[1]虞杰 龙亨国 熊小春.经皮加压钢板、动力髋螺钉、空心螺钉治疗移位型股骨颈骨折的临床观察[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2017,25(10):23-27.
　YU Jie LONG Hengguo XIONG Xiaochun.Clinical Comparison of Percutaneous Compression Plate, Dynamic Hip Screw and Canulated Screw in Treatment of Displaced Femoral Neck Fracture[J].Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics,2017,25(10):23-27.
点击复制

经皮加压钢板、动力髋螺钉、空心螺钉治疗移位型股骨颈骨折的临床观察()
分享到：

《中国中医骨伤科杂志》[ISSN:1005-0205/CN:42-1340/R]

卷:
第25卷
期数:
2017年10期
页码:
23-27
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2017-10-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical Comparison of Percutaneous Compression Plate, Dynamic Hip Screw and Canulated Screw in Treatment of Displaced Femoral Neck Fracture
文章编号:
1005-0205(2017)10-0023-05
作者:
虞杰1 龙亨国1 熊小春1
1浙江舟山市中医院脊柱科(浙江 舟山,316000)
Author(s):
YU Jie1 LONG Hengguo1 XIONG Xiaochun1
1Department of Spinal Surgery,Zhoushan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Zhoushan 316000,Zhejiang China.
关键词:
经皮加压钢板;  动力髋螺钉;  空心螺钉;  移位型股骨颈骨折
Keywords:
Keywords: percutaneous compression plate;  dynamic hip screw;  cannulated screw;  displaced femoral neck fracture
分类号:
R683.42
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:对比分析经皮加压钢板(PCCP)、动力髋螺钉(DHS)、空心螺钉治疗移位型股骨颈骨折的临床疗效。方法:以本院2012年1月至2015年10月收治的120例移位型股骨颈骨折患者为研究对象,根据不同内固定方式将其分为PCCP组、DHS组、空心螺钉组,比较三组围手术期指标及术后并发症。术后随访3～18个月,观察比较三组术后3个月及末次随访髋关节功能恢复情况。结果:PCCP组及空心螺钉组手术时间、术中出血量、术后完全负重时间明显少于DHS组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而PCCP组与空心螺钉组上述指标(完全负重时间除外)比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。空心螺钉组术后并发症发生率明显低于DHS组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而明显高于PCCP组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。PCCP组术后3个月髋关节功能恢复优良率72.50%,显著高于DHS组的20.00%、空心螺钉组的48.89%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。三组末次随访髋关节功能恢复优良率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:三者术后18个月髋关节功能恢复效果类似,但相比DHS及空心螺钉,PCCP治疗移位型股骨颈骨折并发症少,术后完全负重时间早,早期功能恢复更好,而空心螺钉在并发症、术后早期功能恢复上较DHS有优势。
Abstract:
Abstract Objective: To comparatively analyze the clinical effects of percutaneous compression plate(PCCP), dynamic hip screw(DHS)and canulated screw in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures. Methods:120 cases of patients with displaced femoral neck fractures who were admitted in our hospital between January 2013 and October 2014 were selected as the study objects. According to the different internal fixation methods, the patients were divided into PCCP group, DHS group and canulated screw group. The perioperative indexes and postoperative complications were compared among the three groups. Patients were followed up for 3～18 months after operation. The recovery of hip joint function in 3 months after operation and at the last follow-up was observed and compared among the three groups. Results:The operation time, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative full weight-bearing time of PCCP group and canulated screw group was less than that of DHS group(P<0.05)while there were no significant differences between PCCP group and canulated screw group in indexes mentioned above(except for full weight-bearing time)(P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in canulated screw group was significantly lower than that in DHS group(P<0.05), and was significantly higher than that in PCCP group(P<0.05). The excellent rate of recovery of hip joint in PCCP group 3 months after operation(72.50%)was significantly higher than that in DHS group(20.00%)and cannulated screw group(48.89%)(P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the excellent rate of recovery of hip function between the three groups at the last follow-up(P>0.05). Conclusion:The function recovery of hip joint was similar in the three groups18 months after operation. However, compared with DHS group and cannulated screw group, the PCCP group has less complications, early full weight-bearing time and better early functional recovery. Canulated screw has more advantage in complications and postoperative early functional recovery over DHS.

参考文献/References:

[1] 杨火发.不同内固定方法治疗中青年股骨颈骨折疗效及安全性研究[J].实用临床医药杂志,2015,19(21):104-105.
[2] Lee T,Rammohan AV,Chan A,et al.The susceptibility of the femoral neck to fracture:An assessment incorporating the effects of age-remodeling and stress reduction[J].J Biomech,2012,45(6):931-937.
[3] 吕锋.髋关节置换术与骨折内固定术治疗股骨颈骨折的疗效分析[J].局解手术学杂志,2012,21(5):546-547.
[4] Zhang LC,Zhang LH,Xu M,et al.Autologous uncultured bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells and modified cannulated screw in repair of femoral neck fracture[J].J Orthop Res,2013,31(8):1302-1307.
[5] 朱锋,徐耀增,耿德春,等.经皮加压钢板与空心加压螺钉治疗中青年移位型股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2014,16(8):731-733.
[6] Zdero R,Shah S,Mosli M,et al.The effect of the screw pull-out rate on cortical screw purchase in unreamed and reamed synthetic long bones[J].Proc Inst Mech Eng:H,2010,224(3):503-513.
[7] Zeng C,Wang YR,Wei J,et al.Treatment of trochanteric fractures with proximal femoral nail antirotation or dynamic hip screw systems:a meta-analysis[J].Int Med Res,2012,40(3):839-851.
[8] Guo Q,Shen Y,Zong Z,et al.Percutaneous compression plate versus proximal femoral nail anti-rotation in treating elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures:a prospective randomized study[J].J Orthop Sci,2013,18(6):977-986.
[9] Yang E,Qureshi S,Trokhan S,et al.Gotfried percutaneous compression plating compared with sliding hip screw fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures:a prospective randomized study[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2011,93(10):942-947.
[10] Crespo E,Galvez J,Tenias JM,et al.A comparative study between gamma nail and percutaneous compression plating for the treatment of Intertrochanteric hip fractures[J].Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg,2012,38(4):443-449.
[11] Watson A,Zhang Y,Beattie S,et al.Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing dynamic hip screw and screw fixation for undisplaced subcapital hip fractures[J].ANZ J Surg,2013,83(9):679-683.
[12] 邱新建,方宣城,夏西尚,等.动力髋螺钉治疗中青年股骨颈骨折疗效分析[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2015,40(7):930-931.
[13] 马信龙,马剑雄,杨阳,等.不同内固定器固定股骨颈骨折的生物力学比较研究[J].中华创伤杂志,2011,27(11):1003-1007.
[14] 蒋守念,陶海南,方钢,等.空心加压螺钉固定与人工股骨头置换治疗老年股骨颈骨折的疗效对比[J].局解手术学杂志,2013,22(1):80-81.
[15] 曹永志,李惠玲,耿德春,等.经皮加压钢板与空心加压螺钉治疗中青年移位型股骨颈骨折的护理对比分析[J].中国医科大学学报,2014,43(9):857-859.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01