539.
[7] Ma YG,Hu GL,Hu W,et al.Surgical factors contributing to nonunion infemoral shaft fracture following intramedullary nailing[J].Chin J Traumatol,2016,19(2):109-112.
[8] Taitsman LA,Lynch JR,Agel J,et al.Risk factors for femoral nonunion afterfemoral shaft fracture[J].J Trauma,2009,67(6):1389-1392.
[9] Lin SJ,Chen CL,Peng KT,et al.Effect of fragmentary displacement andmorphology in the treatment of comminuted femoral shaft fractures with anintramedullary nail[J].Injury,2014,45(4):752-756.
[10] Ostrum RF,Agarwal A,Lakatos R,et al.Prospective comparison of retrograde and antegrade femoralintramedullary nailing[J].J OrthopTrauma,2000,14(7):496-501.
[11] Daglar B,Gungor E,Delialioglu OM,et al.Comparison of knee function afterantegrade and retrograde intramedullarynailing for diaphyseal femoral fractures:Results of isokinetic evaluation[J].J Orthop Trauma,2009,23(9):640-644.
[12] Khare A,Mehra MM.Retrograde femoral interlocking nail in complex fractures[J].J Orthop Surg,2002,10(1):17-21.
[13] Patterson BM,Routt ML,Benirschke SK,et al.Retrograde nailing offemolshatftractures[J].J Trauma,1995,38:38-43.
[14] Leggon RE,Feldmann DD.Retrograde femoral nailing:a focus on the knee[J].Am J Knee Surg,2001,14(2):109-118.
[15] Ricci WM,Bellabarba C,Evanoff B,et al.Retrograde versus antegrade nailing of femoral shaft fractures[J].J Ortho Trauma,2001,15(3):161-169.
[16] Blacksin MF,Zurlo JV,Levy AS.Internal derangement of the knee afteripsilateral femoral shaft fracture:MR imaging findings[J].Skeletal Radiol,1998,27(8):434-439.
[17] de Campos J,Vangsness CT Jr,Merritt PO,et al.Ipsilateral knee injurywith femoral fracture.Examination under anesthesia and arthroscopicevaluation[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,1994,300:178-182.
[18] Halvorson JJ,Barnett M,Jackson B,et al.Risk of septic knee followingretrograde intramedullary nailing of open and closed femoral shaft fractures[J].J Orthop Surg Res,2012,17(7):7.
[19] Papadokostakis G,Papakostidis C,Dimitriou R,et al.The role and efficacy of retrograding nailing for the treatment of diaphyseal and distalfemoral fractures:a systematic review of the literature[J].Injury,2005,36(7):813-822.

更新日期/Last Update: 2017-12-08